Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BMW Finance/Lester Aldridge Solicitors-Two cars, excess mileage/car repo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

it probably is as complex as it sounds, but any help would be greatly appreciated:

 

A couple of years ago, I suffered a catastrophic loss of income due to a provider with whom I had been working with for some time, went under.

The details of this are irrelevant to the questions I have for this forum I guess, but I hope it adds context to the following:

 

When I lost my income for that time, I had a number of essential commitments that my ignorance of alternatives, led to me getting into significant debt.

In spite of this, there were brief moments of clarity that allowed me to make some more sensible financial decisions,

one of which was getting rid of my petrol guzzling car that I loved almost more than life itself (ok, a bit excessive maybe).

 

The car concerned was bought from BMW on a PCP over 4 years, and this being my third from the same dealer and same salesman, I was more than happy to deal with him again.

 

As with most PCP deals, payments varied depending on the estimated mileage over term of the agreement.

the deal that attracted me was based on 8000 miles per year,

which I immediately knew might not be enough,

 

 

I asked the salesman what he would recommend;

increasing the mileage (which I wanted to do),

or increasing the payments to accommodate the extra mileage on the contract.

 

 

I told the salesman that there was a possibility that I could go considerably over the 8000 miles,

the salesman replied: "you should be fine-I'd leave it as it is, and the GFV will swallow everything up".

 

I took his advice and went ahead with my dream car, and loved every minute of owning it,

until I found myself being unable to justify keeping the car,

in spite of it being 4 months before the end of the 4 year agreement.

 

I decided to downsize and went back to BMW again and found a car that was less in monthly outgoings,

and more economical to run,

and it seemed like a great idea at the time.

 

 

I said I'd take the car, paid £1000 deposit, and that was that.

It's worth noting that I didn't sign any paperwork,

just verbally agreed that I'd take the car (although I accept that could constitute a verbal contract).

 

However, a week later, it seemed like a really bad idea,

I contacted the Dealership to say that I couldn't justify the cost,

stated that I would like to cancel the order,

as I believed I had the right to do,

with consumers as I thought,

being allowed a cooling off period.

 

Needless to say, the salesman was none too pleased,

tried to persuade me to change my mind, eventually accepted my decision.

 

 

I asked about the £1000 deposit, and he said "he'd see what he could do, but the sales manager was "too angry to ask" at that point.

 

I never got the £1000 back (though admittedly, I'm not even sure I'm entitled to it).

 

Still with my car, I decided (after some probably ill informed research), to VT the car.

It was 4 months from the end of the contract,

I had been told that VT'ing prevents the consumer from being liable for excess mileage charges (which were apparently £8000 in total).

 

I went through the process, and the car was inspected thoroughly, with a £250 bill at the end of it.

I thought that was absolutely fine, and thought that was it, until I got a letter from BMW asking for the excess mileage charge.

 

I disputed it (informally), but they were adamant,

this is where I'd become a bit overwhelmed by the impact of the loss of income,

went into ostrich mode for a short time,

the consequence of which was Lester Aldridge Solicitors becoming involved.

 

To cut a very long story long, they wouldn't budge on this, and an interim charging order was placed on the family home.

 

I needed another car,

was back working,

managed to get one.

 

 

I was really happy with it,

set up the Direct Debit,

signed the forms,

drove the car home.

 

Despite my happiness,

I was probably using that to deflect from the suffocating effects of trying to sort out my debt,

and again, I must admit that my connection with "real life" was suffering somewhat at that time.

 

It transpired that my DD for what I can see as no reason whatsoever, wasn't honoured by my bank, I didn't realise, resulting in 3 missed payments.

Again, I m not trying to absolve myself of blame,

however I hadn't remembered receiving any letters about this.

 

I eventually did phone the finance company

(which turned out to be that same finance company that oversaw my previously,

i.e. the same finance company who were pursuing me for excess mileage charges),

 

 

I spoke to an incredibly condescending chap called "Andy".

I explained to Andy thread through needle my financial issues at that time,

also spoke about the distress it had and was causing me (which was really bloody hard to do).

 

 

I did have a little bit of money available, and made the offer of paying two of the three payments outstanding, and to pay the third outstanding payment within the following month (as in the following 4 weeks).

