Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

reclaiming PPI GE Money/Loans.co.uk


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Tomorrow marks the 1 month mark for me SARing GE Money and Loans.co.uk.

 

I wanted to wait a while to see I could get an original council tax letter to send

I could not get one

the previous one I used this year was not returned

I had to work with a photocopy of a photocopy.

After a short while that is what I used.

 

I'm doing this on behalf of my Dad.

We got one letter back from the address I had for Loans.co.uk and they wanted verification on who my Dad is.

I'm not sure what to do there or what to even send to do that.

They also sent back the £10 postal order.

 

With GE Money there has been nothing.

The date the letters and postal order was sent was the 18th October.

Tomorrow is the 18th November.

I did notice that GE Money have a PPI section on their website where you can give them details and they look into it for you,

I figured the SAR would reveal everything.

 

Obviously they could come tomorrow but if they don't what are my options?

Do I contact them by letter?

Do I contact them by phone?

Do I use the PPI section of their website?

They were both sent recorded so I know they did receive them.

What do you do when they don't send the paperwork?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar is 40 days.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as for loans.co.uk

send them what they want.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

passport would do

he don't drive now I bet?

gas/electric billS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there, there's not much to report.

 

My Dad didn't want to send his passport or driving licence because he wasn't sure if they would ever be sent back.

Also we don't have any recent electric/gas bills or council tax letters.

 

I had sent a photocopy of a photocopy of the last council tax letter which was way back at the start of last year

so I don't know if that caused any problems with Loans.co.uk and the fact that I had sent photocopies rather than an original copy.

 

With GE Money we decided to leave it a while longer just in case there was issues with the post

in December left it longer just in case maybe the Christmas post affected anything but still nothing has come.

 

We have had nothing back from them so at least they didn't return anything.

They aren't open today but hopefully they are tomorrow and I can call them.

 

I also have the receipts from the post office which not only have the number for sending recorded delivery

(I will have to double check it was received and signed for)

but also the £10 postal order with their name and postcode on it.

 

When this happens and you SAR a company and they don't give you the documentation and don't give you any reason why they are not giving you it what is the best thing to do and to say to them?

 

I know GE Money have a part of their website dedicated to PPI and you can make a claim online so obviously they must have staff there doing that work but with me already sending the postal order and making the SAR request what is the best way to go forward with them?

Is it on the phone?

Is it in writing?

 

If it comes down to documentation obviously

I'll have to have another thorough look to see if there are any original documents,

I think there are some gas and electric bills but they are from an old company,

but they do have my Dad's name and address on it.

 

I can't even be sure if they are there since they would be well over a year old and there's a good chance they were thrown out.

I don't know if we will receive any new bills or council tax letters, if we do then I think we will give Loans.co.uk another try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you never ever send originals!!

 

give em a ring

ask where it is

an sar is a legal document

failure to comply can lead them to be taken to court.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not long off the phone.

 

The SAR team finished early today but the person on the phone told me what happened.

They did send a letter out but it was to the previous address and it was the previous address that was on their system.

They said that was on the 20th November.

 

They apologized for that and said the reason for the letter is they failed to do a signature check

which means they don't have any signatures on file

so they couldn't check the signature on the letter against anything

 

I can either send in my Dad's passport or driving licence as those will have signatures and also a recent letter with the current address on it.

 

They asked if we had anything within the last 3 months which we don't

the easiest way to do it was to phone the bank and ask them to send a statement out.

 

She said he could black out the statement part if he wanted

but I'm not sure how you would do that

but that leads me to the next part.

 

She said with the signature,

I could scan it and email it rather than post it.

I don't know if the letter could be the same way and black the statement out that way.

 

They asked to confirm if anyone else was on the account

I said my Mum is but she passed away

they said to send in the Death Certificate by post.

Once the signature is received and the Death Certificate is received

they have 40 days to send out the paperwork.

 

We're going to see if there's any letters from the bank dated within the last 3 months

if so that would save me phoning and waiting longer for the statement to arrive and obviously post the Death Certificate and send it recorded.

 

I don't know if the best way to do it is half and half,

half scanned in and emailed

and the Death Certificate has to be sent in physically

or send it all in the mail.

 

I'm sure it will be fine but obviously there's some paranoia that they wont send them back

but she said everything is updated on the system to say what the current address is.

 

The accounts were on their system,

they asked for the account number

but we didn't know it

 

they said that is fine and did other security checks

so hopefully if this can all be done tomorrow they wont be long in sending everything out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do it ALL by scans attached to an email.

use PDF as that will be zoomable

 

that way you can blank out what you need too.

 

VERY important on the bank statement!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just rsvp on the email

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We got a certified bank statement today and I've blanked out the statement part and the account details and balances.

