Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

being accused of theft with no evidence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there, im having some serious problems at work, yesterday i was called in for a meeting with the deputy manager, where he had a list of alleged breaches of contract i've committed. I work as a fitness instructor/personal trainer in a gym. Allegedly a woman gave me an envolpe with money in for a membership £29, one evening, they are saying that i stole it, however i was never given any envelope at all. Secondly they are saying that i personal trained someone for £30 and didnt put it thnrough the system where at the end of the month we recieve 70% of £30 in our pay, again this never took place. They have no evidence of anything as there are no cameras and nobody saw any of these things happen.

 

Earlier this year, there was trouble when an employee/manager sent an e-mail to someone forgetting to take me off the cc list, it read "i realy hate him", then a few months later that same person admitted to desroying the original copies of my training certificates., i telephoned the training company and got a letter telling me it would cost £60 for them, fine, the compny said they would get me new ones.......2 months later after me chasing them up....no certificates. This obviously stops me getting another job in the industry as i cannot prove my qujalifications witnout the certificates. Is this all classd as bullying? What can i do? I have a disciplinary on tuesday 2pm, where i think they will try to sack me.

 

Any help is much appreiated

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say they have no evidence, does this mean that both women who claim to of handed you cash have not made a statement to your company?

 

Regarding your certs, I would ring the training company and find out if your company has contacted them about them being replaced. If they haven't and as they are important to your future I would get them myself.

Edited by version302003
Link to post
Share on other sites

well im not sure if they have been given a written statement by these women but i was told that neither of them want their names known and i have been shown no proof of anything at all, its all their word against mine, fact is i did nopt take any envelope or train this fictional other woman. The company is not doing well financially, so i think they're trying to get rid of me to save money. I will ask for the letter back that the training compny ent me and call them myelf however i totally refuse to pay £60 for certificates that were purposely destroyed by someone there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, how long have you worked there?

 

Secondly, how was the disciplinary hearing communicated to you and have you been given a right to have a colleague present? Have you received written details of the allegation against you? Their process in bringing disciplinary action may be fundamentally flawed.

 

Your response to any allegation should be utter indignation and you should categorically deny any wrongdoing. Insofar as an allegation of theft is concerned you need far more detail than a mere allegation from persons unknown and if they are prepared to pursue this without corroboration then I would demand that the Police be involved. You are entitled to degree of mutual trust from your employer and if these allegations cannot be borne out by CCTV or witness corroboration then the employer should afford you the benefit of the doubt or else suggest why they have reasonable grounds to suspect that the allegation is true. For your part you should be prepared to highlight your unblemished work record, previously unquestioned integrity (responsibility for much larger amounts of money than £30 here and there) and the fact that such allegations have been made are completely without foundation.

 

Is there a record anywhere of what you were actually doing when the woman has suggested that you were giving her a private session? Was anybody else on duty at that time who might back this up?

 

You also need to raise a written grievance about the destruction of your certificates. If the member of staff is responsible it will be difficult to go back to him personally but it would be helpful if you have any written evidence of the company's agreement that they would replace them. Use that or if not then name names to complain that despite their assurance that they would replace your property, they have failed to do so.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks sidewinder, here are the answers to your questions.

 

 

Firstly, how long have you worked there?

 

 

I have worked there about 8 months

Secondly, how was the disciplinary hearing communicated to you and have you been given a right to have a colleague present? Have you received written details of the allegation against you? Their process in bringing disciplinary action may be fundamentally flawed.

 

The disciplinary procedure was communicated by taking me into the deputy managers office and asking me about the allegations. Then they told me they were suspending me on full pay from that minute and that I had to leave the premises. I was told that a letter would be delivered to my house by hand, which it was, my mum went to the door and took the letter, there was no receipt signed though. The letter contained the allegations but no specific details or details of evidence.

