Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ParcelBroker DHL lost parcel


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I despatched a parcel to Germany via DHL through Parcelbroker. The customer contacted me roughly 3 weeks after despatch to say the parcel had not turned up. I contacted DHL who took about another 10 days to try to trace the parcel and confirmed it was missing. I then put in a claim to Parcelbroker who have rejected the claim because it was after 12 days from collection. I insured the parcel for sale price.

 

This seems quite unfair that they can do this as it takes time to deliver abroad and even longer to try and trace it. Is there anything I can do about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very straightforward. They are completely in the wrong and in fact they are acting unfairly by trying to impose an unfair and unenforceable term on their customers.

 

Any delay in informing them of the problem has had no bearing on the fact that they've lost it and that they have breached their contract.

 

I wouldn't waste any time. I would send them a 14 day letter of claim and then issue the court proceedings for the full amount, plus the delivery cost plus interest. The chances of you winning are better than 95%. The chances that they will stop being stupid and put their hands up to avoid any further costs are better than 85%. However, if they decide to call your bluff then you would have to pay a hearing fee to go into court – but you would get a judgement in your favour that we would be happy to put up here and you could publish elsewhere on the Internet so that people can see what a cheapskate little company this really is.

 

Bring a small claim in the County Court is extremely easy and we will be pleased to help you.

 

By the way, what is the value of the parcel and how much did you pay for the delivery?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just checked, and they say that they are a delivery comparison site. Did you pay them the money? Or did you paid directly to DHL? Conceivably they might try to say that it's nothing to do with them because she did not make a contract with them. Please let us know what the arrangements are.

 

 

1 June 2018

 

I've had a further look at their terms and conditions and in fact I see that they aren't really a comparison site. They say that they choose the cheapest courier service that they then commissioned the delivery using their own account.

 

They are clearly acting as a middleman and they are buying the service and then selling it on to customers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your quick response, I will send them a letter of claim tomorrow.

 

To confirm, I paid Parcelbroker the money - they are the same service as parcel2go etc.

 

The parcel sold for £185 which is what I insured it for. Delivery cost to Germany was £22.14

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine. Before you send the letter, make sure that you are intent on following through with your threat. There is no point in sending the letter if you don't want to follow through. They will call your bluff until they receive the court papers. They may even try to call your bluff until they know that you have paid the claim fee. Once that happens, it is most unlikely that they will take you into court.

 

Are you a business or are you a private consumer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sole trader.

 

I have tried to contact them again before writing an LBA but they have not bothered to respond so writing an LBA now.

 

Is this acceptable for an LBA? (I have removed personal details)

 

"I have not received a response to my email sent on the 6th of April 2018 requesting payment for the parcel lost in post.

 

 

I am writing to you again to request a refund of £109.20 for the Racal 1998 plus £20 for PAT test, clean and repair as well as refund for delivery cost to Germany of £22.14 (including insurance coverage). I believe I am due this money because you breached the contract through loss of the parcel.

 

 

 

I would like a reply as soon as possible so that I know you have received this letter. If you don't agree to the refund, could you please then send me a detailed response saying why you don't agree."

 

 

Should I mention how the 12 day policy is unfair?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a letter of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Edit: I mean consequential loss not consequential cost

Sorry for weird posting, tried to edit but thought it would add to end of message and can't now edit as past 10 minute rule. So lets try again.

After sending an LBA, Parcelbroker got back to me and have accused me of breaching the contract by directly contacting DHL customer services instead of going through PB.

They have also offered a 'gesture of good will' payment of £102 which is the cost of the item but does not include lot surcharge, PAT test, calibration etc because they consider that a 'consequential loss'

There has also been no offer of paying back delivery cost but they have said

"Please note that shipping charges will be processed on a separate transaction upon acceptance of this return claim statement."

Where do I stand with this?

Should I just accept the offer or can I try to get back the 'consequential losses' and delivery cost?

Edited by Courierinsure
Mistake on wording
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you post up your letter of claim in PDF format. Please also will you post up the messages they have sent you in which they deny will dispute liability.

 

Can you tell us more about the items which you sent. Why does it need all these PAT-tests and calibration et cetera? Did you declare the nature of the item when you are sending it?

 

When did you incur these tests and calibration et cetera costs.

 

Here are Parcel Brokers terms and conditions https://parcelbroker.co.uk/terms/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...