Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC/Weightmans - old Marbles card debt - Statutory Demand withdrawn now claimform


bennieee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5853 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

there are a lot of people that have stat demends served without going to court in order to scare them into paying. This is an abuse of process and ammounts to harrassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just checked and it doesn't have to be stamped by the court ...its just the first step in trying to make you bankrupt and a copy of it with an affadavit has to be attached to the subsequent bankruptcy petition.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, I would tend towards believing this to be a scare tactic and not a genuine demand.

 

That is purely my opinion though, I have ridden out 3 SDs up to now but any decision as to what you do next must be carefully weighed up.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Protection Act disclosure request

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: ****************

 

Please supply me with All my personal data you hold including a complete list of transactions and charges (or alternatively a set of statements) relating to my account history with your organisation. I also require a complete breakdown of each Late Payment fee and Over Limit fee charged to this account, or any similar related charges. The complete breakdown of each charge must contain the following:

 

Hourly rate of each member of staff involved with each administration of the fees / charges. The time each member of staff spent on the administration of the fees/charges. Details of the work carried out and completed by each member of staff involved with each administration of the fees/charges. Total cost of the paper, envelopes, ink, and postage of each automated and manually written letter relevant to the issuing of the fees/charges, and any other costs incurred in each fee/charge including other employee’s involvement, their hourly rate, time spent on the involvement, and what their involvement consisted of.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you. If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

Furthermore please provide me with a copy of my contracts with you, and a copy of my original terms and conditions. I make this request under the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998, and including the right of subject access under these acts.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78, I am entitled to receive a copy of any credit agreement and a statement of account on request . I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I understand a copy of any credit agreement along with a statement of account should be supplied within 12 working days.

However given the time restraints now in place due to the issuing by yourselves of the formal statutory demand, the fact that the information should be readily available within your case file and that we are now working under CPR rules I request the information be furnished by return.

 

I further understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with the request for a copy of the agreement and statement of account under these sections of the Act.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Please note that the Postal orders I have supplied are NOT to be applied to any alleged debt but used only for purposes supplied.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Mr .***************

Enc £1.00 Postal Order ********

£10.00 Postal Order **********

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

A statutory demand requires that the debtor either:

  • Pays the relevant amount


  • Offers to secure it against property


  • Offers to repay the debt in a way that is satisfactory to the creditor. For example, by instalments.


Some creditors use statutory demands as a way of persuading debtors to pay off the debt, usually by borrowing elsewhere.

 

However, statutory demands should be taken seriously. After 21 days the creditor can petition for a bankruptcy order. Therefore, it is usually worth contacting the creditor by telephone and asking them what their next step will be.

 

Ignoring a statutory demand may encourage the creditor to petition for bankruptcy. It is worth bearing this in mind, particularly if the debtor is contemplating petitioning for his own bankruptcy.

 

If the debtor wants to avoid bankruptcy he should consider:

  • Making payment(s) to reduce the debt to less than £750; or


  • Making an offer to pay by instalments; or


  • Making an offer of a reduced amount in settlement of the debt; or


  • Applying to have the statutory demand set aside


Setting aside a statutory demand.

21 days after the serving of the statutory demand, the creditor can petition for the debtor’s bankruptcy unless it has been ‘set aside’.

An application to set aside the statutory demand can be made if:

  • There is a substantial dispute about the money owed;


  • There is a counterclaim of more than the money owed;


  • The creditor holds security that equals or exceeds the debt in value;


  • On ‘Other Grounds’. Though not defined, these can include:


    • The demand was issued in error, e.g. for a secured debt or for an amount of less than £750;


    • Execution has been stayed on a judgement;


    • The debtor is complying with an instalment order (so the debt is not strictly due); and


    • The creditor failed to comply with the rules and prejudiced the debtor in the process;


An application to set aside must be made with 18 days of the statutory demand being served. Forms 6.4 (application) and 6.5 (affidavit) must be completed and taken to the court. However, the court can dismiss the application if there are no grounds.

 

If there are grounds, a hearing will be arranged at which the court will decide whether the demand will be set aside.

 

If the debt falls under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the court should also consider if any relief is available to the debtor under the Act. This would include a time order application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the next step will be to apply for a set aside in that the amount of the debt is disputed. Lets see if you get a response to the CCa request by next Weds/Thursday. If you don't it can be added to the set aside application that you have not had sight of a true executed copy etc .

