Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • moved to the postal forum 100's of evri court claim threads here to read. dx  
    • if the debt was issued a DN at anytime, then it should not be showing after the DN's 6th b'day, it gets removed from credit files. SAR time? dx    
    • Why would you do a Freedom Of Information Request? Thats for public and government bodies only...    Either way, this is what happens in debt collection. Accounts sold as a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a system that contact people to pay until they give in .  They never send the original agreements with pruchase. And yes, please do name names..
    • I bought a rare collectible item from a friend in USA. I paid him via Paypal and had him send it to my forwarding address in USA. This is a business called Stackry which is essentially storage lockers that consolidate packages for you and you choose how and where to ship them, thus cutting on international shipping costs. I have done this many times before and never had an issue. On this occasion, I chose the option of Global Mail Direct. The package was picked up and handed to DHL e-commerce and I was able to track it all the way to the UK. From then on, it was handed over to Evri and a new tracking number was generated. Long story short, they lost it. The driver marked it "out for delivery" then 2 hours later "returning to sender". I was at home and no attempt for delivery was made. What followed was several weeks of back and forth with Evri through chatbots, emails and phone calls trying to locate the package and have it delivered to me. They said I should contact the sender. I explained that in this scenario I am the sender and the recipient. I did not get anywhere. I emailed the CEO and joined a Facebook group. I kept screenshots of everything. At no point did they make a genuine attempt to intercept the package or locate it or at least assure me that it's on its way back to its origin in the US. For several weeks now, the tracking is simply stuck at "on its way back to sender". They owe me £200 and I intend to get it. I do not care how long it takes or how much it costs me. I am prepared to fight this to the end. I wrote them a letter before action and sent it by tracked post to their HQ giving them 14 days to make things right before I take the matter to court. It has been a week now and I have had no response.  I have no experience with legal matters and I am hoping someone can guide me into what I should do next. Thank you.
    • Thanks Dx, Tbh, I’d forgotten that this account was the subject of a charges claim - nearly 10 years ago now! I don’t know for sure that a default notice was issued by Barclays when the account was in arrears but I would guess there may have been one somewhere in 2010. A suspended repossession order was awarded around May 2010 so I’d assume that a default notice would have been a pre-requisite. Based on the info in the thread those arrears were cleared around 2014-2015 but I don’t have any more info to hand atm since it’s such a long time ago. I believe the files I prepped for court in 2015 have since been shredded. How would the presence or absence of an old default notice help with this current issue? Thanks for the merge/support. J  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefits & Charges


CrystalGecko76
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi...I am on benefits (Incapacity Benefit/Long Term Sick) and NatWest have been taking bank charges off me for times I have gone overdrawn or had a direct debit returned.

 

All this week I have been looking up this subject due to the fact that at the beggining of the week they took £250 in charges from my £398 Incapacity Benefit...leaving me with very little to live on for the rest of the month (I have three weeks to go before my next payment)

 

I contacted Financial Service Ombudsman who will send the bank a letter on my behalf but this will take up to eight weeks and doesn't help me right now!

 

I found the information about the Social Security Administration Act 1992 stating banks cannot take charges from benefits but I need to know if this refers to the whole of the UK or just Scotland, also a direct link to this information (full legal jargon) would be appreciated.

 

Also after speaking to someone at my local CAB they seem to think the banks are in the right to take charges out of benefits as there is no exemption...so I am more confused then ever. I will point out I am in South Wales, UK as sometimes laws are different.

 

I did go into the bank and speak to a representative, the meeting went well. I put my points across stating I was on benefits & in financial hardship and that the taking of charges can induce a knock on effect of which I would never be able to recover...hence putting me into more debt & then the bank would still not get their money, ie if I don't have it they can't have it (in not so many words). My letter is to be passed up to their head offices in Edinbourough and hopefully I should hear back from them in 4-8 weeks time. The person who helped me also said they will look into trying to get one of the charges refunded (I am personally hoping for the £114 one but I bet it will be the £38 they refund instead).

 

So at the moment I am twiddling my thumbs wondering what I should do now...I have borrowed money from a relative, which I will have to pay back but even then I don't know if it is enough and am dreading going into the red again and incurring more charges!

 

Should I get in touch with the DWP and tell them? I don't want to take more money of the state as I feel what I get is enough for someone in my situation (luckily I don't have a massive family to feed, I still have bills/direct debits but I don't smoke, drink or go out so I should be financially secure - it is only when I go overdrawn for a day or so that the trouble starts)

 

Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone else has been in my situation and what they did about it...also was interested if anyone got their money back from NatWest...

 

All the best for now,

Crystal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crystal.

 

Im really sorry to hear about your circumstances.

I have a brother in a similar situation and it breaks my heart that these nobs can ruin so many peoples lives.

 

I wont claim for one second to know what im talking about here, but i have found this and hope it helps.

If not, please try to be patient as im sure somebody much more knowladgeable than me will be along soon, if not i will go banging on a few doors.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/36790-bank-taking-your-benefits.html

 

Please keep us informed as to how things are going.

I will watch with interest.

Good Luck.

Tc.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Social Security Adminstration Act applies also in England and Wales. However, it has no relevance to bank charges. The charges referred to under s.187 relates to a legal charge in the sense of attachment eg in the way how a legal charge is placed on property to secure debts. A bank charge is not a charge in this legal sense. The word charge is simply another name for a fee.

 

 

S.187 has greater relevance in Scotland because creditors can apply for a bank arrestment which places a legal charge on the whole contents of the bank account. Therefore s.187 can be used to prevent the arrestment affecting any money which derives from benefits. Bank arrestments do not exist in England and Wales.

 

You are probably better off going the Ombudsman route rather then through the courts as this will resolve things quicker, although, unfortunately unless your bank is exceptionally sympathetic there is no quick resolution method.

 

Best wishes

 

Zoot :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent an SAR to get details of all charges taken? Then you can begin the process of reclaiming the charges if you haven't already done so. If you've already got a record of the charges then you don't necessarily need to do SAR. In the meantime, would it be possible to open another account, have your benefits paid into there, pay your direct debits etc out of it etc. Yes this might leave a debt with Natwest but you could then negotiate an arrangement to pay so much per month to clear any debt. And possibly ask them for an overdraft facility to cover the charges, then at least you won't get charged £28 a month for going overdrawn on top of everything else. If you do this you would have to be strong and not use the o/d facility for anything else (easier said than done I know). Just my own thoughts, its what I've done in the past and it worked for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...