Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any chance of some advice with filling in the N164 please?    I've sent an EX107 to the Court to request transcript of the Judgment to use in an appeal but the Courts still haven't actioned this and my 21 days expires on Tuesday
    • The lawsuits allege the companies preyed upon "vulnerable" young men like the 18-year-old Uvalde gunman.View the full article
    • Hi, despite saying you would post it up we have not seen the WS or EVRis WS. Please can you post them up.
    • Hi, Sorry its taken me so long to get round to this, i've been pretty busy today. Anyway, just a couple of things based on your observations.   Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. I'd say theres a 1% chance they read it , but in any case it won't change what they write. They refer to the claim amount that you claimed in your claim form originally, which will likely be in the same as the defence. They use a simple standard copy and paste format for WX and I've never seen it include any amount other than on the claim form but this is immaterial because it makes no difference to whether evri be liable and if so to what value which is the matter in dispute. However, I have a thinking that EVRi staff are under lots of pressure, they seem to be working up to and beyond 7pm even on fridays, and this is quite unusual so they likely save time by just copying and pasting certain lines of their defence to form their WX.   Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. This is just one of their copy paste lines that they always use.   Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. They probably haven't read your WS but did you account for this in your claim form?   Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri.   This is correct but you have gone into this claim as trying to claim as a third party. I would say that you need to pick which fight you wan't to make. Either you pick the fight that you contracted directly with EVRi therefore you can apply the CRA OR you pick the fight that you are claiming as a third party contract to a contract between packlink and EVRi. Personally, I would go with the argument that you contracted directly with evri because the terms and conditions are pretty clear that the contract is formed with EVRi and so if the judge accepts this you are just applying your CR under CRA 2015, of which there has only been 2 judges I have seen who have failed to accept the argument of the CRA.   Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.    This is fine, but again I would say that you should focus on claiming under the contract you have with EVRi as you entered into a direct contract with them according to packlink, as this gives less opportunites for the judge to get things wrong, also I think this is a much better legal position because you can apply your CR to it, if you dealt with a third party claim you would likely need to rely on business contract rights.   As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. I wouldn't focus this as your argument. I did think about this earlier and I think the sole focus of your claim should be that you contracted with evri and any term within their T&Cs that limits their liability is a breach of CRA. If you try to argue that the payment to packlink is the sole reason for the contract coming in between EVRI and packlink then you are essentially going against yourself since on one hand you are (And should be) arguing that you contracted directly with EVRi, but on the other hand by arguing about funding the contract between packlink and evri you are then saying that the contract is between packlink and evri not you and evri.  I think you should focus your argument that the contract is between you and evri as the packlink T&C's say.   Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I doubt they have too, but I think their witness statement more than anything is an attempt to sort of confuse things. They reference various parts of the T&Cs within their WS and I've left some more general points on their WS below although I do think  point 3b as you have mentioned is very important because it says "Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line." which I would argue means that you contract directly with the agency. For points 9 and 10 focus on term 3c of the contract  points 15-18 are the same as points 18-21 of the defence if you look at it (as i said above its just a copy paste exercise) point 21 term 3c again point 23 is interesting - it says they are responsible for organising it but doesnt say anything about a contract  More generally for 24-29 it seems they are essentially saying you agreed to packlinks terms which means you can't have a contract with EVRI. This isnt true, you have simply agreed to the terms that expressly say your contract is formed with the ttransport agency (EVRi). They also reference that packlinks obligations are £25 but again this doesn't limit evris obligations, there is nothing that says that the transport agency isnt liable for more, it just says that packlinks limitation is set. for what its worth point 31 has no applicability because the contract hasn't been produced.   but overall I think its most important to focus on terms 3b and 3c of the contract and apply your rights as a consumer and not as a third party and use the third party as a backup   
    • Ms Vennells gave testimony over three days, watched by those affected by the Post Office scandal.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

URGENT Help Please CCJ Imminent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6059 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

I have read a lot of comments on this excellent forum, but none seem to clarify what I should do next!

