Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good evening. Hoping to keep this short and concise. Any help really appreciated! Sent originated from council tax in 2019.  I moved address for a new career 240miles away in December 2019 and have lived here ever since.  A distant friend resides at previous address.  A CCJ was filed regarding this debt in January 2020 but no correspondence was received my end or at the old address.  Move forward to this year; early April I learn of a letter received from Bailiff - Notice of Enforcement dated 13/03. Stated I had ten days to settle a payment/payment plan or £75 will be added after ten days from 13/03 and bailiff instructed to visit.  Obviously I was unaware of this letter till well after the time period passed. Attempted to contact Dukes via email but zero response. Asked for breathing space in order to check the original debt with the respective council (I wasn’t awarded a week of Housing despite being on UC for a short period due to a contract date given by the old employer).  29/04 a note was left at the old address stating a bailiff had visited. New balance £310 more than original outstanding.  I’ve since contacted both the council and the bailiff agent to state I’m more than happy to settle the original debt over a payment plan but at this stage they will not remove the fees despite all correspondence not being sent to me and obviously me only seeing them much later than one would have expected.  Tried live chat today with the company and firstly was told the fees will remain because I spoke to the enforcement agent - I have never spoken to him/her.  secondly told the fees would remain because “I tried to use their web chat service to complete an income form” - I have zero recollection of doing this and I also wonder if it’s another tactic? any help on where I stand with the fees added would be incredible. Thank you
    • the evidence you have from Mercedes is perfect. simply write to both the finance company and the dealership that sold you the car, stating under the consumer rights Act 2015 should a fault appear outside of 6mts, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale. Please find enclosed a copy of said report from Mercedes at XXXX stating quite clearly that the windscreen was replaced on Date , some xxx months/years BEFORE my purchase on DATE. there is a bill to pay of XXX to XXX , i expect you to sort this out between yourselves , i am not liable for this. something upon those lines anyway.  
    • Not really. I just wrote it based upon my credit file data with screenshots and stuff.  Also referring to multiple data points. You need to read before sending or writing it.    I have plenty of experience in this stuff so takes me half hour to write something like this. For you itll take an afternoon probably. An additional day with it on your CRA wont cause a problem.     Reference Material; ICO Credit File Guide - https://ico.org.uk/media/your-data-matters/documents/1282/credit-explained-dp- guidance.pdf ICO Main Page For Credit - https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/credit/ CMF Limitation Act 1980 - https://www.checkmyfile.com/articles/the-limitation-act-1980-and-debt-time-limits.htm Gov Limitations Act 1980 - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/2023-11-18 (Latest Version) Transunion 6 Years - https://www.transunion.co.uk/consumer/credit-report-help/how-long-does-information-stay-on-my-credit-report-for Equifax 6 Years - https://help.equifax.co.uk/EquifaxOnlineHelp/s/article/Howlongdoesadefaultedorsettledaccountstayinmyreport Experian 6 Years - https://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/guides/defaults.html#:~:text=A default will stay on,you still%20owe%20them%20money
    • Thanks fkofilee , by any chance is there a templete for guidance that i could use to help me write the complaint?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Doorstepped by "Barclaycard"


posieflump
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6069 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First of all, a quick and belated "hello" to everybody. Although this is my first post, I've been a regular visitor to these forums for several months now and have found plenty of very helpful information within.

 

Now down to business. The buzzer to my flat went this lunchtime. I answered it through the intercom, and a man asked to speak to me by name. I asked who it was, and he was initially reticent to answer. I told him he wouldn't get in unless he told me in what regard he was calling. He said he was from Barclaycard.

 

I didn't let him in, and told him quite clearly I wouldn't do so, but we had a short chat over the intercom before he left.

 

 

I lost my job a while back and, hoping to slam the brakes on before the train derailed, wrote to all of my creditors in March - more than a couple of months before any one of them went into arrears - to explain the situation. Surprisingly, my MBNA Abbey credit card were the most helpful, not only telling me their requirements, but also suggesting I contact the Consumer Credit Counselling Service (which I already had). Never had any trouble with MBNA.

 

Egg were stroppy, and it took some considerable time to get them to agree to the terms of my Debt Management Plan.

