Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

social services


seagull1111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my dad has prostate cancer which has now spread to the bones, he is 86 and been constantly in and out of hospital. when he was in recently the sister said i should start looking for a care home, my dad was ok about this. he has a small property to sell. i asked social services for the 3 month property disregard and to cut a long story short they have said my dad could go home with care ( mmmmm?!) and does not need a care home. i have a letter from his gp and cancer consultant saying he needs care in a nursing home but social services will not budge. i wrote to my m.p. who took the matter up for me but social services remain adamant and the mp has just accepted their decision... i have written to social services asking for their complaint procedure. the nhs assesment my dad had at the same time states he needs nursing in the middle band so how can social services go against this... any help or ideas please... thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Seagull.

 

Sorry to hear about the situation you and your dad find yourselves in.

If you start a new thread in this forum......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nhs/

 

There are a lot of people with knowledge of this sort of thing who will be able to help you out. Just give the same details as you have here and I'm sure you'll get the help you seek.

 

There's a link here that might be of some help......

 

NHS funded Continuing Care and the Coughlan case

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

help anyone???? he has been awarded nhs middle nursing band but social services say he can go home, so how do these 2 things link for goodness sake, i am truly at my wits end.....social services come in and do an assesment that takes about an hour and in that hour the decision is made......i don't understand how the letter from the gp and cancer consultant can be so ignored... i am making a complaint but i fear i know the outcome. i have e mailed my local paper and hope very much they will do an article on it !.. it won't help but it may make me feel better... does this happen all the time does anyone know....?????

any help out there please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this happen all the time does anyone know....?????

 

Not a question you need to ask seagull. You have read and seen on the news the almost weekly errors they make and the tragic consequences of their action.

That's why they are called Social Services and not Social Care Service.

 

They continue even after the "we will learn from this" statements they make after their growing catalogue of errors in which they think they know better than 'professionals'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a look at this group for good information:-

 

NHS funded Continuing Care and the Coughlan case

 

And this forum is also very helpful:-

 

Free nursing care information

 

The Alzheimers Society also has very useful information with respect to issues over care in the home or in nursing homes.

 

Another thing to bear in mind is the Health and Social Care Act 2001. Section 49 states: -

(1) Nothing in the enactments relating to the provision of community care services shall authorize or require a local authority in, or in connection with the provision of any such services, to: -a) Provide for any person, or b) Arrange for any person to be provided with, nursing care by a registered nurse.”

It looks to me that you should be taking this issue up with the NHS and not Social Services, and that your father may well qualify for Continuing NHS Care which should be funded by the NHS in full. He should not have to sell his home to fund his care costs, though Social Services and the NHS may well try and convince you otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend was in the same position with her mother and I advised her to see her local councillor rather than the MP. The councillor was brilliant and got her into a care home quite quickly. If your father is at home in the interim period there are always the MacMillian Nurses, again an organisation that does a brilliant job.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Is your father still in hospital or at home ?

 

Now then you say that the GP said he needs care in a nursing home but the sister says care home. Is this right ? as it will make a huge difference as to which one he needs.

 

Does your dad need care from a trained qualified nurse or could his needs be met by a carer who isn't a qualified nurse. For example does he need help with personal needs, making meals, general eveyday things like that or is his condition as such that he would need nursing intervention ?

 

If your dad has stated he wants to go into a care home ( not nursing ) and he is suitable then social services are not right to say he cant if that is what he wants.

It does get more complicated when it is nursing and not care. Also it depends on what area you are from although its all supposed to be the same different PCTs have different criteria.

 

McMillan nurses although very good at what they do will not do hands on care. They are there to advise you and your father and they are excellent and well up on what services and monies are available.

 

Distict nurses will do the hands on care for your dad at certain stages of his condition if his wish is to stay at home. They will visit regularly for symptom control and support and generally keep an eye out. They can get equipment for your dad such as a hospital bed ( should he need one) and other things too.

 

Also, f your dad wishes to stay at home but needs a little care, then social services should set up a package of care for him. For example a carer to go in 2, 3 or 4 times a day to get him up, washed, dressed and make breakfast and so on !!!

