Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

10 year old mortgage shortfall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

We have a mortgage shortfall that we have been paying for almost ten years,

the original debt was 15k and we have paid almost 9K off.

 

We have always struggled to make the payment they want but have never missed or been late.

 

Is there any thing we can do to ask them to write the remaining debt off?

 

Just wondered whether there were any template letters to request this or if they're likely to say enough is enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they still adding interest ?

 

Do you receive an annual statement ?

 

Are you paying the mortgage company or a debt collection agency ?

 

When did the mortgage shortfall occur and when did you start repaying it ?

 

More info is needed so appropriate advice can be given. Having paid £9k towards this debt, if you say you are struggling, they will just extend the repayment period to reduce the monthly amount required. They might not accept a lump sum to pay the balance off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi uncle Bulgaria, the house was repossessed in 2007

and we are paying a debt collection company

and have been since 2008

as far as we are aware they aren't adding any interest.

 

 

Over the years they have offered lump sum payment options but we can never afford them.

 

Every couple of years they ask us to pay more

and we just upped the payments whether we could afford to or not.

 

 

So it's now 100 quid a month on a 5k debt.

We don't get annual statements

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be getting annual statements as far as I know.

 

The debt collection agency will be collecting on behalf of the mortgage company.

They might be adding interest,

but it is a bit naughty if they have not told you this and are not sending statements.

 

I think you should ask them for a statement of account.

 

Also was there any issue with the repossession and how the lender sold the property to minimise any debt ?

 

 

Have you ever asked for copies of all paperwork to ensure a proper process was followed ?

If not, it might be worth doing so via Subject Access Request to the Bank.

 

 

It might strengthen your arm if you are looking to negotiate a write off of any sum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this,

when the house was sold we did argue that they had sold it for less than market value,

they sold it at auction and accepted a one and only bid that was 25k below what they had marketed it at previously.

 

We tried to complain and we were told to shut up and pay.

 

At the time we were defeated and depressed so blindly accepted what we were told and started paying.

 

I'm right in thinking that the only time we get an up to date figure is when they ask for bigger repayments.

 

The mortgage company was alliance and Leicester so do we ask santander for info?

 

The only paperwork we ever got was a breakdown of how they had worked out the shortfall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you paying a DCA?

 

who got the repo

they're the ones you should be paying

 

not some powerless DCA.

 

full story please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if discounts are being offered something smells bigtime here

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Soooooo........

 

Our house was repossessed,

we didn't contest it,

handed the keys back to the judge, very bad times.

 

The judge told a+l that they were to give us 6 months after the house was sold before asking for any shortfall payments.

 

We then heard nothing from a+l

the next communication was from a company called sanclare.

 

They sent us a letter asking for 15k but if we paid it straight away we could settle for 5k.

 

We did try to argue that they sold the house too cheaply and we weren't liable for that amount but they were having none of it.

They sent a breakdown of how they arrived at 15k and we started paying.

 

Fast forward a couple of years and we're down to 12.5k and they offer to settle for 3750.

 

That's all we've had from them,

haven't heard anything since 2015

when they asked us to up the payment to 100 a month or else,

we did and that's pretty much it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should send a subject access request to Santander or whoever has the records for this mortgage repossession.

 

You might well have a valid complaint that they did not obtain best price, if they accepted an auction bid below any reserve that was set. Also they really should have looked at putting it up for sale with Estate Agents.

 

https://www.cml.org.uk/consumers/payment-difficulties/what-to-do-if-repossession-occur/#1

 

And according to CML, you should be sent annual statements.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god no not sanclare.financial

 

you've been had blind

satans bank or more correctly A+L wouldnt have known nothing about this.

 

sanclare.used to trawl the court rolls and send out spoof letters to people who were recently repo'd threatening all sorts unless they paid.

 

hence to fact they were and have been offering enormous discounts.

 

nd I bet not one of their letters mentioned A+L had sold them the debt at all...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's sadly the usual outcome yes

 

they were ultimately owned by 1st credit.

 

there used to be about 5 guys

 

Enquiries,

E-mail: [email protected]

 

UK & European Sales,

John McLellan

E-mail: [email protected] .uk

Mobile:+44 (0)7734 555934

 

Managing Director,

Adrian O'Connor Mitchell

E-mail: adrian.oconnormitchell@sa nclare.co.uk

Mobile:+44 (0)7929 208575

 

Chief Operating Officer,

Graham Fryer

E-mail: [email protected]. uk

Telephone:+44 (0)845 226 9140

Mobile:+44 (0)7816 512852

 

Commercial Director,

Mark Weston

E-mail: [email protected] k

Telephone:+44 (0)845 226 9140

Mobile:+44 (0)7969 630927

 

UK Client Manager,

Robert Hardy

E-mail: [email protected]. uk

Telephone:+44 (0)845 226 9140

Mobile:+44 (0)7921 970611

Fax:+44 (0)845 226 9145

 

UK Office:

200 Winch Road

Kent Science Park

Sittingbourne

Kent ME9 8EF

UK

 

UK Registered Office:

St Mary's House

42 Vicarage Crescent

Battersea

London SW11 3LD

UK

 

But typically all letters were from a Mr Clement

what they used to do is when they [acting for 1st credit]

were taking various debtors to court on speculative claimforms

looking for non contested default judgements

they used to look at the court rolls in the same court

and note down any repo cases.

 

they knew that the mortgage lending council as ref'd above had told lenders to back off shall we say.

 

so after a few months

they'd write and demand payment on the shortfall knowing that the lenders wouldnt have made any contact at all.

giving an enormous discount but only if people rang and asked for Mr Clement within 7days

 

when said calls came, and as Mr Clement didn't actually exist

they knew a mug was at the end of the line awaiting to be fleeced.

 

I believe someone was actually fined or whatever many years ago for the practice.

 

now I'm not saying you are one

 

but ...

 

have you ANY paperwork at all?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan them up to one multipage pdf please

follow the upload

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I was thinking of attack

but we need to be sure on all of this.

 

 

like do you actually know if the shortfall was sold on by A+L?

you should have received a notice of assignment and alike?

 

 

were you to say sar A+L who I believe all documentation is held by Santander now

it could well throw up £1000's of reclaimable fees and PPI etc?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've never had any contact from a and l or santander.

 

They did sell on a credit card I had with them which the company who purchased it stopped collecting payments on a couple of years ago.

Other than that we've never heard from them.

 

I've read that the sb limit on mortgages is 12 years rather than six

so if that's the case I'd rather cut our losses and run so to speak.

 

We should probably have taken proper legal advice at the time of the shortfall and not blindly paid someone who asked for it.

Bad times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not 12 years for all -

 

6 yearslink3.gif its a shortfall

if no contact should not be asked to pay it back as per the CML rules

 

also they there should be no interest on it

 

I think a SARlink3.gif is needed

 

 

need to see these letters you have

then we might be able to make a case to get ALL your moneyback.

 

 

your story is far from complete without them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...