 

Most stubborn of all, however, have been Barclaycard / Mercers. They call me three times a day, every day, despite my requesting all contact in writing. I simply let the answerphone pick their calls up. However, I didn't actually expect somebody to call at my door, despite it having been threatened in the past.

 

So, as part of this lengthy introductory message, I'd like to say "thanks" to you in this forum. The visit shook me up a bit, even though I stood my ground and he left in peace. It was then that I decided to actually join the forum, as it was my first port of call after the visit. It was very reassuring re-reading information which I admittedly knew (such as that they have no right of access), but nevertheless I paranoidly worried about.

 

I've decided to write to Mercer's. Here is my letter, which will no doubt be ignored. You may recognise some of it - bits were shamelessly lifted from here. Again, a big thanks. This site is a great resource.

 

 

Dear Mercers,

 

I write to you following a visit from one of your operatives this lunchtime, to whom I refused access. Please be advised that I am onlyprepared to communicate with you in writing. OFT rules and regulations clearly state that you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you. There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission: the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

 

Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives, to visit me at my property and if you persist in sending doorstep callers to my home, you will be reported for harassment and be liable for damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be liable for conspiring in a tort of trespass by acting in defiance of my instructions and sending someone to visit me nevertheless.

 

 

Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction.

 

Furthermore, I am taking steps to have incoming calls barred from your number, as well as those from withheld numbers.

 

As I have explained numerous times, I am currently unemployed and searching for work. I am therefore unable to meet the payments on my Barclaycard account, an account which I have otherwise kept in good order for many years. I wrote to Barclaycard with regard to this matter on 9 March, 14 April, and 23 May, the first two occasions being before the account went into arrears. Each of these letters was summarily ignored by Barclaycard.

 

I am currently on a Debt Management Plan with the Consumer Credit Counselling Service. The majority of my creditors have accepted the offers made under the terms of the plan; Barclaycard have not.

 

However, under the Plan, I pay Barclaycard £10.14 a month, a sum which they have received since the Plan started in July. I can not afford to pay more at this present time.

 

You are welcome to contact CCCS with regard to this debt. My client number is *******. Their contact details are as follows:

 

Consumer Credit Counselling Service,

Wade House,

Merrion Centre,

Leeds LS2 8NG

 

Telephone 0845 272 5400

 

I enclose a copy of my personal budget sheet, as drawn up with CCCS, for your files.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

..............

 

EDIT: P.S. My apologies - I appear to have posted this in the wrong section. If a moderator could move it to the Debt section, I'd be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know Mercers are Barclaycard but you should also write to B'card and remind them that they are responsible for the actions of their debt collectors (as agents) and any complaint about their behaviour to the statutory authorities will include them as well.

 

Tell Mercers, unless you've already sent the letter, that any further calls will result in you telling the caller to go away and if he refuses the police will be called. Trespass is not a criminal offence but harrassment is. Have the police station number close to hand - its not 999, more likely to be an 0845 number as it is not an emergency

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments, ODC and NailPost. I've already posted the letter, but I'll bear the extra comments in mind the next time I('m bound to have to) write to them.

 

Strangely, I received a letter from ScotCall last week, memorably described on here by somebody as "the paramilitary wing of Barclaycard", threatening a visit. I say strangely because the man firstly identified himself as being from Barclaycard, then Mercers. My suspicions at the ScotCall letter were first aroused as the second paragraph, telling me to contact Mercers immediately, directly contradicted the first, in which ScotCall claimed to have taken over management of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, under the Plan, I pay Barclaycard £10.14 a month, a sum which they have received since the Plan started in July. I can not afford to pay more at this present time.

 

Who came up with this figure? If you are unemployed this is too high. £1 a month is more realistic.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Posie, you must be one of very few people here that has actually been doorstepped by a DCA. Given that you have done all the right things by arranging a DMP I can't understand why they've singled you out for a visit. It certainly takes harassment to a new level. Well done for not letting them in and sending the letter. We are all behind you all the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the further replies. Rory - I pay £10.14 a month through my Debt Management Plan as agreed with CCCS. I'm happy to do this and entered into the agreement willingly. And the majority of my creditors are happy with the terms of the Plan, with one exception...

