Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Any stays applied for against Barclaycard claims due to OFT bank charge test case?


noomill060
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have taken this text from the OFT website - it states that £12 is the maximum charge!

 

"The OFT is not proposing that default fees should be equivalent to the threshold, and a court will certainly not consider that a default fee is fair just because it is below the threshold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, LS123, and it states further that ...

 

"A fair default charge should not exceed a reasonable estimate of certain limited administrative costs which the [issuer] reasonably expects to incur as a result of default."

 

Noomill, my N1 includes removal of default as does my N1 for NatWest so you and I are in the same position ... just remind me when you filed your claim please. TVM

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all very good peeps!

 

I am currently telling anyone who'll listen to start on their CCards whilst the test case is in motion - no point wasting valuable time not suing anyone!

 

These little notes are also very useful, and no doubt will come in very handy!

 

Has anyone heard anything about the prelim hearing today? If there is anything in that that leaves a hole for us to get through I'd like to explore it, and make it work for us!

 

Peter

Sign my petition to the Prime Minister here:

PETITION

Thanks

Peter

 

!!!WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

can anyone help me. I have won three Bank current account claims - one in and two out of Court.

 

I want to start a claim for charges on my credit card which I understand is a slightly different process?

 

Can anyone point me in the direction of any differences in what I actually claim - and in the paperwork - SAR, POC etc?

 

Fred

Link to post
Share on other sites

The banks defence for current accounts, is based on there being no contract, and therefore they say the charges are fees for a service.

 

But with credit cards, there certainly is a contract. We have to stick within an agreed limit, and pay a minimum amount each month by a set date.

 

If you breach this contract, you are charged. So we are on much more solid ground with regards to credit card.

 

I am sure i have a letter from a credit card, confirming that the charges were for breach of contract. I will look through my papers.

 

I filed against Barclaycard for myself and a friend on the same day. Yesterday, they defended mine, but my friend won by default.

[COLOR=#2e8b57][B][SIZE=1][U]Claimed & won so far[/U]:-[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e8b57][SIZE=1][COLOR=seagreen][U]Banks[/U]:- NatWest Personal £1000, Natwest Business £2000, Lloyds TSB Personal £1500, [U]Mortgages[/U]:-Central Capital (PPI) £500, Natwest MEAF £140 [/COLOR][COLOR=#2e8b57][U]Credit cards[/U]:- HSBC Gold card £365, Capital One £599.55 Barclaycard £1070 ( i only aske for £700) , Lloyds £500 [U]Catalogues[/U]:- Littlewoods Direct Flex Account £60 :D [/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e8b57][SIZE=1][B][U]For Friends[/U][/B]:- Natwest £1500, £1800 & £500, Cap One £600, Barclaycard £400, Solutions £100, Aqua, £105.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e8b57][B][U][SIZE=1][COLOR=seagreen]Pending:-[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/B] [COLOR=seagreen][SIZE=1]Barclays Bank Personal (On hold - Thanks a lot OFT) :mad:.[/SIZE][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this thread, I was actually about to start one to ask the same thing - if the test case would effect credit card charges claims.

 

If I gather what's been said correctly, it looks like as the OFT have already 'addressed' the level of charges on credit cards and subsequently advised that they should be no more than 12 pounds, therefore, any stays on claims against credit cards wouldn't be entertained?

 

I have 2 by the way, one is with Capital One, I am unsure of the charges amount, but the balance is about 170 over my limit, which is predominantly charges. The other is Barclaycard which is sitting at almost 3000 (!!), my limit was 2000, but the charges were incurred before I began going over my limit. I took a look at the interest charges and late payment charges and nearly fell off my seat:

 

Over Credit Limit Charge - 12.00

Interest on your standard balance - 38.98 (!!)

Interest on your cash balance - 13.61

Total - 64.59!!

 

The previous months charges totaled 73.13 (Oh MY!)

 

Barclaycard have passed my account to Mercers Debt Collections Agency, so does anyone know if when I begin my claim do I send the S.A.R. to Mercers or Barclaycard?

 

Also, Capital One passed my account to a debt collections agency too and then I received a letter from them saying it had been passed back to Capital One and if I didnt pay up it would be sent to another debt collections agency, whats that all about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My account is also now with Mercers - I sent my SAR to Barclaycard and eventually got all my statements.

 

Take a look at my thread to see where I am going with this.

