Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
    • Here is my final draft: I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act.   1.        The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date.   2.        I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment.   As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3.        The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’.  The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents.   4.        Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018.   5.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020.   6.        Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicotors is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’   7.        I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’.   8.        The claimant relies upon and exhibits a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement.   It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HH Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’.   The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause.   9.        Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not try to mislead the court.   10.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dca Replied To Cca Request Re: Default (advice Needed)


kevinmcuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had sent a CCA s77/s78 request using the standard template; and two days later one company called HILLESDEN SECURITIES had replied as follows:

 

Dear KevinMcuk

 

ACCOUNT NO XXXXXXXX - FORMERLY MBNA XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated 20th june 2007 regarding the above account. This has been passed to me for attention.

 

I would confirm and advise the following:-

 

1. I acknowledge receipt of your payment of £1.00 in connection with your data request under Consumer Credit Act 1974. We are still awaiting a copy of your original agreement with MBNA and a copy of the original default notice. When these become available they will be forwarded to you.

 

2. If we are unable to forward a copy of the original agreement, we will be able to supply a true copy of the document which will comply with section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

3. Please find enlcosed a copy of the key pages of the sale agreement between Hillesden Securities and MBNA. Please note that due to data protection we are unable to provide a full copy of the agreement, however, we would be happy to supply a full copy to a judge in court when required.

 

Should you require anything further at this point please contact me accordingly. I will update you on developments in 21 days if there are no developments beforehand.

 

Yours sincerely

 

XXXX

Director & Data Controller

Direct Line xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I am very concerned about this letter as they have stated that they may not be able to supply the orginal agreement; therefore am I legally right to refuse a copy of a copy anf demand an orginal copy? secondly, the alleged agreement to which they had supplied looks rather strange, on the bottom left of the document there is a reference number like those shown on a computer, it reads: (Hillesden Card 2002.doc) and the agreement is computer typed apart from the day within the date section which has been hand written as 24 therefore showing 24 day of October 2001, however throughout the rest of the document, there is a reference number on the bottom left showing (C:\TEMP\Hillesden Card 2002.doc) therefore I would I be right in legally challenging the actual contents of this agreement, and challenge the fact that this is not an original copy, but rather some computer print out?

 

Please advise, this is the first reply from 5 different creditors I have written to.

 

Kevin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they are trying to say is that although they don't have your original CCA, they will be able to send you a copy of what it would look like (and hope that you will fall for it and pay up).

 

The trouble is, it's the original that they would need to have re-enforced in court.... so bad luck for them and good news for you. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx, I thought as much; however if they send me a photocopy of a photocopy of a CCA agreement with a signiture on it; would that be accepted in court as proof of such contract or would they still have to supply the original signed copy? just curious?

 

Kevin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now prepairing my second letter to reply to all those creditors who have failed to respond; what do you think of this?

 

CREDITOR/DCA

XX

 

 

XX June 2007

 

Recorded Delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: XXXXXXXXX

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company.

 

I wrote to you on XX June 2007 after obtaining copies of my credit file from Equifax, Experian and Call Credit, as I was concerned to notice that your company had placed a “Default” notice against an alleged account in my name. I had mentioned that I had no recollection of ever receiving such a notice, and I was unaware of such account. I stated that I did not acknowledge this debt and I asked you to substantiate the data at your earliest convenience, mentioning that I had also raised this matter as a dispute directly with the credit reference agencies. I am aware that you had received my letter to your offices on XX June 2007 by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery.

 

I had formally requested that you supply me with an original, true-signed copy of a credit agreement that exists in relation to the alleged debt that your company has registered against my name and address; furthermore, I had also requested a statement of account; including a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice; and a deed of assignment if the alleged debt was sold on. These requests were made under my rights within Sections 77 and 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on payment of the statutory fee of £1.00 that was enclosed within the letter in the form of a cheque made payable to yourselves.

 

Under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested document. Should they fail to do this, they have a further calendar month to rectify this default. Failure to comply within these timescales is a criminal offence.

 

I would therefore consider this alleged debt as unenforceable and unsubstantiated. I would like you to update your records and inform the credit reference agencies to remove the default and adverse data that you have placed on my credit file as unsubstantiated.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

KEVINMCUK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kevin, you're not going to get any joy with that letter I'm afraid. You need to wait until the calender month is up and they have committed the summary criminal offence before getting in touch.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so is that 12 working days after the first letter; and then 30 calendar days added on top?

 

for example, I sent the letter on 20/06/2007 and they received it on 22/06/2007, when shall I send the next letter? and also would this letter be alright for the reply?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: Account Number:

 

I refer to my letters dated XX June 2007, which were delivered via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery to your offices on XX June 2007

 

You have failed to acknowledge my requests in any way, whether by confirmation of receipt of the letter or by supplying the requested documents. The documents I requested should be readily available as proof of this alleged account/debt.

 

In my letter dated XX June 2007 I made a formal request for a true and original copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account/debt under Section 77(1) and Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and a true signed copy of the Deed of Assignment. In addition a full statement of that account/debt should have been sent to me detailing all relevant and justifiable financial information; along with any other documents mentioned within the credit agreement.

 

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enters into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, your company commits an offence. These time limits expired on XX July 2007 and XX August 2007 respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware, Section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) -

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore on XX July 2007 this account/debt became unenforceable at law, as you have failed to comply with a request for a true signed copy of the said agreement, and other relevant documents mentioned in it, and failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide a true copy of the Deed of Assignment, under the relevant sections of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Furthermore, I do not acknowledge the debt.

 

I require the following action from your company:

 

1. Removal of all defaults entered by yourselves or third parties acting on your behalf in respect to this account/debt. Note this is to be a complete deletion and not merely an amendment.

 

2. I look forward to compensation under Section 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to be offered for the processing of my data in the manner it has been done over the past number of years.

 

3. You are required under Section 10 and Section 12 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to cease and desist all manual and automatic processing of my data within your company and any other company within your group.

 

If you do not respond positively to my request, court action may be taken under Section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to force your company or any other company within the group to comply with the removal of all defaults maintained and compensation for damage and distress as a result of unlawful data processing. I may also pass the matter to the relevant enforcement authorities including, but not limited to, the OFT, the Information Commissioners Office, Trading Standards, the CSA, the FOS and my local MP.

 

I look forward to your reply within 14 days to resolve the matter amicably.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...