Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5964 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, hope i am on the correct section to post a thread about GE Capital Woodchester. after going throught this great site got me thinking about claiming charges back (which range from £33.84 to £45.12) for returned unpaid. we had a account with GE Capital Woodchester and looking back at some of the statments from 27/04/2001 we have right upto 01/06/2004 but have lost some of the more recent one's. looking around this site i have got myself a little lost. this is how i see the way to get the ball rolling please correct me if i am wrong

1) get all statments if not send a S.A.R. wait for the staments to come

2) work out on a spreadsheet the amount taken. write back to GE Capital Woodchester and send a prrliminary letter along with the spreadsheet.

3) if they pay all well and good, if not prepare and issue a N1

dose that about sum it up?

Cheers

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi phildux

 

Welcome to the 'other institutions' thread - yes, you are in the right place for GE Money.

 

Youseem to have th egeneral idea pretty well. The only thing is you should add a setp between 2) and 3) and send an LBA if they don't respond positively to your prelim letter within 14 days.

 

On item 1) there is often a problem with GE Money in that their admin systems are completely useless. Do nont be surpriosed if they cannot find your statements either. How many of the more recent ones have you lost. If you have most with just a few gaps, then youcan probably estimate the charges - that's what I did.

 

Anyway, you should start with 1) and see how you go. Keep us informed and we'll be here to help.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply, i have from april 2001 to march 2004. so its from april 2004 to july last year (2006) when it ended that i am missing, they must have these as i think i read somewhere they have to keep 6 years worth by law. the loan was with GE Capital Woodchester is GE Money the same outfit?. Have you a full postal address i would need to send my S.A.R and maybe a contact name would be good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE Capital Wooodchester is Part of GE Money, address

 

GE Capital Bank plc

PO Box 700

Leeds

LS99 2BD

 

I don't know that HFC have stoppd trading - what 'product' does it involve?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven thanks for the reply, still trying to get my head around this, but I think it might be starting to sink in, why at step 1 do you have to give them 40 days? can you give an answer to the red highlighted. Is there anything I have missed out

Steps to claim back bank charges/ overdraft fees etc. (as I see it)

1) Gather all statement together, if you don’t have these issue a S.A.R. and wait for a reply (you must give them 40 days to reply) if they don’t reply within the 40 days issue a non compliance form allow 14 days for this to be answered. If they do reply go to step 2 (what should be done if they do not answer the non compliance form for the request of the S.A.R)

2) Work out on a spreadsheet the amount owing. Do not include any interest at this stage. Send out a Preliminary Letter with a Schedule of charges (spreadsheet) allow 14 days for this to be replied to, if no reply issue a Letter before Action (LBA) allow 7 days for them to answer the LBA

3) If no answer or not satisfied with there reply prepare and issue N1

Cheers

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer really depends on what you get from them. If a few statements are missing (which is quite common) you may be able toestimate teh charges. If it's a lot that are missing, you may have to do something else- cross that bridge when you come to it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...