 

Dont let social services make the decisions for your dad.

 

Need to ask anything else just ask xxx

Hope you get it sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

if your dad has been awarded the middle band of nursing care this means the amount of 'health' or 'nursing' element that the NHS will pay to the nursing home. The rest of the fee is made up of 'personal care' costs that are not classed as free nursing care. Off the top of my head i think middle band is approx £80 per week put towards the care home fees which can be anything from £400 upwards per week. That is why Social services will be asking for him to contribute to the cost of the non nursing part. Hope that makes sense.

These days though care homes are not really the done thing as most people prefer to remain in their own homes and there are better quality services to help them do so than care homes. The quality of 'care' in many of these homes is hmmmm - well for example 1 m.o.s. to 12 people on late shift so they start to get put to bed at 6pm and you have bath rotas - once a week is doing really well.

As Dobbydog says he could recieve care at home with input for the 'nursing' tasks from District nurse and Macmillan nurses. Although most areas social servies homecare is subject to a financial assessment - although property is obviously not taken into account.

If he wants to go into a care home maybe he could go for a short stay - respite stay, he would get an idea if he likes it or not.

Regarding the middle band - this will have been agreed by NHS managers following a Nursing Needs assessment done by a district or specialist nurse. - A GP cannot just recommend someone needs a nursing home. There are certain criteria that need to be met to determine the band paid. In cases where there is a very high degree of 'Nursing' needs then they may agree 'Continuing Care' funding which is full NHS funding.

~It might be worth asking to see the nursing needs assessment and remember that if dads condition changes you can request another.

It would definatly be worth contacting your local macmillan nurses too - they may have respite services or other suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As of the 1st October there is only one band for nursing care. But this is a red herring as far as the cost of any care is concerned. The main issue is whether or not your dad has a primary health care need. If he does then the NHS should foot the entire bill, not just the nursing element of it.

 

Social Services will try and convince you otherwise, but they are in the wrong if your dad's needs are health needs. Remember what the Judge in the Coughlan case said:-

 

"Whether it was unlawful depends, generally, on whether the nursing services are merely (i) incidental or ancillary to the provision of the accommodation which a local authority is under a duty to provide and (ii) of a nature which it can be expected that an authority whose primary responsibility is to provide social services can be expected to provide. Miss Coughlan needed services of a wholly different category."

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm interesting Rob - i knew i was a bit rusty on the bands but didnt realise they had been done away with!

So the one band that there is now - is that an NHS contribution towards the cost of care or is it the NHS paying the full cost as in continuing care?

Or is continuing care altogether seperate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new band is a NHS contribution to nursing costs for those who don't qualify for NHS continuing care.

 

NHS continuing care is where the NHS are responsible for the entire costs of keeping someone in a nursing home because their needs are primarily health needs. This is something they will try to avoid at all costs and they and social services will tell people that their issues are social and therefore the NHS are not responsible for the costs.

 

I can still remember the meeting with social workers and hospital staff when my sister and I met them to be told that my father could not return to his very sheltered accomodation and he would have to go into a nursing home. They handed us a list of nursing homes and started on with the usual spiel about the costs having to be met by him if he had assets above a certain level. The look on their faces when I said "So, will you be doing an assessment to see if my father qualifies for continuing NHS care?" was absolutely priceless!!:D :D They had to quickly change tack on that one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

my dad has prostate cancer which has now spread to the bones, he is 86 and been constantly in and out of hospital. when he was in recently the sister said i should start looking for a care home, my dad was ok about this. he has a small property to sell. i asked social services for the 3 month property disregard and to cut a long story short they have said my dad could go home with care ( mmmmm?!) and does not need a care home. i have a letter from his gp and cancer consultant saying he needs care in a nursing home but social services will not budge. i wrote to my m.p. who took the matter up for me but social services remain adamant and the mp has just accepted their decision... i have written to social services asking for their complaint procedure. the nhs assesment my dad had at the same time states he needs nursing in the middle band so how can social services go against this... any help or ideas please... thanks

 

 

to be honest with I think he would get better treated at his own home then a nursing home, nursing home cost alot of money and he will get one on one treatment at home

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...