Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me v booker managent service


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey all I really need some advice.

 

I received a letter from booker Management Services Limited with regards to a CCJ that I received in 2003 from Barclays Bank for £2209.05.

 

They are asking me to discuss payment of the account.

 

Theres also another page saying that the debt was sold to HLCF Limited on the 20th Nov 2006 saying that BMS have been appointed by HLCF to administer the account on there behalf.

 

There is also a letter on Barclays headed paper saying that the debt has been sold to HLCF Limited a d Bookers are a management company dealing with the debt and all correspondence on there behalf.

 

The debt relates to my old student bank account and sadly due to on going depression I got myself into a big mess.

 

I am in the middle of immigrating. I do not own any assests also.

 

Yes the debts mine hands up. Sadly there is alot of unlawful bank charges in there.

 

Can someone please advise me what to do next?

 

Can I still cca this debt?

 

Thanks

 

HM Murdoch

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA and S.A.R them. You will then find out if there is a CCA and how much the bank charges are.

 

U will need the teplates letters for the cca it is letter N

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stupid me i forgot to add the link.

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do believe that there are different rules where a CCJ has already been granted.

 

im afraid i am no expert with CCJ's i think tomterm8 has knowledge in this area it may be worth sending him a pm,

 

i do know that once a CCJ has been obtained the CCA request would not work as the CCJ has been granted and the account/agreement is cancelled, however from my understanding you can apply to have it set aside, but like i said im not an expert in this area

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i got called over here about three minutes before the site was supposed to go down.

 

 

 

i do believe that there are different rules where a CCJ has already been granted.

 

im afraid i am no expert with CCJ's i think tomterm8 has knowledge in this area it may be worth sending him a pm,

 

i do know that once a CCJ has been obtained the CCA request would not work as the CCJ has been granted and the account/agreement is cancelled, however from my understanding you can apply to have it set aside, but like i said im not an expert in this area

 

Regards

paul

 

Life becomes more complicated when a CCJ has been granted. A whole host of questions and legal issues start up. Firstly, the absence of a Credit Agreement can still have some legal force; for example, where interest after judgement, or further enforcement actions not based on the judgement are intended.

 

However, the practical answer is that, very often unless a signed copy of a credit agreement is produced that is provably unenforceable, or some evidence that the credit agreement was unenforceable at the time of judgement, the mere lack of a credit agreement isn't going to get you very far.

 

My own experience is that the cases I've had success in getting a set aside fall briefly into three categories:

 

1. Cases which were filed in default, where the application to set aside is timely.

2. Cases where i can show, at the time the CCJ was issued, that it was issued in error.

3. Cases where there were relevant legal facts that were unknown at the time the CCJ was issued.

 

In particular, some success for some people has occured in getting CCJ's partially set aside on penalty charging arguments, although under the current circumstance it is likely that any application on those grounds would be stayed.

 

However, as a default situation it is often better, if you owe the money, to accept that you have a CCJ and get on with your life. getting a case set aside where you have no defence to a substantial part of the claim can actually hinder you with getting the rest of your life together.

 

For example, CCJ's fall off your credit record after 6 years. You've already had this CCJ for three years; if it was set aside, then a new CCJ awarded, you would start the clock rolling for an entire new 6 year period.

 

EDIT:

 

I notice that you mention "student bank account", and I presume that means overdraft. As you know, overdrafts are excempted from most of the part V requirements in the CCA (e.g. they don't need your signature, and the form of the credit agreement is very much less rigorous).

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for popping in Tom

 

im hopeless with CCJs

 

Regards

paul

 

Hi Paul, CCJ's are difficult, aren't they? By definition, the burden of proof shifts from the claimant to the defendant, and since you've already lost once, it is likely you will lose the second time.

 

It is easier with default judgements, but even then the court will only set aside the CCJ if there is a reasonable case to answer, and the longer you take to apply for the set aside, the harder it is. After three years, it is very, very difficult. Not impossible, however.

 

Personally, I suspect that if the OP has debts less than £5,000 in total, he might be best going for an administration order, with associated composting order.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for you reply Tom

 

Its a tough one to me to work out.

 

I don't own a home or have any assests.

 

I do not work as I am on incapacity benefit due to my last job at the same bank making me so ill.

 

If the debt has been sold does that mean that the owner of the debt can take me to court again and get a new CCJ? Which would last for another 6 years?

 

An adminstration order does seem a possibilty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for you reply Tom

 

Its a tough one to me to work out.

 

I don't own a home or have any assests.

 

I do not work as I am on incapacity benefit due to my last job at the same bank making me so ill.

 

If the debt has been sold does that mean that the owner of the debt can take me to court again and get a new CCJ? Which would last for another 6 years?

 

there would be very little point... if they have a ccj, it is within the 6 years for enforcement action. They might bring another case in a year and a half to keep their rights active.

 

An adminstration order does seem a possibilty.

 

If you have debts less than £5,000 and administration order with subsequent composting order could be the best thing for you.

 

You should be aware that emegrating to another country doesn't generally stop people enforceing a CCJ... because it is possible to enforce a british CCJ in most jurisdictions (especially europe)

 

Of course, if there is an installement order, all you need to do is follow that installemnt order, even if they want to discuss you repaying the debt.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...