Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning guys As Bank suggested, I've now re-worked my POC to include details of my parcel's original loss,  miraculous rediscovery a month later and subsequent delivery, albeit having been opened and the contents removed. Grateful for your thoughts please, as (P2G having gone very quiet) I intend to initiate court proceedings against P2G tomorrow - 1 May. Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing 8 second-hand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and whilst Evri collected the parcel for delivery on 18 March 24 they then ‘misplaced’ it a day later, formally declaring it lost on 27 March. On 16 April they found it and delivered it on 17 April but, at some point before delivery, it had been opened and the contents removed . The defendant refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is also in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80  
    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ony vs MBNA (Continued)


ony
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just recieved:

 

You are in breach of the agreed terms adn conditions and due to the level of arrears a decision has been made today to place a restriction on this account............

 

 

Not to perturbed about this but would love some advice on forcing compliance...anyone?

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received:

 

I regret to read you are unhappy with the adminstration of your accoun. I would like to address the points raised in your letter:

 

 

1. Please find enclsed with this letter a copy of your original credit agreement and a full statement of account (there was no agreement or statement of account)

 

If a lender did fail to comply wityh S.78, that lender may be prevented from taking certain steps to enforce a credti agreement (until such time as S.78 was satisfied)-but the underlyuing credit agreement itself, togethr with the borrowers obligation to repay remain valid and intact. For the avoidance of any doubt, we would like to confrim that MBNA has responded in full to te request made under S.78 and in any event your credit agreement remains valid adn your boligation to repay remains intact. As such , the arrears on your account are still owing and due and until this sum is repaid your account wll continue to register negative information at the credit reference agencies.

 

2. We do not provide copies of the executred deed of assignment as this is business sensitive information

 

3. We have utilised the services of the collection agents GVI in the recovery of the outstanding amounts. This action was taken simply beacuse we work......

 

4....

 

5. In reference to your point of your account in dispute, I would like to draw your attention to the contract you sgined when you took out the credit card. Section 8d states that 'Unless you have a legal right to do so, you must not hold back payment or refuse to pay anything you owe us beacuse of a dispute between you. Currently your account is three payments in arrears totallyinh £957.13 and payment is due immediately.

 

 

...I am alos enclosing a cpy of our commitments to you (This was the only thing in the envelope!!)leaflet....which explains... If I do not hear from you in 8 weeks of the date of this letter we will assume that the matter is closed.

 

comments/advice please.

 

I have the POC for non-compliance and will start proceedings.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My intended response, to be sent after proceedings iniated.

 

______

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated the 18th July 2007 in which you state you have my original credit agreement. The only documentation in your letter was an ‘Our Commitment to You’ pamphlet.

 

Therefore be advised due to MBNA’s continued failure n their obligation to provide a true copy of the original credit agreement for this alleged account and as per my earlier letters I have now initiated proceedings against MBNA for non compliance of said request under S.78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1994.

 

You, MBNA have not supplied my agreement for this alleged account and as such I am under no obligation to pay MBNA as in law no contract exists between us. For this reason I put you on notice that I have filed a claim in the county court for non compliance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 citing your failure to satisfy my request for my alleged credit agreement under Section 77 (1) and Section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. At the same time I have asked the court to make a declaration that the alleged agreement between us is void. Further I have asked the judge to order the return of monies paid on this account in the form of charges and interest paid and compensation for the continued inconvenience and harassment I have experienced from your actions in dealing with this matter.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditto :D

 

Ill be filing this week, £250 jus to file :eek:

 

hey wednesday,

 

I was over here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/104386-mbna-no-cca-gimme-6.html#post1044538 and youve been posting there so just wondering what are claiming for;

 

a) all interest paid over lifetime of account or over the past six years,

b) interest on charges over lifetime of account or over 6 years.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received:

 

I regret to read you are unhappy with the adminstration of your accoun. I would like to address the points raised in your letter:

 

 

1. Please find enclsed with this letter a copy of your original credit agreement and a full statement of account (there was no agreement or statement of account)

 

If a lender did fail to comply wityh S.78, that lender may be prevented from taking certain steps to enforce a credti agreement (until such time as S.78 was satisfied)-but the underlyuing credit agreement itself, togethr with the borrowers obligation to repay remain valid and intact. For the avoidance of any doubt, we would like to confrim that MBNA has responded in full to te request made under S.78 and in any event your credit agreement remains valid adn your boligation to repay remains intact.Why? this advice is not only wrong it is also unlawful to claim they have legal rights which they don't As such , the arrears on your account are still owing and due and until this sum is repaid your account wll continue to register negative information at the credit reference agencies.

