Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I started paying her old council tax as they said they would jail her I managed to get those account details. We then got back together she moved in with me stopped me going to my house. Eventually let me back in I was there 4 days then the police showed up at 1am arrested me for 8 different offences. On the morning I was in custody she rang the letting agent and asked for the house to be changed to her sole name as I was in jail. The house was changed to her name I was made homeless. The bills she did not change to her name left them as occupier the utility companies then said I had to pay as there was lots more usage than an empty property. My solicitor said if I don't pay them I will be reported for it. It has since turned out that in her old property she didn't pay the bills. The electric bill she put in her daughter's name then cancelled the direct debit the council tax she never attempted to pay. Due to one of the accusations I have since been told I need to pay these bills even after getting emails saying I'm not liable for the bills. I have forwarded these on to the police and solicitors and had no reply. Other than you have to pay these bills. I'm also going to end up paying the bills where she lives now as once again they are not being paid. I can't go in to detail about the case as I'm due to be charged next week not sure what with yet but the police have told me I'm going to be charged.  My ex will not tell me nor can tell me about her debts as she doesn't want me to know how much debt she is in or has put her daughter in once she turned 18. I do not want to be paying her debts after what she has done to me.
    • In the earlier thread (now linked above) you were going to change your name by Deed Poll. Did you do that? Did it solve any of your problems? What, exactly, have you been charged with? Has a court date been scheduled? I cannot think of any reason why the police would tell you to pay your Ex's debts that she incurred 5 years before you met her. Either there's lots of the story you aren't telling us, or you have misunderstood what you have been told, or you are trolling us. Earlier you said it was your Ex who wanted you to pay her debts and, for some reason that  no-one here could understand, you were going to do so. So your Ex can give you all the details of her debts and you can pay them. She can hardly expect you to pay them if she won't give you the account details! I've never known debt collectors be fussy about who pays as long as someone does. They routinely take payments from friends and family to clear debts. It's not illegal to pay someone else's debts          
    • What you've said isn't helping. Please post up a redacted version of the appropriate section of the court papers.  HB
    • Oh, yeah. The law I’m charged with is riding underground without a valid ticket said by SJPN Student Union can’t provide any help, I have contacted them
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guys,

 

just looking for some advice on the following situation.

 

Have rented a property for the last 3 yrs. About a month before we moved out, we had a meeting with the landlady and the agent at the house. She had a look round and was generally very pleased, she even said she loved what we had done with the garden as it was just an overgrown mess before. We had some furniture that we would not use in our next place and she seemed very happy for it to be left in the house. the outcome of this meeting was felt to be very positive. It must be mentioned here that she was at this stage planning to let the property again.

 

We cleaned the place up to the standard we found it, i even painted the door frames where they were a bit scuffed. We were present during the infantry and even attended to any cleaning that the clerk pointed out to us.

 

I feel that as we took the time to have a meeting with the landlady and also were present during the infantry, that we made every effort to address any problems with the house.

 

But, now the landlady has decided to move in and not rent it out. She has said it took her six days of cleaning to get the house to her satisfaction. The total bill was about £500. I have written to her via the agent and explained that she had a made a few valid points, for one the cooker needed cleaning, fair enough as we had not done the inside. But the rest of the cleaning labour cost is unnaceptable. She has written back and she has accepted two days cleaning, plus some other costs. She has offered £300. I still think this is unnaceptable.

 

My case is this: she was happy with the condition when she was going to continue letting. However, now that she has decided to move in herself, the standard has increased. Thats not fair on us.

 

how would this stand in court?

 

many thanks,

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the signed inventory says the house was acceptable she doesn't have a leg to stand on.

It makes no difference whether she is moving in herself or moving another tenant in.

Ask for receipts regarding this (excessive) cleaning bill, she's pulling a fast one and just doesnt want to refund your deposit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is called "betterment", and you are not allowed to use a tenants deposit for this. Did you sign an inventory upon moving into the property?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We did sign an inventory when we moved in. But it was another housemate because it was a shared house and he has now moved out. Really, the agent should have performed an inventory each time someone moved out. There has been about 7 housemates over the yrs and now i am lumped with being the last one. So its not my signature.

 

She has provided cleaning equipment reciepts (just gloves, cleaner, cloths, etc) but the main bulk of the cleaning was done by herself and another person. So she is claiming 2 days x 2ppl x £7 per hour at 7 hours per day. She reckons it took her 6 days (unbelievable!!) but she does not think its fair on us, so has reduced it to 2.

 

I need to find that infantry, its here somewhere but we have just moved in.

Also, we were never given a dillaptidation scedule is this another point in my favour or does it not really count?

 

many thanks,

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much got her on the point that the inventory was not updated on each housemate leaving and joining. Was the tenancy a joint and several one? Or did you each let a room seperately?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...