Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty car in first 30 days


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter bought a 2010 Alfa gillietta for 3700 from a dealer nearby to us last month with advert stating service and cambelt needed doing so budgeted for this to be done.

 

Service carried out by Alfa specialist who stated that the clutch was going and needed to be replaced for 300-500 as budget price.

They said dealer should cover this as within 30 days

 

I drove the car myself and its very hard to get in reverse gear(not like this when test driven)

I spoke to dealer who said he would offer 100 toward it,

I pointed out as in first 30 days he had to repair it or we could reject the car,

he does not want to know

 

Sent letter recorded yesterday just seeing what's next step ,

also he trying to say he's not a dealer but has a garage for repairing cars on industrial unit with the ad saying trade on eBay plus he currently has 3 cars on for sale on eBay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get all the evidence of his dealing et cetera. It may be useful but it's not essential.

 

You are quite right to have asserted your right to reject within 30 days.

 

I think that the next thing you need to do is to get rid of the car. That means taking it round to him and leaving it on his property – not on the street – and making sure that you have a witness with you as to the condition of the car. Take photographs all around it and inside it as you leave it. If you manage to do this then make sure that all the paperwork is sorted out including contacting DVLA making sure that you are no longer seen as the owner.

 

You need to be meticulous about this. You don't want to find that the dealer has later on taken the car out onto the road and parked it somewhere and that you are then identified as the current owner.

 

However, the best thing to do is to be cautious and not cancel the insurance on it for the moment until you know that the whole thing is sorted out. That might be some time.

 

You have contacted the dealer and he says that he is not interested in helping you or respecting your statutory rights.

 

The only thing to do now is to issue a letter before action – giving him 14 days – and then sue. If you're not prepared to do this then don't send the letter but I don't really know what else you can do with a shady dealer who clearly doesn't want to return your money.

 

If you do sue then you will be able to recover your other reasonable expenses including the cost of the service.

 

It might be useful to contact the office specialist and get a written opinion as to the condition of the car and is to the existing defect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case get to or even three independent quotes for the repair work. Write to the dealer and tell him that in view of his uncooperative attitude you are going to have the work done elsewhere stop you are enclosing 2/3 independent quotes and you will be putting the car in for repairs by the cheapest one. Give him seven day opportunity to inspect the car. I strongly recommend that you do not have it inspected by him on his premises. Have it inspected at your premises or at some other independent garage.

 

He may well say okay he is prepared to do the work – but I strongly recommend against that because you will end up with a job of questionable quality and it will simply draw the matter out. You need to get the car away from him and repaired by an independent person that you trust.

 

Although you should be looking around for reasonable quotes, this does not mean that you need cowboy garages. I suggest that you get the three quotes from fully authorised competent dealers with good reputations. Check mark on the Internet first of all and make sure that the work you are getting will be properly detailed and guaranteed.

 

If the supplier of the car will not cooperate then have the work done. Arrange the all parts which are removed must be returned to you and sue the dealer for the money plus any ancillary expenses plus interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on a second, if the clutch was dodgy then all gears would be difficult to select. I think you need a second opinion first as to whether the clutch is faulty or not. And by second opinion I mean an approved Alfa outlet, not some specialist or other garage then if they confirm it you might have something to go on. The fact that you state it's only reverse suggests it could just be an adjustment that's needed to the gear change mechanism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just an update on the car, we sent a recorded letter to his business address , this was not delivered and came back to local post office so take it he refused to sign.

Car was repaired yesterday by garage we use for 800 as mass flywheel had failed also (part of clutch setup) which is a common issue on modern cars

So will issue money claim online and see how this goes

Link to post
Share on other sites

This does not suggest a clutch problem but a gear linkage adjustment issue. Most selector mechanism from the selector arm or rod are done by cable which often drift out of adjustment. By changing the clutch and Dual mass flywheel (which incidentally is the totally incorrect repair) they would have had to re-adjust the linkage. And you think the dealer has ripped you off???

I'd be going after your repairer for incompetence frankly.

 

 

Very few cars have problem with the DMF, there were some early issues but these have all been resolved.

 

 

Total and utter balderdash and I hope the dealer defends robustly!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...