 

I got scans of the Death Certificate and Driver's Licence and created a PDF

 

emailed it to them

asked them to respond

confirm they have received it

will continue with the SAR

send the information out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

All of the paperwork arrived today and there is quite a lot of it. I haven't seen anything about PPI yet but will have a closer look. Having looked at the statements it seems to be -

 

Direct Debit

Interest

Direct debit recall charge

Additional Interest

Direct debit recall

Direct debit receipt

Administration fee

Debt Counselling

Field Agent Inv:

Solicitor Interim Legal Fees

Redemption Cheque Blemain Finance

Income on early settlement

Solicitor Discharge Fee

Administration Discharge Fee

Repayment of administration charges

Repayment of fees and additional interest

Repayment of capital

Balance transfer on settlement.

 

Is there anything there that I should be taking note of?

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm lots of penalty charges there by the looks of it!!

and they took you to court at sometime too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot haha.

 

I have no idea about going to court.

I will need to ask my Dad about it all.

 

On the actual individual statements there is a thing called Debt Counselling which is £47 for several months and I found another document saying they recommended the Debt Counselling.

 

It does say the total loan amount and what goes where.

Halifax, 2 payments to Igroup Financial Services, Champion Finance, a portion to my parents and the bulk of it all to Blemain Finance.

 

The company Igroup Finance pops up everywhere,

the initial loan seems to be with them or at least it's their name on the application form.

 

The 'Introducer' is listed as Champion Finance.

There is a letter from Blemain also addressed to GE Money saying there is a cheque enclosed for the full amount of what was required. I'm trying to figure out how GE Money figure into all this.

 

The very front page of the SAR says -

Loan Owner - GE Money Secured Loans Ltd

 

Also looking through the individual statements,

for around the first half of them at the top left hand corner it says Originator: Igroup Loans Limited

below it gives a phone number if you need to contact them.

 

From then on it no longer says that but it does say GE Money at the bottom with their logo and the phone number listed is the same phone number.

 

Does that mean they are under the same umbrella?

Same company?

Loan Originator - GE Money Secured Loans Limited

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are all part of the GE group

 

those fees can all be reclaimed!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the paperwork arrived today and there is quite a lot of it. I haven't seen anything about PPI yet but will have a closer look. Having looked at the statements it seems to be -

 

Direct Debit Interest

Direct debit recall charge

Additional Interest yes if this is int on arrears or penalty fees

Direct debit recall

Direct debit receipt

Administration fee

Debt Counselling

Field Agent Inv:

Solicitor Interim Legal Fees

Redemption Cheque Blemain Finance

Income on early settlement

Solicitor Discharge Fee

Administration Discharge Fee

Repayment of administration charges

Repayment of fees and additional interest

Repayment of capital

Balance transfer on settlement.

Is there anything there that I should be taking note of?

 

 

not sure on the blue what they are

we'd have to see the actual statements. I think

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will scan some in.

 

The direct debt recall is always the same amount as the actual direct debit.

Additional interest seems to be every other month.

 

So for instance it says -

 

21/04/2005 Direct Debit - £187.31

 

17/05/2005 Interest - £136.21

Direct Debit - £187.31

Direct Debit Recall - £187.31

Additional Interest - £0.29

Direct Debit recall charge - £2.00

Installment due - £187.31

 

The interest adds to the balance, the direct debit reduces the balance, the direct debit recall then adds the same amount back to the balance, additional interest is then added along with a £2.00 charge and then it's time for £187.31 to be paid again, which it is, then a Direct debit recall which then adds that same amount back to the balance and on it goes.

 

When it lists additional interest, sometimes in that line the arrears balance is left empty and other times there is a figure there so I don't know does that mean the one with the figure means the additional interest is being charged on the arrears.

It goes from 2004 to 2007.

 

When it starts getting to 2006 there doesn't seem to be any direct debit recalls but there are Direct Debit receipts.

That also seems to be when there's £40.00 admin fees everywhere and the additional interest ends up well over £40 every time rather than prior where it always seems to be under £1. The individual statements also have an arrears column so I don't know how that fits into it.

 

Also at the end of the paperwork there is a transaction summary but there's a lot of things in the individual statements not listed there like a Reactive Fee Due (LRO) so I don't know

do I trust their transaction summary or go through everything individually?

 

Also a lot of statements are sent multiple times.

Sometimes It will be a 30 day statement, sometimes it's 3 months and in one case I've seen it goes for almost a year so I could end up looking at the same statement 3 times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in simple words

that's GE for you!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to scan the statements just now because the first 3 statements cover a few months but there's dates on them and charges which don't show up on them all.

 

The last one covers I think 3 months but there's things on that 3 month statement which don't appear on the individual statement for that month.

 

I'll redact any info needing redacting and put them into a PDF file.

 

There is a letter mentioning repossession but it didn't go ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean to repo didn't go ahead

did they raise the claim but your dad sorted it in court or before it got that far?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...