 

2. We do not provide copies of the executred deed of assignment as this is business sensitive information

 

3. We have utilised the services of the collection agents GVI in the recovery of the outstanding amounts. This action was taken simply beacuse we work......

 

4....

 

5. In reference to your point of your account in dispute, I would like to draw your attention to the contract you sgined when you took out the credit card. Section 8d states that 'Unless you have a legal right to do so, you must not hold back payment or refuse to pay anything you owe us beacuse of a dispute between you. Currently your account is three payments in arrears totallyinh £957.13 and payment is due immediately.

 

 

...I am alos enclosing a cpy of our commitments to you (This was the only thing in the envelope!!)leaflet....which explains... If I do not hear from you in 8 weeks of the date of this letter we will assume that the matter is closed.

 

comments/advice please.

 

I have the POC for non-compliance and will start proceedings.

 

 

See my comments above. Include it in your POC & report them to the OFT as it is a breach of the guidelines

Link to post
Share on other sites

My intended POC; comments please.

 

+++++

 

On 18th May 2007 the claimant requested a true copy of the original executed credit agreement from the defendant under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended). The defendant has failed to supply any agreement. The defendant had also failed to provide a copy of the original terms and conditions which were applicable at the time.

 

2 The Claimant contends that:

 

(a) The Defendant has failed to comply with a request made under s.78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended) since dd/yyyy to provide a true copy of the executed agreement which has all the prescribed and required terms.

 

(b) The Defendant has failed to produce any agreement that complies with The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Act 1983 (as amended)

 

© Under s.78 (6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, if the Defendant cannot supply this information within the prescribed time they may not enforce the agreement and if the default continues for one month further, they commit an offence.

 

(d) The Defendant has continued, while in default and the account in dispute to add interest.

 

(e) The defendant is still enforcing the agreement and passing data onto credit reference agencies.

 

(f) The Defendant has continued to harass the claimant with repeated phone calls and messages on the claimants phone.

 

(g) The Defendant has with clear intention sought to misrepresent the law pertaining to S.78 of the Consumer Credit Act. To wit in their letter of 18th July 2007 they state “If a lender did fail to comply with S.78, that the lender may be prevented from taking certain steps to enforce a credit agreement (until such time as S.78 was satisfied)- but the underlying credit agreement itself, together with the borrower’s obligation to repay, remain valid and intact.

 

(h) The Defendant has unlawfully refused the claimants request for an executed deed of assignment contrary to S.78 of the Consumer Credit act 1997 claiming that ‘they do not provide copies of deed of assignment as this is business sensitive information’ contrary to their legal requirement to do so.

 

(i) The Defendant in their letter of 18th July continues to harass the claimant for payment despite the account clearly being in dispute through their inability to provide both a properly executed credit agreement and terms and conditions applicable at the time. However the Defendant cites from documentation they have unlawfully refused to supply the claimant stating ‘In reference to your point that your account is in dispute, I would like to draw your attention to the contract you signed when you took out the credit card. Section 8d states that ‘Unless you have a legal right to do so, you must not hold back payment or refuse to pay anything you owe us because of a dispute between you’. Currently your account is three payment in arrears…and payment is due immediately’.

 

3 the Claimant claims:

 

(a) As no proof of contract, and no proof of any contractual terms actually exists between the parties, that the agreement must be declared void.

 

(b) If the agreement is not declared void then In accordance with the Act section 142(1)(b) the Claimant requests that the court declares the credit agreement unenforceable under section 65(1) by virtue of section 127(3).

