Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Find out here if your local court is staying claims


ICY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5419 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I did my best today to have the stay removed but it wasn't good enough - I LOST!

The Judge wasn't interested, he said he was not qualified to make the decision and it was best to leave it to the high court! He didn't even want to see my court bungle and the solicitor representing Barclays just quoted a lot of legal jargon that i did not understand. The only thing that the Judge was interested in was saying how much of his time had been taken up by Bank Charges hearings! Barclays little weasel scurried off with a smile on his face when the Judge refused to lift the stay - I think it was a case of my time being wasted not he Judges as it was a dead cert of the outcome before i even got in the room - GUTTED sad.gif

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 752
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What compound interest is that?

The courts will allow you to charge 8%p.a.

the bank owes me £3k thats less than £20 per month.

When I receive my settlement I will pay off the £3k Barclaycard bill I owe that they are able to charge about £50 interest a month on so it will cost me £1 a day in added interest until this is settled.

 

 

Bigalis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not going down this road again- if took me long enough to work it out for myself!

 

All money they have unlawfully debited is reclaimable.

 

The interest you have been scammed into paying on your unlawful charges was just as unlawfully debited as the charges, and you can claim it back using the same arguments as the charges.

 

Add charges and interest levied thereon, and that is the principal of your claim, compound interest accruing at a daily rate until settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

My claim against Barclays has been defended, with the statement below.

Does this mean that it will be stayed?

 

Thanks

 

"Defence

You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly."

Link to post
Share on other sites

tcook5

 

No it just means that it can't proceed any further with MCOL. Your case has to now be dealt with by post/phone etc...

NatWest - Rejected partial offer. Ongoing:rolleyes:

MBNA - settled in full :D

Morgan Stanley - settled in full :D

Egg - Settled in full:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Question....

i had my case stayed on 30th Aug in Kingston along with about 20 others. Is it worth me applying for a lift on the stay? i am suffering financial hardship as a result of the outcome and Barclays have continued to charge me (£430 since initial claim). Should i apply or just keep my £35 which will pay my electric bill??

Barclays hearing 30th Aug 07 - now Barclays pay Feb 09!!

Twitter - @monkeymax

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: Hi, my case was won on the 19th of July because of a lack of defense by the bank, the oft went to the high court on the 28th.

 

So my case was won 9 days before that, does anyone know how i stand legally? they tried to apply for a stay for this reason and have changed their minds to an administration error!

 

Im in court tomorrow (13/09/07)

 

Shan. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: Hi, my case was won on the 19th of July because of a lack of defense by the bank, the oft went to the high court on the 28th.

 

So my case was won 9 days before that, does anyone know how i stand legally? they tried to apply for a stay for this reason and have changed their minds to an administration error!

 

Im in court tomorrow (13/09/07)

 

Shan. :)

 

Hiya's

Sorry can't help with your problem, just wanted to wish you luck for tomorrow :D

 

Take care

Debs

xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question, hope im on the right thread?

my sons case v natwest has been stayed, they (cleveland combined court) have since sent an allocation questionnaire, do i still complete and send it to the courts within 14 days of issue? should i also include the basic court bundle at this stage?

thanks

davyboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Question....

i had my case stayed on 30th Aug in Kingston along with about 20 others. Is it worth me applying for a lift on the stay? i am suffering financial hardship as a result of the outcome and Barclays have continued to charge me (£430 since initial claim). Should i apply or just keep my £35 which will pay my electric bill??

 

Anybody?

Barclays hearing 30th Aug 07 - now Barclays pay Feb 09!!

Twitter - @monkeymax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Question....

i had my case stayed on 30th Aug in Kingston along with about 20 others. Is it worth me applying for a lift on the stay? i am suffering financial hardship as a result of the outcome and Barclays have continued to charge me (£430 since initial claim). Should i apply or just keep my £35 which will pay my electric bill??

 

definately, I would go for a lift of stay stating your financial harship and in the alternative request that Barclays stop applying charges untill the test case has been decided as it is putting you in financial hardship and advise the court that you have had a further £430 in charges. I did read somewhere that Barclays were not going to object to stays being lifted but how true that is I do not know.

 

I have also read that that the test case may not now proceed! there was an article on the BBC a couple of days ago and the OFT may announce this shortly. If you find this article in the news section I would take a print out of that article and send it in with your lift of your stay. I have just found it for you.

BBC NEWS | Business | OFT may compromise on bank fees

Let us know how you get on.

 

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes £35 without you attending and I believe it is £65 if you want to attend. I would either check on line or phone the courts for guidance. It may be easier and wiser to plead your case in person, because then you can explain to the judge how their charging regime is putting you in fincial hardship.

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...