Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did call the police both in the UK and in my country but both of them said no way to get the money back now. I tried my best not panic but it indeed influenced my life in many ways, the only thing I could do is start therapies. It happened around February- March, so I started to do this shoplifting thing to cover my rent and everything from the end of March, it’s been a month now… today it my first time to get caught. I know it’s very very bad, I seriously didn’t want to do this at all. But luckily I just saw an message from HR, they asked me to have an online interview next week. I’ll stop this behaviour and wish my messed up life back to normal soon 
    • did you contact your bank about the fraud? contact the police , action fraud anyone in authority? have you done anything about it? when did it happen? dx  
    • You may have noticed that we have gone to the trouble of restructuring your posts to make them readable. I had to do it twice now.  My site team colleague has done it once. Posting long blocks of text make it very difficult for people to read especially using telephones. It discourages people who might want to help you. Please can you make your posts properly spaced and punctuated. Thank you
    • Thank you, I was been told that it’s a serious crime if I shoplifted above £200, (this time £500, I gave the thing back+ last time probably also around £500 which I didn’t give back).. and I admitted to them that I sold those things at very low price to pay for food and stuff.   That’s why I was worried..as it wasn’t my first time.. I also did it in John Lewis in the city I live, but when they asked me I said I didn’t steal things from it as I don’t wanna get caught in my city. But I don’t know when they upload my pics in the system will they recognise me and think of me a professional shoplifter than against me… so what happened about the fraud was that what there was a phone call told me that my visa has problems etc due to I helped bad people do money laundering etc. I said I didn’t then they tried to ‘control’ me and many things happened to make me believe what they said… as soon as I gave them the bank details I lost all the money in it. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cant Defend Cca?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI all,

 

can anyone advise on if you cant win on the cca argument what happens when creditor takes you to court gets ccj against you with regard to costs and interest being added i will be there soon as it looks ike they have me nailed to the floor:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the CCA is correct then there isn't really a defence.

You'd be better off trying to come to an arrangement with the OC, rather than let it get to court.

 

If on the other hand the CCA is incorrectly excuted then it is totally defendable.

 

Have a look at this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/90012-just-been-court-cl.html

covers a lot of stuff, but basically if all they have supplied for your CCA is an application form then there's a rock solid defence.

 

Good Luck.

  • Haha 1

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi OutOfCash,

 

You've read my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/97654-reply-cca-request-help.html and our circumstances are the same :wink:

 

From what I understand, our CCA documents are unenforcable as they have not been signed by the creditor.

 

However, HAD they been signed by the creditor (and I see no reason why, if asked to present the signed agreement in court, the creditor couldn't 'add' their signature), then it appears that they WOULD be enforcable.

 

Even though the majority of posters here appear to think that an 'application' form is not acceptable as an 'agreement', and we signed the 'application' form.

 

So I'm still not sure what to do, but I guess I'll make them an offer of repayment and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi so fed up,

 

if they added their sig just before court they would not look good to a judge under the disclosures rules an application form is just that its pre contractual application for credit .and a cca request is air tight in this case banks and visa companys have lost cases on this have a look around on the forum i think there are some but not many i have been threatened with court 3 times this year jan onwards still waiting for them to do it?

 

 

have a read of this

The DTI press release is copied below.

Thursday 9 December 2004 13:28

Department of Trade and Industry (National)

INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR ON LINE CREDIT AGREEMENTS

 

Consumers will be able to agree credit agreements online from 31 December, Consumer Minister Gerry Sutcliffe announced today. Currently, consumers can apply for credit on line, but before the contract is complete the customer must sign a hard copy of the agreement. From the end of this month consumers will be able to complete the transaction electronically. Lenders will still have to send hard copy letters when any charges for missed payments are imposed or the agreement is cancelled. Gerry Sutcliffe said: "We are undertaking the biggest shake-up of the consumer credit market for 30 years, making it relevant for today's market. "Enabling consumers to complete credit agreements from the comfort of their own homes is a key part of this modernisation process. "This new rule will improve consumer choice without removing any consumer protection, and save business time and resources." Consumers who enter into credit agreements online will have a 14-day 'cooling off' period when they can cancel the agreement. This gives consumers extra time to shop around for the best deals and seek financial advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI all,

 

can anyone advise on if you cant win on the cca argument what happens when creditor takes you to court gets ccj against you with regard to costs and interest being added i will be there soon as it looks ike they have me nailed to the floor:eek:

 

If you get taken to court and lose, a couple of hundred pounds are added to your debt, and the judge will probably set up an installment plan to pay the debt back.

 

At worst, you might eventually get a charging order added to your property, or an attachment of earnings if you work. But the installment order would be for no more than the you could aford, after taking into account all reasonable living expenses.

 

If they intended to charge interest after judgment, they would have to send you notice of this, and you could apply for a time order and ask that the court review this interest.

 

also, don't believe everything the claimant says... Lots of people win on these grounds. Get a copy of the credit agreement, and post it.

 

 

 

In other words, it's not the end of the world.

 

However, you are making big assumptions here. Have you obtained a copy of the credit agreement? Does it have all the prescribed terms? Have you posted it? Did they charge penalty charges, and if so is any notice of assignment valid? Have they sent you a proper default notice?

 

There are LOTS of ways to win in court; an improperly executed Credit Agreement is only the first of them.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are the same :wink:

 

From what I understand, our CCA documents are unenforcable as they have not been signed by the creditor.

 

Hi there,

 

It could still be enforceable with the leave of the court.

 

had it not been signed by yourself it would have been totally enforceable.

 

I hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As requested, I uploaded them for you.

 

They look enforceable to me (No creditor sig) - except that the reference no seems different on one of the pages of the credit agreements compared to the other.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it's a 2005 agreement does it require default information?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore my last comment.

 

This may be a red herring as the agreement looks fine, but why does the last page say page 3 of 3?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...