Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me V Barclays


Scubadoo1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all - need some help

 

I have got the defence letter from court re Barclays with usual stuff.

 

The letter states

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

The filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispenced with in this case unless the Distrect Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise.

 

court will be Hitchin

 

What does this mean?

 

Sorry to be so dumb!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi scubadoo.

 

Welcome to the site. I would suggest that you have a read through the FAQ's. It would be extemely helpful if you could post up a brief history of your claim and the process that you have followed. An AQ is the form that you fill in that will decide which track the case will take, small claims/ fast/multi. You have claimed via MCOL so the AQ process will not be needed unless the judge at your court orders you to fill one in. However you may still need to pay the AQ fee. Look through as many threads on here as you can and get familiar with the process. This is basically a self help site but we are there when you come across problems.

 

Good Luck

 

Trucker

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scuba and welcome to CAG! :)

 

This means that you filed online MCOL and now that Barclays are Defending the case, it has been moved to your local county court. This is normal.

 

At this point, it's saying you don't have to fill in an Allocations Questionnaire (the form that helps coourt decide which way to proceed with case) BUT that your local court judge may decide when he looks at the claim, that he does want one filled in.

 

Just wait for the next letter from the court - it will either

a) Give you a hearing date (normally a Directions);

b) be a Notice asking you to submit more information;

c) be a Notice asking you to fill in a AQ (the form will be sent with Notice)

 

I recommend you read through http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

 

Have you followed all the steps up to now from this site or have you followed guidance from somewhere else?

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means you don't have to file an AQ. Wait for the court to send you directions.

In Hitchin's case it will be this:

 

Before District Judge Field sitting at Hitchin County Court:

It is ordered that;

The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attempt to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by setting out a concise statement of the facts. (stylised particulars do not constitute compliance). The claimant must amend or substitute the particulars of claim by setting out the case and by including details of the charges complained of, how they are calculated and in what circumstances they were incurred.

 

The claimant should note that sending copy correspondence and/or copies of bank statements will not suffice.

 

The claimant has until 4pm XX/XX2007 to comply with this order. In default the claim will be struck out without further notice."

 

This is because Judge Field never accepts particulars of claim filed at MCOL.

 

You will have to send a fuller POC. See here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/71394-abbey-national-me-defence.html#post661174

 

which includes the following

 

Details of The Charges Complained of:

 

The type of charge, the amount and date of each charge are listed in the schedule of charges attached

 

How The Charges are Calculated:

 

The charges have been debited in accordance with the Defendants Terms & Conditions

 

The Circumstances in which the Charges were incurred are as follows:

 

Unauthorised O/D Fees

This is when you have an overdraft or not and you go over that. The bank charges through charging periods which last a month and the charge goes out at the end of the month.

 

Unpaids Out

This appears on the statement and is when there is not sufficient funds in the account the previous working day(mon to Friday) to cover either a cheque, a direct debit or standing order to cover the amount going out. The bank "bounces" or does not pay the item and you get charged for it.

 

Paid Referral Fees

This is when an item is, rather than bounced is paid which takes the account over an agreed or unagreed overdraft

 

and enclose a detailed schedule of charges. Use the Simple S/S here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

See here for a visual guide:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bcard-woolwich-successes/7226-maisielou-barclays.html#post50088

 

When entering your charges, don’t delete anything first. Just overwrite the existing examples: type of charge, amount and date.

 

The ‘Days Since’ and ‘8% Interest’ columns will be calculated automatically

 

Save it and print out as your schedule of charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

I started the process off myself, as I am claiming for our Buisness account for the last 5 years.

 

I took all the charges off the bank statements and hidden in our commission charges, did a spreadsheet, worked out 8% interest and sent it off to Barclays asking for our mony back. (This was from a template I found on the web but is very similar to this forums one).

 

Barclays offered half

 

We said no and asked them to send the mony or we would go to court and to give us a full responce within 7 days

 

Got no reply so phoned Barclays who said thay had not received the letter

so I faxed it and got confirmation that they had received it

 

No respose for 3 weeks

 

Filled in online claim with words similar to what you guys recommend.

 

22 days passed looking good, then day 23 Acknoladgement!!!

 

Again 13 days passed looking good, then day 14 Defence!!!

 

No court date yet just a transfer to Hitchin court and getting a bit scared......

 

 

Claimingfor £3,000+

 

Looking forward to your help

 

Sorry for typo's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scubadoo

 

You have come to the right place. Could you post up the first 3 points of Barclays defence. Just want to chaeck that you are not being asked for anything.

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trucker

 

Defence

1. The particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question and / or the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. To the extent it is alledged thet the Claimant incurred bank charges on the claimants account for unauthorised borrowings (whether unpaid fees for returned cheques, "paid referral fees" or other such fees), the defendant puts the claiment to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

2. The particulars of claim are summary in nature. Accordingly, this defence is summary in nature and the defendant reserves the right to amend this statement of case in due course.

3. The defendant is entitled to charge the claimant for unauthorised borrowings by reason of its standard terms and conditions. The claimant accepted the same when the account was opened, including (in particular but without limitation) the following terms and conditions (which are summarised):

a. The defendants right to charge a paid refferal fee where the defendant pays an amount (either by compultion or election) which causes the accout to become overdrawn - £30 per item (previously £25)

b. The defendants right to charge an administration feeif any cheque standing order or direct debit cannot be paid because of insufficent cleared funds in the account - (£35 per item previously £30)

c. The defendants entitlement, if the claimany becomes overdrawn without an overdraft limit, to charge interest at the unauthorised borrowing rate on the excess balance.

4. The defendats standard terms and conditions give the claimant a fair and transparent view ETC.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scubadoo

 

You need to send both the court and Barclay's an upto date Schedule of Charges. If you sent 1 before you filed at court this will not have been passed onto Barclays litigation team.

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have done the schedule and the longer version of the POC paid hitchin £100 on time, sent in the POC on time and copied the lot to Barclays.

 

This was all done before the 7 Aug and I have heard nothing more.

 

In light of the OFT what should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...