Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Seahorse v Barclaycard


Seahorse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, I'd better get a thread started in preparation for getting my info back from Barclaycard. S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'d, so I'll sit back and wait.

 

Don't think I'd have ever questioned that I could badger BC about unlawful charges if it hadn't been for Cabot buying the account and chasing me for the alleged outstanding amount.

 

You never know, though. I might actually owe Cabot something, but as I'd been paying BC for years without the oustanding amount ever reducing, I have a suspicion it might be BC who owes ME money. Depends on how much was unlawful charges I suppose. We'll see.

 

And if BC cn't produce the info, and Cabot can't show me an agreement ever existed? Well, we shall see.

 

Seahorse

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

HOORAY!!! I'm home at last, and I have my SAR bundle from Barclaycard at last.

 

Awww, Bless. They have only sent me statements from 2001. And they tell me that this is ALL they hold on me.

 

OK, opening balance was £3126.06. Quite how they have managed to arrive at that figure, I have no idea. Apparently they don't have any statements prior to this, nor do they have any application form (which I KNOW is nonsense cos they supplied one to Cabot), agreement, or any other supporting documantation. So that'll be a complaint off to the ICO then.

 

Right, I've paid them £2,350 since the opening balance date. Now, since they can't prove I ever owed them over £3k in 2001, I'll just ignore that. And I'll ignore the interest they ever added, as they can't show me ever having agreed to paying them any interest. Oh, and I'd like the £2,350 back too, please. I have no idea why you ever thought you were entitled to it.

 

Unless, of course, you manage to find some more documentation after all, BC? But how could you... apparently this is all you hold. Either way you lose, don't you?

 

Well, well. This doesn't bode well for Cabot. It looks like Cabot have bought an account where the original creditor actually owes the supposed debtor a considerable amount of money.

 

I think I have quite a good bargaining chip here. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, it looks like Barclaycard have breached the DPA on two counts. Firstly, I specifically denied them permission to share my data when I signed my original application form. By selling my account on to Cabot, it would appear that they may have illegally shared that data. VERY serious.

 

I also managed to get a SAR sent again, and signed for this time. To be fair, they did respond withing 40 days. However, they quite categorically state that the only data they hold on me, are statements from 2001. Quite clearly this is incorrect, as they managed to send Cabot a copy of my application form, and copies of default notices. So are they lying, or just mistaken. I suppose I should really give them a chance to rectify any possible mistake, as I'm just filing in a complaint to the ICO just now.

 

So the story so far is, they don't have any sort of agreement, they can't show why the opening balance on the first statement they have is over £3k, I've paid them money they have no lawful right to, and they appear to have illegally sold my data on, as well as selling the account with an incorrect figure in any case. Oh, and defaulted me on several occasions, but can't show that they ever sent any default notices.

 

How deep is that poo? Way past their ears, methinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, here's the letter that I sent to BC on 3rd August.

 

Data Protection Team

Dept LRC

Barclaycard

Northampton

NN4 7SG

Data Protection Act 1998 Full Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

  1. I formally request that you forward me a true record of any Data held by your organisation relating to myself for the complete term of the above account. I require also any information that relates to any activity with your agents, Mercers.
  2. I am also aware this request should include any Data held for more than 6 years, as under the Data Protection Act 1998, there is no time limit for information requested.
  3. If you do not hold Data for a period longer than 6 years I also request confirmation of this in writing along with your methods used for disposal of such information to comply with the Data Protection Act stating the name and contact information of your registered Data Controller and Code Compliance Officer.
  4. Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you. If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your writing.
  5. Specifically, I require true and accurate statements of account; it is not simply sufficient to send me details of a breakdown of charges applied to my account.
  6. I also require you to supply me with a copy of the “Goodbye” letter that you purportedly sent to me upon assignment of this account to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited (formerly known as Kings Hill No. 1 Limited). I will NOT accept a copy supplied to you by any company within the Cabot Group of Companies. I require the true copy as produced by Barclaycard. If the “Goodbye” letter did NOT originate from Barclaycard, I require that you tell me so, and confirm whether or not any agreement exists between Barclaycard and Cabot that gives Cabot the right to produce and send such a letter on behalf of Barclaycard.
  7. I also require that you furnish me with details of whether or not Barclaycard retain the duties of the Original Agreement allegedly signed by myself, or whether the rights AND duties were transferred to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited upon assignment of this account. To assist in this request, a copy of the Deed of Assignment of the account from Barclaycard to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited will be more than adequate.
  8. If there exists an agreement which fulfils all conditions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, I anticipate that this will be included as part of the data that you hold about me.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days from receipt of this request in which to return to me the information requested, securely and in legible condition.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know promptly. However, please note that the above address is the one registered with Barclaycard, and which you have previously found to be acceptable.

I was advised by one of your team recently, a Mr Brian Atkinson, that I have no right in law to request this information. I trust that Mr Atkinson was merely confused as to Barclaycard’s duties under the Data Protection Act 1998, and that you will have no trouble whatsoever in complying with this request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And here's their reply...

 

Data Protection Act 1998 - Subject Access Request

 

Further to your recent request for personal information held by Barclaycard, please find enclosed a copy of the card statements you have requested.