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so I should send the first letter to the DCA and the second one to HFC?

 

If the demand is from the court, they would have a record of it, is it worth calling them to see?

 

and looking around the forums, i see alot that people add - phrases such as 'I do not acknowledge any debt to your company' and 'without predjudice' should i add these in to the letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't add Without Prejudice as you want to produce this correspondence into court.!!

 

You can at top of letter put the following

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

but its not strictly necessary (may make you feel better though!) because your agreement is pre CCA 2006 so if they can't produce an agreement or one thats properly executed then according to the House of Lords ruling in Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and industry they can't use ordinary contract law to enforce it.

 

I'm about to go intop a series of meetings now so I'll catch up later with you

 

Don't forget to send letters Special Delivery...........

 

Tryt not to worry you're amongst the Caggers family here:)

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for all the help :-)

 

to update... I posted both of these on Friday, Weightmans signed for it today and the HFC one is out for delivery today. Just have to wait now. I am speaking with the CCCS this morning as I booked an appt last week so will report back after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok keep us up to date after seeing the CCCs

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

An SD does not have a court stamp on it. The courts are not involved with the service of a SD they only become involved if an application to have it set aside is made when they set a hearing date for the set aside to be heard

 

Correct i was wrong earlier in this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing received from HFC as yet but I did recieve a letter from Weightmans this morning...

 

'We refer to your recent correspondance. As requested we enclose a copy of your orginal credit agreement.

 

As you have now been served with a Statutory demand, we request that you contact us to agree a suitable payment agreement and/or security for this debt, or we reserve the right to issue a bankruptcy petition against you.

 

If we do not hear from you within 21 days from the date that you were served with the statutory demand, we will have no alternative but to continue with legal proceedings immediately.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.'

 

There was a copy of an application form enclosed that is signed by both them and me but there are no t and c attached, is this a proper CCA?

 

I only now have 6 days until the 21 days is up so a little bit worried, I know that part of the debt is made up of charges but am not sure how much.

 

I spoke to the CCCS this week and they have agreed a DMP for both me and my partner. They did also agree during the discussion that it was worth sending a CCA request to the other creditors along with a SAR to try and reclaim other charges so this is something that I am going to get on with at the weekend. I would really appreciate advice on the CCA that they have sent to me and also advice on what to do next.

 

I have blanked out ref number from the solicitors, my name and address, my oh's name and signature and my signature

 

application form.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an application form. There are no Terms and conditions with it so I dont think its acceptable or enfoceable. I suugeest you PM some of the site helpers who will give you a definative answer. Anyway you need to return the SD saying the amount is in dispute. You need the SAR from HFC to see what illegal charges they have imposed

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur, heading states quite clearly "Application"

Not too clear but I do not see any APR details etc either, another point in your favour.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an application form only. There are none of the prescribed terms. It is unenforceable by the court.

 

You must on monday file an application to set aside the statutory demand using a form N244 (£65.00 court fee) and say that this debt is not acknowledged and does not exist. I'll draft the application for you.

 

Don't worry the statutory notice will definitely be set aside.

 

and we'll ask for them to pay the costs of the set aside. We will also ask the court to declare that the agreement is unenforceable and then they can go swing for their money.................:p

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing to worry about now they've supplied the CCA. You have 18 days to apply for set aside from service on you on the 10th July, 2007 = 28th July

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you :)

 

I am going to submit the form today to the court, would it be possible to have some idea of what to put as the reason to have it set aside, I have read loads of the forums on here which are brilliant but can't find anything similar to use as basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to Claimants Solicitors

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated............. and the copy of the agreement provided by you in response to my S.78 CCA request. The agreement you have supplied does not conform to the Agreement Regulations s.60(1) on several counts, is therefore improperly executed as per s.61(1), and as a consequence is irredeemably un-enforceableunder s.127(3).

I have today made an application to dismiss the statutory demand and will be seeking to recover costs incurred in this matter.

I will also be asking the court for a declaration that the contract was void ab-initio and if successful will be reclaiming all monies paid to your clients.

Looking forward to your early response

Yours Faithfully,

*************************************************************

 

 

 

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...