 

I received in September a County Court Claim Form from a company requesting payment of an oustanding sum under a Credit Agreement in excess of 10,000 including interest and fees. I am confident I have had no contact with the company in over 6 years. And have checked both my credit files at experian and equifax and note the alleged debt does not appear. Although a search record for the collection company is evident.

 

I returned the form siting I am defending the full amount of the claim.

 

I stated I deny the the full amount of the claim and believe the claimant was statute barred, under the limitations act 1980 section 5, and requested the claimant provide the original signed contract and evidence of the date the last payment was made.

 

Last week I received an Allocation Questionnaire (N150) from the court to be completed and returned by this coming Friday 26th Oct.

 

I think I am ok with filling in most of the form, but am unsure with the section entitled 'Proposed Directions'.

 

I have noticed people mentioning Consumer Credit Agreements (CCA), and am wondering if I should have corresponded with the company before asking them for this as well as informing them they are statute barred unless they can prove otherwise.

 

I would really like to know what directions I should place to the court and in what format. Am I right in thinking I should request the disclosure of the documents CCA and last payment info.

 

Any help or advice you can offer would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

TomTerm is your man for this, he has a defence which requests disclosure under the civil procedure rules and should put them on the spot.

Either wait for him to pop along or send him a PM.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with sequenci. You need to send the disclosure letter to the claimant, but statute barred trumps any other defence.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Tomterm8,

I have been advised by other members of the forum to contact you regarding my issue, so I hope you can help please.

 

The situation is as follows: 7th Sept 07 received a County Court Claim form; the particulars of the claim are;

"The claimant claims outstanding monies due and payable by the defendant under a credit agreement, whereby the the defendant agreed to repay with interest the value of the credit obtained, and the claimant claims

1. the sum of £6983.16

2. Interest Pursuant to S69 of the county Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% from 18/02/2002 to date hereof 2056 days is the sum of 3146.91

3. future interest accruing at the daily rate of 1.53

4. costs"

 

I completed the defense form online denying the full amount of the claim, with the defense that the claimant is 'Statute Barred' as specified under the Limitaions act 1980 s.5.

 

I also requested via the online court reply form that the claimant supply.

1. The original signed contract

2. Evidence of the date the last payment was made.

 

Last week I received a Allocation Questionnaire that needs to be completed and returned to the Court by this Friday 26-10-2007.

 

I think I am able to complete most of the form as required, but am unsure as to what to do about the 'Proposed Directions' section as I think I should propose the court request the documents aforementioned.

 

Can you help please.

Thank you

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Tomterm8,

I have been advised by other members of the forum to contact you regarding my issue, so I hope you can help please.

 

The situation is as follows: 7th Sept 07 received a County Court Claim form; the particulars of the claim are;

"The claimant claims outstanding monies due and payable by the defendant under a credit agreement, whereby the the defendant agreed to repay with interest the value of the credit obtained, and the claimant claims

1. the sum of £6983.16

2. Interest Pursuant to S69 of the county Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% from 18/02/2002 to date hereof 2056 days is the sum of 3146.91

3. future interest accruing at the daily rate of 1.53

4. costs"

 

I completed the defense form online denying the full amount of the claim, with the defense that the claimant is 'Statute Barred' as specified under the Limitaions act 1980 s.5.

 

I also requested via the online court reply form that the claimant supply.

1. The original signed contract

2. Evidence of the date the last payment was made.

 

Last week I received a Allocation Questionnaire that needs to be completed and returned to the Court by this Friday 26-10-2007.

 

I think I am able to complete most of the form as required, but am unsure as to what to do about the 'Proposed Directions' section as I think I should propose the court request the documents aforementioned.

 

Can you help please.

Thank you

S9

 

before answering this question, can i check... is the claimant the original creditor, or is it a debt collection agency?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes I do. It was at the very latest August 2001, however, more than likely May 2001.

 

I have had no written or payment contact with the original creditor HFC or subsequent DCA (currently Robinson Way taking me to court) since then and am really confident the limitations act applies.

