Desperate Daniella
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
6,086 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Desperate Daniella
-
Hi The Mould, I know Wendy is not around for a while this afternoon but I know she will be so delighted to know that you are still here for her. Unless I am muddled, there wasn't a CCJ before the Statutory Demand; they just went for the Statutory Demand and as Wendy didn't defend, because she didn't know about it, they got the judgment. Hope you are having a better day today. DDxx
-
'Legal High' Shops.....
Desperate Daniella replied to fran1phil's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
I have not seen these shops. I am horrified. Are they actually called "Legal High" shops? -
BB has told you exactly the right thing to do. They had no right whatsoever to speak to your employer about your personal "alleged" debts, and they know that very well. Please do put in all the complaints. DD
-
Hi Hermanus, Sorry, I have not been on the forum for a few days. Apart from putting them on the spot by using CPUTR, I would also say: The Waksman Judgment in Carey v HSBC, paragraph 234 (4) clearly states that where an agreement has been varied by the creditor under a unilateral power of variation a copy of the original agreement must be supplied, and it is this that you require them to send you. DD
- 64 replies
-
- barclaycard
- offer
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Full and Final settlement with Cap1
Desperate Daniella replied to Doingmybest's topic in Capital One
Hi, I don't think they will give you all the charges back and then write the balance off at the same time. I think you should start by reclaiming the PPI and charges, and when you have done that you can start challenging the agreement. In over five years here I have never seen a genuine Capital One agreement/application and that's because Capital One know that their so-called agreement did not comply with the Regs of the CCA 1974 so they are never going to let anyone see them. DD -
I didn't mean not to claim it at all, I just meant it wasn't the top priority at the moment and if it had been knocked off the balance at the right time then the bankruptcy threshold wouldn't have been reached and none of this could have happened! I think it will have to be an oral hearing too. The question is whether or not Wendy does this herself. I personally think if she can afford it she should be represented. I think a good barrister could win this for her. It's very easy to get flustered, especially if you get an unsympathetic judge, and where Wendy is on dodgy ground here is the length of time before the appeal.
-
Mike, I agree with you. Wendy needs specialist advice and to be represented by a barrister who knows what they are doing. I do agree with the advice you are giving: Wendy wasn't insolvent so it should never have been bankruptcy. But also there were unfair charges on the account and had these been removed the claim would not have reached the bankruptcy threshold, also bearing in mind that she would have also have argued that the mobile phone accounts weren't owed either.
-
Hi Hermanus and Slick, I've actually used the CPUTR argument successfully to get Lowell and Cabot to admit they don't have a copy of the agreement, so can't enforce. Lowell made "a commercial decision" to write the balance off. However, I don't quote sections I simply tell them they are "obliged under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR 2008) to let me know if they hold, or have ever held, a properly regulated consumer credit agreement relating to the account, and they are equally obliged to advise me if they hold no such agreement." If they don't answer the question I write again and say something like, "This is a simple question. Do you hold...... etc.) I know it won't work for everyone, but it worked for me. DD
- 64 replies
-
- barclaycard
- offer
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Arrows claimform for +_10yrs old cap1 card 'debt'
Desperate Daniella replied to chold4's topic in Financial Legal Issues
There has been a very long debate on here about when the six years starts. Apparently the date starts at the time the creditor is able to take action against you - after one missed payment, or a certain number of days, etc. There should be something in the term and conditions but often there isn't. I have never been able to find a definitive answer about what happens if they default many months after the last payment. Do you know the exact date the last payment was made? DD -
The last post Wins.
Desperate Daniella replied to Conniff's topic in The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
That depends on whether or not we agree with Horsen's interpretation of the rules. -
Arrows claimform for +_10yrs old cap1 card 'debt'
Desperate Daniella replied to chold4's topic in Financial Legal Issues
Hi chold4, Just a quick question: When did your ex make the last payment on the account? If they put a default on his credit file and this has now fallen off it probably means the debt is over six years old and statute barred which is a complete defence in itself. DD -
Hello, t_harv,and welcome to CAG! You'll need to start your own thread giving specific details of your debt, the date the account was opened, last payment you made, etc. I think you should call it Claim from Northampton CC - Old Lloyds Debt - 1st Credit. When did you receive the claim form? If you post a link here we'll come to your thread to help you. DD
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.