 

Your response to any allegation should be utter indignation and you should categorically deny any wrongdoing. Insofar as an allegation of theft is concerned you need far more detail than a mere allegation from persons unknown and if they are prepared to pursue this without corroboration then I would demand that the Police be involved. You are entitled to degree of mutual trust from your employer and if these allegations cannot be borne out by CCTV or witness corroboration then the employer should afford you the benefit of the doubt or else suggest why they have reasonable grounds to suspect that the allegation is true. For your part you should be prepared to highlight your unblemished work record, previously unquestioned integrity (responsibility for much larger amounts of money than £30 here and there) and the fact that such allegations have been made are completely without foundation.

 

 

Where I work there are no CCTV cameras in the gym, and as far as I am aware they are not claiming that anything was seen either, apart from this woman saying that she gave me the envelope....which never happened. Also I have cashed up for the last 6 months or so on my own and no money has ever gone missing before, usually there is at least £50 in the till, sometimes a couple of hundred pounds.

 

Is there a record anywhere of what you were actually doing when the woman has suggested that you were giving her a private session? Was anybody else on duty at that time who might back this up?

 

 

At the time they are alleging I took the envelope, there would have probably been no one else on duty, as the place is under-staffed and as I mentioned above, for the last 6 months I've been left on my own from about 7:30pm until closing at 10:00pm when I do the cashing up. As for the woman I've supposedly trained, they have not told me when it was or who it was, this is what I mean, there are no details or evidence.

You also need to raise a written grievance about the destruction of your certificates. If the member of staff is responsible it will be difficult to go back to him personally but it would be helpful if you have any written evidence of the company's agreement that they would replace them. Use that or if not then name names to complain that despite their assurance that they would replace your property, they have failed to do so.

 

I will look at the greivance procedure and write a letter regarding the certificates. I dont have any written evidence that they said they would replace them, could I ask now, or maybe they would refuse it now. I will be happy to name names as to who promised that my certificates would be replaced. They have had at least 2 months to get new ones.

Other things I were considering bringing up were general bullying, including the abusive e-mail (I have evidence), destruction of my property (have idmitted evidence), also another member of staff, the admin lady being abusive to me because keys were left in the till while I was upstairs, however when I went upstairs there was another member of staff still on shift and behind the desk with the keys, I reported this to my manager - whos the person that promised the new certificates.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that although by no means a foregone conclusion, I am a little worried that the lack of 12 months service may not work in your favour. With a year's service you would have additional protection which would mean that your employer has to be more careful when taking disciplinary action, as you would be able to take action for Unfair Dismissal if they were to get rid of you without good cause or without following correct procedure.

 

My advice is still the same - give them absolutely no doubt that you are innocent - however if your fears are correct and that this is an excuse for costcutting, there is little that you will be able to do if dismissal is the end result.

 

Please let us know how you get on.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent them a letter delivered by hand by my brother, they say I'm not allowed on the premises. The letter said that I was unable to attend the meeting scheduled for today as I have the flu (which I do) also due to the amount of notice I had been given (one day) I felt this was not long enough to prepare myself.

 

I provided them with 3 alternative dates which would be more appropriate. I also asked them for a copy of any written statements they had supporting these allegations and any other documentation they would be referring to in the forthcoming interview. Finally mentioned that I was not allowed sufficient time to get my personal belongings or a copy of the staff handbook which contains the disciplinary procedure.

 

My brother took this letter to the gym and asked for it to be passed to the deputy manager who is dealing with the issue. I got him to ask for the person taking the letter to write a receipt and sign it to prove it was given to them (didnt want them saying I just didnt turn up with nothing to let them know)

 

SO... a few hours ago there was a knock on my door, my mum answered it, it was someone handing her a letter from my work. They did not get her to sign anything, does this mean that technically they did not deliver it, as there is not proof that I received anything?

 

Their letter read:

 

"I am sorry to hear that you have the flu, and under these circumstances it is acceptable to delay our meeting in accordance with the statutory procedure.