 

I not sure though, why on the claim form they request interest from the 18/01/2002. This is puzzling as I was definately not paying them anything well before then.

 

Thanks

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, i would go with:

 

Due to the age of this right of action, I have very few records of the matter raised by the claimant. in order to expidite the case, i therefore request that the court order disclosure of:

 

1. A copy of the original executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records they hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

a. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that the claimant or any former creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that they hold, and proof that these documents were not returned

b. Details of any collection charge added to the account, by the claimant or any earlier creditor

c. Copies of statements for the duration of the account, and a list of payments made to the account, and original proof that these payments were made (specifically, for the LAST payment)

d. True copies of any document of assignment.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes I do. It was at the very latest August 2001, however, more than likely May 2001.

 

I have had no written or payment contact with the original creditor HFC or subsequent DCA (currently Robinson Way taking me to court) since then and am really confident the limitations act applies.

 

I not sure though, why on the claim form they request interest from the 18/01/2002. This is puzzling as I was definately not paying them anything well before then.

 

Thanks

S9

 

18/01/2002 is within the limitation period, August 2001 may not be (assuming they didn't serve the claim form the day before the limitation period ended)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The claim form issue date is 07-09-2007. However I noted that for the purposes of the limitations act the court uses the date that the claimant submitted the calim to them for processing so who knows when that was at present.

Which ever way I look at it, its on the edge of the limitations act timeline. So it will greatly depend on what documents they can produce in court to prove the claim is within the limitations act period.

 

I was wondering though, should I copy to the court via the proposed directions and the disclosure rules my Credit files from Experian and Equifax that do not show any details of the claimant on them? Or just take copies to court on the day if necessary, thing is, will they be admissable if I do not disclose them to the court now??

 

Thank you

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

A document of assignment is a contract that sells the debt from the original creditor to a new DCA.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was wondering though, should I copy to the court via the proposed directions and the disclosure rules my Credit files from Experian and Equifax that do not show any details of the claimant on them?

 

Thank you

S9

 

that's really not relevant, they are not obliged to record data with credit reference agencies.

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tomterm8,

Ok thank you for the advice, cannot thank you enough! not feeling anywhere near as apprehensive as before.

 

I am just so worried about incriminating myself somehow and allowing them to win the case on a technicality that would not have occured had I been able to afford a solicitor.

 

In your experience is there anything else I should lookout for that may trip me up in court?

 

Thanks again

 

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tomterm8,

 

 

In your experience is there anything else I should lookout for that may trip me up in court?

 

S9

 

Basically, the thing that can trip you up in this defence are any of the following

 

1. They served the action before the limitation period is up;

 

2. You admitted the debt in writing (which starts the period again) ;

 

3. You (or in the case of a joint debt, either party) made a payment that restarted the action.

 

4. You intentionally concealed your location.

 

however, with no 4, these days if you either registered on the electoral role or applied for credit, it's pretty much impossible for them to plead, because the period would restart when with reasonable dillegence they could have found you. Which would basically have been immediatly.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I suggest doing a S.A.R. of your old bank account?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tomterm8,

OK! It seems only #1. in your comments may apply as I cannot confirm from my end when exactly the last payment was made to the account.

I do recall in June 2001 contacting the CCCS who advised we arrange to pay our creditors £1.00 goodwill payments, which we started but could not even keep that up! But once again I cannot remember when exactly we stopped the payments. All I am sure of it is was before 2002.

 

I am not sure what a S.A.R. is although I have seen references to it on the forum. I will investigate.

 

However, I think I am running out of time to do anything like that. Not to mention the bank account also defaulted in Aug 2001, another creditor that I have not heard anything from in over 6 years. (Yes, 2001 was a very bad year for our family financially).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Actually, I do not feel so confident right now as I think they may have just sneaked in under the 6 year limitations act limit.

 

I suppose this makes it even more important that I ask them for the correct and proper documents in the 'Proposed Directions' request on the N150 form.

Please wish me luck I think I am going to need it! And thank you all especially Tomterm8 and Sequenci for your helpful advice.

 

Thanks

 

S9

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...