 

Statements held prior to May 2004 are stored on microfilm which is a means of storage that does not fall within the definition of "relevant filing system" under the Data Protection Act 1998. ("the Act") nor within the bounds of what we are obliged to provide in response to your data subject access request as set out on the Information Commisioner's website at Information Commissioner's Office - ICO

 

The Information Commissioner has indicated his intetion to amend this guidance. It is therefore as a gesture of goodwill to you, our customer, and in light of this proposed change that we enclose copies of our pre May 2004 statements as you requested although we take a different view to the Information Commisioner's Office on whether these fall within the definition of "relevant filing system" as set out in the Act.

 

This information we have enclosed relating to this account is all that we hold.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Sameira Arshad

 

Barclaycard Customer Services

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And I'm just about to post this off to them...

 

Barclaycard House

PO Box 5592

Northampton

NN4 1ZY

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:XXXX XXX XXX XXX

 

I wish to formally complain about the manner in which Barclaycard has dealt with my account in light of your response to my Subject Access Request (“S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)”) of 3rd August 2007.

 

You state that the copy statements of account are all the information that you hold relating to this account, and therefore by definition, relating to me as an individual. I have several grave concerns if this is so, and I am giving you this opportunity to rectify any mistake that might have been made when your response of 15th August 2007 was composed. Failing that, I shall have no option but to escalate my complaint to the relevant regulatory bodies, which may include the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Financial Services Authority and the Information Commissioner’s Office.

 

The basis of my complaint is as set out below.

 

You have failed to supply any documentation, other than copy statements commencing with a first payment on 3rd August 2001. In particular, you have failed to provide any copy of my original application form, credit agreement under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and copy of any default notice that might have been sent to me. As I have recently been supplied with further documentation by Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited (“Cabot”) other than that which you sent to me in response to my request, I believe your statement that “This information we have enclosed relating to this account is al that we hold” to be patently erroneous.

I am also aware that correspondence between Cabot and Barclaycard would have positively identified me as an individual, and therefore would have fallen under the scope of what should have been supplied in response to my SAR. Quite why this information should have been omitted, I can only speculate.

 

As you have failed to supply supporting documentation to show why the statements you have provided show an opening balance of £3,126.06, I am unable to accept that this balance was ever owed to Barclaycard. I am also confused as to why, in the absence of any sort of agreement, Barclaycard ever felt obliged to charge interest on this balance. Indeed, I am of the opinion that I was in error by paying Barclaycard a total of £2,350 between 3rd August 2001, and the date that Barclaycard saw fit to sell my account to Cabot.

 

I am aware that my original application form included an “opt out” box, which should have been ticked to indicate that I would consent to any sharing of my data. I am also aware that this box was not ticked, indicating that I expressly denied Barclaycard permission to share my data at all. At no point does the application form show that the intent of that section of the form meant anything other than any personal data, for whatever reason.

I am also aware that Terms and Conditions relating to the date that the application form was signed, clearly state that Barclaycard will not share my data without seeking my permission first.

 

As no such consent was ever given, and could not possibly have been implied in light of my indication to refuse such consent when I signed my application form, I would like Barclaycard to justify to me why Barclaycard considered they had any right to pass my data on to Cabot in any way. It is my belief that such by selling my data in this way, Barclaycard have committed a serious breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. Further, if Barclaycard have omitted to provide me with all data that they hold about me in response to my SAR, then that to constitutes another breach of the Act, as Barclaycard were allowed 40 days to respond by sending me all the data that I requested.

 

I am also concerned that without any supporting evidence, Barclaycard have been receiving payments for a debt which would have been entirely unenforceable. I am of the opinion that any payments made to Barclaycard are therefore recoverable.

 

I would be grateful for a satisfactory response to this complaint within 7 days. If no such reply is forthcoming, or is unsatisfactory in nature, I shall have no option other than to escalate my complaint as indicated earlier. You should note that I have not yet at this stage ruled out legal action in relation to this matter.

 

However, I would like to offer a concession at this point. I am prepared to accept, as a goodwill gesture, the sum of £2,350, being the amount paid to Barclaycard from the date of the first statement as supplied by Barclaycard. If Barclaycard feel that this is fair under the circumstances, I would be willing to consider this complaint to be satisfactorily concluded.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bless 'em, they're so used to just sending out statements for people reclaiming charges that they forget some of us want to know the full story.

 

The poor chap from DHL had to make two trips to me!

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't understand their thinking. They KNOW I asked for more than just statements. But the deny having any more than what they sent. Yet they MUST know that I know they sent more than this to Cabot.

 

What I expect is one of two things. They'll say as the account has been sold to Cabot, they now have all the information (and so blows Cabot's No Duties bollix out the water), or they'll say the default notices came from Mercers. Perhaps I need to SAR them too.

 

A lot of people will need to start getting ther stories right here. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Time's up for them. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt because of the postal strike. But if I've heard nothing by Monday, I'll be making a few complaints. Why do they have to make life so difficult for themselves? In fact, why do they have to lie like a counterfeit Rolex? Do they think nobody will question them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...