Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

akinika chasing TVL debt


Andrewgrizz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I got a letter from akinika saying tv licensing have past on my debt balance of £28.50.

 

 

I not sure what to do about This,

do I need to contact this company and arrange suitable payments which would include further payments towards tv licence.

 

 

They say if I don't pay an enforcement officer will visit.

 

 

That won't be easy as I live in flats and security don't let unauthorised visitors to access flats.

 

 

I am unemployed.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that akinika is a debt collecting company. Is that correct? Is the debt balance of £28.50 correct? Are they adding on any charges et cetera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

akinika are IQOR DCA

ignore them deal with TVL direct

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

 

have you been paying TVL and stopped?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for reply.

 

 

Akinika say do not contact TVL direct as they will refer me to them.

 

 

I forgot To keep up my payments,

 

 

I budget for other household costs and TVL gets forgotten.

I will contact TVL and explain.

Thank you for your advice I appreciate it. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

you DO NOT entertain akinika

they have no legal powers WHATSOEVER.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not bother contacting TVL you just get through to a CAPITA robot who will tell you nothing of any use. If you are in a position to pay the remainder of your TVL balance then pay it - at the Post Office or on line, however you do it.

 

Far be it from me to advise you to do anything illegal in the future but for future TVL you live in a block of flats, if you are above ground level and your flat cannot be seen from the outside and you have secure entry then I would be considering going licence free. If you only watch catch up and TV via other means than live broadcasts you don't need a licence. You are not obliged to tell TVL this, just don't renew your licence when the time comes and be armed with knowledge should they ever doorstep you.

 

Remember that TVL have no right of entry and should they doorstep you, say nothing, literally nothing, do not confirm your name ever to anyone who doorsteps you and asks you your name before they have told you who they are, shut the door on them, all their threats are meaningless. Please don't listen to Freeman Of The Land nonsense on the internet, it is wrong and will only get you in trouble with TVL - best course of action is no contact and give them no information, door slammed in their face is best option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you DO NOT entertain akinika

they have no legal powers WHATSOEVER.

 

I contacted TVL they are not interested in helping me, they say my debt was passed to akinikia, and I have to deal with them, even though I have not previously been told my debt was being passed to a debt collector.

looks like I have no choice but to deal with akinika, even though I told TVL that they won't get any money from debt collector, and that includes any thing owing after paying my small debt.

Thanks for your advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore the dca

pay tvl directly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...