 

I have re-arranged the meeting for Tuesday 30th December at 2pm. Enclosed is a copy of the Company disciplinary procedures. I have also enclosed a list of the dates in question and can confirm that I have a written statement to confirm these dates and the payments made. In fairness to the client, I am not prepared to send a copy to you, but will make a copy available to you at our meeting. In addition, I have enclosed my notes from the preliminary investigative meeting on the 20th December 2008"

 

(I was not told what I had to see then manager about and so I didnt take anyone else with me, however the manager had someone else there, is this right??)

 

I dont know what to do, shall I just send a resignation letter or should I go to the meeting?? I'm so angry with these people, its pure bullying and just trying to get rid of me, I never stole anything!

 

Any further help?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a totally unqualified commenter - I would say never resign if you may need to sign on for any benefits to tide you over. You will be seen to have put yourself out of a job.

 

I would stick to your guns - absolutely insist that you have done nothing wrong and then go after them for your certificates. That is absolutely disgraceful and there is no way you should be paying to replace them yourself (although you may well have to in the end). If they do sack you ask them for the £60 to be added to your final pay as an expense - or if you have an expenses claim form system - put a claim in and hand it to them during the meeting.

 

Also - don't let them get you down..... it's about whose face fits sometimes. You'll find somewhere were you will be appreciated in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stanroyal thanks for help, i know i cannot claim unfair dismissal as ive only been there 8 months, but is it too late to make a serious complaint about bullying, i mean brinmg back up the e-mail, certs, and accusing of stealing to whoever is above the person who sacks me? Also does it mean that because they apparently havbe statements these arfe seen as hard evidence and stand up, surely its no different from me writing on a peice of paper that the manager stole money? No proof..

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest telling them that unless they are prepared to produce at least 7 working days prior to any meeting a signed 'statement of truth' from your accusers you are not prepared to have a meeting without legal representation. Furthermore if they maintain their criminal libel you will yourself report the matter to the police after which you will sue for criminal libel the company, it's officers, managers & those individuals who are making highly distressing allegations of theft against you

 

Remind them that it is in itself a criminal offense to knowingly make false accusations of criminal behaviour against another

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trust me mate do not give in my company tried to do the exact same to me before i was there a year and i beat there ass in to the ground at the end of it all they done me on a reasonable belief because i shot all their evidence to the ground and In your case what i would do first is get yourself a union rep as the company are under a legal obligation to allow you representation to the meeting ask them for the witness statements as you need to see them before you are able to defend yourself as you re still unsure of the aligations brought against you and then all you have to do is cast doubt on the evidence and you will triumph and they will not be able to sack you as they will not have evidence just a belief which on its own is not reasonable grounds of termination and all though you have not been there a year they still have to abide by the law and you can still take them to a tribunial if they fail to follow their end of the contract so make sure you go over all their policies with a fine tooth comb and use it to your advantage. good luck mate :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trust me mate do not give in my company tried to do the exact same to me before i was there a year and i beat there ass in to the ground at the end of it all they done me on a reasonable belief because i shot all their evidence to the ground and In your case what i would do first is get yourself a union rep as the company are under a legal obligation to allow you representation to the meeting ask them for the witness statements as you need to see them before you are able to defend yourself as you re still unsure of the aligations brought against you and then all you have to do is cast doubt on the evidence and you will triumph and they will not be able to sack you as they will not have evidence just a belief which on its own is not reasonable grounds of termination and all though you have not been there a year they still have to abide by the law and you can still take them to a tribunial if they fail to follow their end of the contract so make sure you go over all their policies with a fine tooth comb and use it to your advantage. good luck mate :D

 

 

Goodness me, what a load of........

 

Your employer can dismiss you without giving a reason within the first 12 months, so long as its not discriminatory on grounds of race, pregnancy etc, so all this talk of 'not be able to sack you' is just nonsense. The OP knows this.