 

Anyone seen the BBC website this morning?! I am not allowed to post the link, but this has ****ed me off

Pre-tax profit at the bank rose 12% to £4.1bn

 

Go get 'em guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

aqualibrium- Mercers ARE Barclays! ;)

 

Just start your claim and serve it on Barclays Bank PLC t/a Barclaycard, when you know what all your charges are and how much interest youve been decieved into paying.

 

If you are being hassled by Mercers- send a CCA s.78 request, this will put the account into dispute, shut the bar stewards up and give you time to evaluate your charges situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Moneyhelp,

 

I will pour over it, as I may be going down a different route from before here, depending on the amount of the charges. (With my Nationwide claim, I went down the FOS route, due to the amount of the claim being over the Summary Cause limit for Scotland)

 

Thanks Noomill060,

 

I like the sound of that CCA s.78 request, considering I have had to unplug my phone over the last couple of weeks to get peace! Even though all my creditors have been informed I am seeking debt advice and any offer of payment will depend on a thorough assessment of my financial position.

 

I don't suppose anyone could point me in the right direction to get info on this CCA s.78 request please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this-

 

Your address

 

Their address

 

date

 

Section 78 request Account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/ Madam,

 

Under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 you are ordered to supply me with the following:

 

1)A True copy of the excecuted agreement conforming to the prescribed format under the Act.

 

2)Any deed of assignment

 

3)A statement of the current balance you claim is owed under the credit agreement

 

I enclose the maximum statutory fee of £1 (Postal Order no. xxxxxxxxxxxxx) I retain the receipt for this and the reciept for this letter sent by Recorded Delivery (tracking number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

aqualibrium

 

Send a PO rather than a cheque- its verifiably traceable by the Post Office and they cant deny recieving this notice if you send it by Recorded. Keeping the reciept means you can prove they recieved it by using the Track and Trace facility at www.royalmail.com

 

They have 12 working days to supply you, after which time they have deemed to have made it unenforcable (until they do) and if they fail to do so after 30 they commit an offence.

 

 

Start a thread of your own so we know where you are, and keep us informed what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot Noomill.

 

I would just like to double-check something, am I right in saying that the purpose of the above letter is to put my account in dispute and that I send this along with my S.A.R.?

 

I will start a thread now. (here we go again :eek:)

 

Thank you for all your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the purpose of the s.78 request is to force them to provide evidence that you owe them anything- until they do they cant hassle you or enforce whatever agreement they may have.

 

But, yes, it has a secondary effect of putting the account into dispute UNTIL they comply.

 

The SAR is a request for all the data they hold on you, including all the charges and interest charged on the charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been asked already !

 

I'm in court with Barclaycard on the 25th of Oct , and been asked to fax over my defense to their Legal Section , (what do I send ) also I have downloaded the basic court bundle of here but been told I have to put some details of mine on there , how do I do this ?

 

Any help would be great !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband has a court hearing in September against Barclaycard. We have followed the reclaiming process all the way to exchange of bundles. A letter came through yesterday from the bank informing us of their intention to ask the Courts for a stay of the claim. Are they trying to scare us off and if so, does anyone have any ideas on what response we should make?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a letter from my local court which states:

 

Upon reading the court file

 

And upon the court noting that a test case has been issued in the High Court between the Office of Fair Trading and certain banks, with a view to determining issues of legal principle in relation to the recovery of charges made on bank current accounts.

 

And it appearing that the issues raised in the test case are similar to those in this claim.

 

THE COURT OF ITS OWN INITIATIVE ORDERS THAT:

 

1. This claim is stayed until 31st March 2008 with a view to awaiting the decision in test case. Either party may apply at any time, by application on notice in accordance with CPR 23, to lift the stay.

 

2. If no such application is made, the court will give directions of its own initiative on the expiry of the stay.

 

3. The allocation hearing listed on (date) be vacated.

 

 

 

Can someone please tell me what I should do now? I thought the stay was only applied in the case of current accounts. Who should I speak to?

Would appreciate any advice PLEASE !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There now seems to be a pattern forming here.

 

Shazza- I would recommend that you make a photocopy of this letter from barclaycard and send it, together with a letter to the FSA complaining about Barclaycard's abuse of the waiver, which ONLY applies to current account claims not credit cards.

 

lesley jane- you need to apply to have the stay removed for the same reason. Judges seem to be confusing credit card claims with claims for the return of unlawful penalty charges applied to current accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be interesting to know if any of those having stays applied have also been going for a removal of defaults?

 

I can't see how a judge can blur the two issues as the gap between them widens?

 

Would be good to know.

 

Cheers

 

Peter

Sign my petition to the Prime Minister here:

PETITION

Thanks

Peter

 

!!!WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...