 

ODC and Dakota - The bloke who called mentioned something about Mercers having trouble getting in touch with me. I told him I'd told THEM I wouldn't talk on the phone, but I had written several times, and he said, "that must be it." I made a regretfully barbed comment about Liverpudlians being unable to read and write before he left.

 

Again, if it hadn't been for what I'd read previously on this site, I'd have probably let him in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also write to Barclaycard, Mercers and Scotcall, asking each of them for a copy of their complaints procedure. xx

Reminding them that as original creditor they are liable for the actions of people collecting on their behalf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are happy for the answerphone to take the calls and you've written to them that's fine. If you think you might want to make an official complaint about harassment it's a good idea to keep a record of all phone calls and personal visits. My view is that for somebody who has a DMP this behaviour is totally unacceptable. You may want to make a complaint via your local trading standards and also the OFT. You could also involve the FOS after you have followed the complaints procedure of the companies concerned. An FOS complaint costs the companies £400 in fees,he he.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also write to any of these people and insist that you have any communication in writing.

 

You can write stating that under the Communications Act 2003 you are entitled not to be harassed on the telephone and that all further communications be in writing. So, from now on you will report them to the police if you receive any further calls. There is a letter in the Templates Library which covers this, but what I have said above will suffice.

 

You have a right to privacy and the law is firmly on your side. It will stop the incessant phone calls dead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should but most of the companies mentioned will ignore your requests esp Mercers. Delfi has a huge thread on their constant phone calls. Its getting someone to actuall take legal action on the harrassment that is the problem. Apparently it has to be an official body and most seem reluctant

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might help re. complaints. It's the quick guide by the Financial Ombudsman for businesses, but it's very relevant for all of us. This guide must be followed by businesses - state your intention to complain, request their complaints procedure, and they have to pay serious attention. As Dakota says, this is the Financial Ombudsman Service we're talking about. Let them all know just how unacceptable this behaviour is - and as ODC also says, the original creditor is ultimately responsible for the actions of these gooks!

Helping you resolve complaints (PDF)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also write to Barclaycard, Mercers and Scotcall, asking each of them for a copy of their complaints procedure. xx

Reminding them that as original creditor they are liable for the actions of people collecting on their behalf

 

That's certainly something to bear in mind. Thanks for the tips.

 

 

If you are happy for the answerphone to take the calls and you've written to them that's fine.

 

The only annoying thing about it is that they don't leave a message about 95% of the time. Then again, it's probably an automated dialler.

 

 

My view is that for somebody who has a DMP this behaviour is totally unacceptable.

 

My view is that for somebody who wrote to them AND called them, following their own suggested procedures, requesting help several weeks before the account went into arrears, and THEN felt obliged to take out a DMP as the only option BECAUSE he couldn't get them to listen, they deserve a good slapping!

 

 

An FOS complaint costs the companies £400 in fees,he he.

 

Is that regardless of outcome, or only if the company is found guilty? If the former, bring it on!

 

 

You can also write to any of these people and insist that you have any communication in writing.

 

Yep - I have a folder full of such letters. No effect.

 

 

You can write stating that under the Communications Act 2003 you are entitled not to be harassed on the telephone and that all further communications be in writing. So, from now on you will report them to the police if you receive any further calls. There is a letter in the Templates Library which covers this, but what I have said above will suffice.

 

You have a right to privacy and the law is firmly on your side. It will stop the incessant phone calls dead.

 

I went over the above verbally with the bloke who called yesterday. It may be a coincidence, or a computer error, but I haven't had their (annoyingly regular) mid-afternoon, 6.30pm or 8.30am calls since. Funny, that. Perhaps he actually listened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow-up: I received a letter from Mercers in today's post. The standard "you have 7 days to pay in full or else" letter. It's the sixth identical letter they've sent me in three months, as well as two telling me they were passing the debt on to another firm (which also turned out to be Barclaycard pretending to be somebody else).

 

There should be an adjective here, but I don't want to be banned after only 8 posts for using bad language!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm late to this thread but as others have said you're doing exactly the right thing. Keep your cool, keep everything in writing, and keep detailed logs of all their calls whether attempted or successful.

 

You can beat the bullies :D

  • Haha 1

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...