His reply was "nope, you've got to pay everything outstanding".

 

 

I persisted and again put forward my offer, and again recounted the previous 12 months and the difficulties I'd faced during that time,

again said "nope, you've got to pay the full amount outstanding by the end of the month (which was two weeks from the date of the phone call).

 

 

As I felt I wasn't going anywhere with this call, and as I was unaware of anything else I could do about this,

I said "I guess I'm going to see what I can do",

to which I received the response

"Ok, you've been talking to Andy, you have a nice day now, yeah".

My back was well and truly up.

 

Needless to say, at that time, I wasn't able to find that third payment,

two weeks after the "deadline" passed, my wife woke me up and said "someone's here to take the car-you better get up" (it was approximately 7am).

 

 

Completely bleary eyed and in my dressing gown,

a man was there with a recovery vehicle,

holding a sheet of paper, saying "I'm here to take your car".

 

 

I was floored yet again, and it took a moment for me to utter anything remotely coherent in the direction of this guy.

 

I said to him "is there any way I can avoid this? I need my car for work and I've already tried to negotiate a repayment of the outstanding payments".

He said "that's not up to me-you'd have to contact the finance company itself" (which I guess is fair enough".

Completely unaware of any rights I may/may not have,

 

 

I asked the recovery guy "do I have any choice in this?",

to which he replied "No",

"I said what do I have to do?"

and he said "you could give me the keys to the car".

I handed the car keys over and he pulled the car off my drive.

 

 

Humiliated doesn't even begin to cover it, nor devastated.

I had a 40 mile trip to work and a morning school run to try and factor in with no car.

We managed to work something out, which was at great financial expense (trains, taxi's etc..),

but eventually we managed to get a car

(in my wife's name, and bless her, I was probably as devastated at bringing this to her door, as anything else).

 

I immediately phoned the finance company,

explained what had happened,

I was met with a girl/lady who I think was called "Davina".

 

 

Now this person wasn't condescending,

she was rude,

in fact aggressive at points during the conversation,

 

 

at one point, although paraphrasing, essentially called me a liar when speaking about the circumstances leading up to the repossession.

 

 

I questioned the legality of the repossession man taking the car off my drive,

she said aggressively "YOU HANDED YOUR KEYS OVER-HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS".

 

 

I explained my financial circumstances and said I hadn't recalled any letters being received about missed payments,

she said "WE DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU'VE RECEIVED IT-WE JUST HAVE TO PROVE THAT WE'VE SENT IT".

 

 

Now whether she's right or wrong about any of this,

her manner was absolutely disgraceful,

and this being at a time when I was in a very dark place

(which again, is very very hard for me to say).

 

The sum total of all of this, and again, so as not to be firing the burden of responsibility completely at the door of others,

I became the archetypal ostrich, and found it really hard to respond to anything,

 

 

several months later, I received a demand for £11k from Lester Aldridge Solicitors acting on behalf of the finance company.

This has resulted in a further Interim Charging Order on the house,

I do take responsibility for this,

due to me feeling completely frozen and overwhelmed by the whole situation,

and not really knowing where to turn.

 

I have a relatively good income again now,

I've managed to pull myself out of this hole (I've no idea how),

have gone through Stepchange and they have been really helpful,

with some structure and order to my debts,

along with no longer dreading the postman proving to be a huge stress reducer,.

 

 

The whole business with the car finance company however leaves me with some concerns, also a huge sense of injustice.

 

 

I VT'd my car because I genuinely couldn't continue to run it,

when I realised I was behind on my payments with the following car,

made what I thought was a reasonable offer of repayment

(I thought the finance company are obliged to listen to and consider the offer, along with negotiating repayment if they weren't happy with the offer?).

 

I'm sorry it's a long read

I hope people will be able to offer me some advice on this,

if there are any other questions raised,

I'd be happy to answer them.

 

Cheers.

Edited by Sunraged
Link to post
Share on other sites

that's BMW finance for you

never been any different.

 

 

you stupidly handed the keys over

when you had no need too

 

 

cant see there's anything you can do

bar look at reclaiming any stupid insurances PPI and FEES

 

 

get an sar off get all the paperwork on all agreements.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...