Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A fixed penalty with wrong address


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5576 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got a fixed penalty for using a mobile phone just as i was pulling into Sainsburys car park Loanhead Midlothian. The address the officer put on the slip is spelt wrong. Do i still have to pay the fine or is it invalid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were pulling in, it might be on private land. Is the address a public road? Anyone here think that's a goer?

 

What evidence is there?

 

A minor spelling mistake probably won't be enough, imo.

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a link to where it happened.

 

Google Maps

 

Take road to store from main r/about (straiton park)

left at first r/about to smaller r/about.

take the right turn to store.

It was between the small roundabout and the entrance to carpark.

 

The Officer has only put location as Loanhead.

I would have thought it would need to be in more detail than that.

 

Hope this helps

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

first the key factor is when he first saw you, where were you when you put phone to ear etc,

 

if you were below the red line in the pic then you could claim it was on private property, but remember that the law states NO HANDHELD PHONE,

 

to be honest you will have a fight, proving you did NOT use it on a public highway

 

car_park.jpg

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was the other small roundabout at the top right corner so its way off the main road ( straiton park ).

 

The only evidence is there were 3 police officers.

me the wife and kids.

Its my first offence i tried to use that as a OOOPPPSSS sorry but to no avail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you admitted it to 3 police officers? Ooops indeed :D.

It would depend where the private land started, at the 1st or 2nd roundabout, if the private land thing was to be a factor at all.

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He could have only saw me where i was on the small roundabout and he was coming out of the carpark.As thats where i starteds the call silly me.

I thought i was fine as the place was empty apart from me and the police lol

Not 2 fussy if i have to pay but there are mistakes being made here.

Clerical errors on the paper work.

and i thought private property being a car park...

 

 

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure an officer can fine you for using a mobile whilst driving even on private land.

 

Nope, the offence only exists on the public highway.

 

In this particular case, whether you were on Sainsbury's private land or not will be irrelevant - as the public has unrestricted access to the car park and its approach roads, it is, within the meaning of the Road Traffic Act, public highway. Ownership of the land/road does not affect this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so the private land seems useless so what about the mistake of wrong address or is this just being stupid of me.

Its my first offence anyway in 20yrs so 3 points on a clean license i suppose is not 2 bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so the private land seems useless so what about the mistake of wrong address or is this just being stupid of me.

Its my first offence anyway in 20yrs so 3 points on a clean license i suppose is not 2 bad.

 

AN FPN is nothing more or less than an invitation to admit guilt for the offence and pay a fixed penalty without the need or costs (for both sides) of a Court appearance.

 

If you complain about the incorrect address, all that will happen is that they will issue a new FPN (which they are entitled to do) or they will pass the matter for issue of a summons to Court. Even if the mistake is transferred to the summons, the existence of the 'slip rule' will allow minor corrections on the day.

 

In my view, you were caught acting illegally, and in front of 3 Police Officers - pay it, accept the points and move on (Don't forget to tell your insurers)

Link to post
Share on other sites

AN FPN is nothing more or less than an invitation to admit guilt for the offence and pay a fixed penalty without the need or costs (for both sides) of a Court appearance.

 

If you complain about the incorrect address, all that will happen is that they will issue a new FPN (which they are entitled to do) or they will pass the matter for issue of a summons to Court. Even if the mistake is transferred to the summons, the existence of the 'slip rule' will allow minor corrections on the day.

 

In my view, you were caught acting illegally, and in front of 3 Police Officers - pay it, accept the points and move on (Don't forget to tell your insurers)

 

 

Fair comment thanks for all the replies.

 

 

Ive got a couple of weeks to pay the £60 fine.

 

 

Again thank you all for looking.

 

 

kenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...