 

Having said that, you must defend yourself vigorously if you are innocent. You may still end up out of a job but at least you will know you werent dismissed because of theft.

 

Make the employer produce evidence, not allegations. It will be impossible for them to have evidence if you are innocent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness me, what a load of........

 

Your employer can dismiss you without giving a reason within the first 12 months, so long as its not discriminatory on grounds of race, pregnancy etc, so all this talk of 'not be able to sack you' is just nonsense. The OP knows this.

 

Having said that, you must defend yourself vigorously if you are innocent. You may still end up out of a job but at least you will know you werent dismissed because of theft.

 

Make the employer produce evidence, not allegations. It will be impossible for them to have evidence if you are innocent.

 

What are you talking about i know exactly what i am talking about. I was getting accused of fraud which i did not do so please tell me how they can sack you without going through the proper process. They cannot just dismiss you at any time. That is just stupid to even think that they could just fire you and that is that they have to give a reason and it has to be a good one just because you cannot take them to a tribunial does not mean that there are not other things you can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you talking about i know exactly what i am talking about. I was getting accused of fraud which i did not do so please tell me how they can sack you without going through the proper process. They cannot just dismiss you at any time. That is just stupid to even think that they could just fire you and that is that they have to give a reason and it has to be a good one just because you cannot take them to a tribunial does not mean that there are not other things you can do.

 

p_cas is right. Anyone can be dismissed for any reason or no reason at all. Of course that does not make it right and if the dismissal was unfair(more than 12mths service), wrong or discriminatory then their would be reapercussions at an ET. However the dismissal would have still taken place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you know, just from reading his thread, it seems to me that the employer just wants rid of them, and is using the alledged theft as a convenient excuse.

thing is though, if no conclusive evidence of theft can be produced, but yet in their correspondance they make reference to it, then you could get them for libel, regardless if you end up dismissed or not, as being dismissed form a job on the grounds of unsubstaniated theft can leave you with a black smear on your character, and thus could lead to problems in the future.

 

not really helpful i know, but its a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have to give a reason and it has to be a good one

 

With 8 months service you have no statutory right to reasons for dismissal unless you are pregnant or on mat leave etc at the effective date of termination ERA 1996, s.92(3).

 

Good practice would of course be for them to let you know written reasons, but if you submitted a request for such, they would be under no legal obligation to comply.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

the company are under a legal obligation to allow you representation to the meeting

 

Sorry, no.

 

The right exists to be accompanied and for the person who accompanies you to act as a witness to the meeting. There is no right to representation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I am in a similar position myself but just not on the same scale at all. I work in a cafe and my boss made a sarcastic comment to me today about a piece of honeycomb missing from one cake. Im not stupid and I know she was accusing me of taking it. I'm not a thief and I'm really upset that after a year and their longest serving member of staff that I'd be accused of such a little thing like that. Either way you look at it, theft is theft and thats what i've been accused of whether it was £1000 or a piece of honeycomb from a cake. Maybe I'm over reacting but I am really upset about it...

 

I asked a fellow staff member about it and they said they had no idea. I'm really stuck with what to do.

 

my boss has no proof it was me. has she got the right to accuse me of doing something like theft without any proof?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in a similar position myself but just not on the same scale at all. I work in a cafe and my boss made a sarcastic comment to me today about a piece of honeycomb missing from one cake. Im not stupid and I know she was accusing me of taking it. I'm not a thief and I'm really upset that after a year and their longest serving member of staff that I'd be accused of such a little thing like that. Either way you look at it, theft is theft and thats what i've been accused of whether it was £1000 or a piece of honeycomb from a cake. Maybe I'm over reacting but I am really upset about it...

 

I asked a fellow staff member about it and they said they had no idea. I'm really stuck with what to do.

 

my boss has no proof it was me. has she got the right to accuse me of doing something like theft without any proof?

 

It doesn't sound to me as though you've been accused of anything!

 

I'd let it go until they actually start pursuing you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...