 

© As no proof of contractual terms exists that allowed the creditor to charge interest and charges then the Claimant asks;

(i) for the return of all charges and interests paid on the account MBNA. Interest to be compounded and at MBNA's own rate of 24.9% as per Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited) (Respondents) v. Her Majesty's Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Appellants);

(ii) interest on BOTH at 14.9% (to replace the money taken, using Sempra as precedent) or alternatively should the court see fit at 8%.

(iii) Interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of xxxx.

 

(d) The removal of the account data and any defaults or negative markers registered with all Credit Reference Agencies;

 

(e) Court costs;

 

(f) Damages at the discretion of the court to compensate for harassment, distress and extra costs incurred by claimant.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am utterly fascinated, it seems excellent, but categorically (?) I am no expert, and hope to see someone with more knowledge than myself cast a critical eye over your POC....

It seems brilliant, perfect................

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am utterly fascinated, it seems excellent, but categorically (?) I am no expert, and hope to see someone with more knowledge than myself cast a critical eye over your POC....

It seems brilliant, perfect................

 

Thx Standing.. I was totally winging it and just following the guidance of some really helpful people here abouts, like Joncris and yourself! All power to ya..;)

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

BUMP!!

Can anyone advise on the POC!

 

Just got a call from MBNA on my answer machine. Some manager asking to discuss my letters (which I paded out somewhat). I may be getting somewhere!

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

BUMP.

can someone please check my POC and give some advice. Otherwise I will go as it is....

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA are threatening to take me to court which is actually what I want..given that I dont have to pay the court fee (save a fee bob up front). Is there any downside to wait for them to do this or should I initiate proceedings?

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*&%&^** The b%^^ards have found my original agreement!!!!

 

I received it in the mail only a few days ago. Very upsetting but time to shift gears and get my charges back (glad I didnt pay the £250 to initiate now). Here's my proposed letter:

 

************

I am in receipt of your letter dated 31st August 2007 attached to which appears to be my original credit agreement.

In your letter you remind me that there are 4 outstanding payments totalling £1268.28. It appears I must remind you that this account has been in dispute since 20th May 2007 instigated by my refund request letter of that date. From that time this account has been in dispute and as such NO INTEREST IS TO BE ADDED TO THE ACCOUNT; NO ACTION CAN BE TAKEN AGAINST ME; NO ADVERSE CREDIT REFERENCES OR DEFAULTS CAN BE LISTED AGAINST ME WITH CREDIT REFERENCE AGENCIES AND THIS ACCOUNT CANNOT BE PASSED ON DEBT COLLECTION AGENCIES. And lastly, I was NOT OBLIGATE TO MAKE FURTHER PAYMENT TO THE ACCOUNT.

.

However MBNA have continued to add interest to my account from the 20th May 2007 and as you are no doubt aware that is an unlawful action. I would ask therefore that you credit me the amount of interest charged since the 20th May 2007 to this account.

Further I am also asking that you now refund me the total amount of £2,338.40 as outlined in my reject Goodwill Letter dated the 20th July 2007 and addressed to Rachel Claridge Assistant Vice President, Customer Advocate Office; in which I state “I respectfully decline your further offer of good will in full and final settlement of my complaint. I repeat once again that I expect the immediate return of all charges and costs made on this alleged account from May 2001 to May 2007 totalling £2,338.40 which includes £763.00 of charges and interest of £1,575.40. I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.” However further charges have been added to this account since my letter of the 26th May and

In summary;

  • Please refund the amount of interest charged on the account since the 20th May 2007. This account was in dispute as of that time and NO INTEREST can be added to the account. Repayment should be made direct to my account
  • I hereby renew my request for refund of unlawful charges made to this account totalling £2,338.40 which includes £763.00 of charges and interest of £1,575.40. Regardless of the wording of any automated letters sent to me, these charges constitute a contractual penalty, as the amounts bear no relation to the actual loss incurred by you in relation to my breaches of the terms & conditions of my account. I remind you that such penalty charges are legally unenforceable. Even if a term exists in the contract that authorises penalty charges, such a term would be void, as it would be a clear breach of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, specifically sections 5-8.

In the Scottish case of Castaneda and Others v. Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1904) 12 SLT 498 the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This is also the position in English law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79.

At the time of my initial request MBNA were currently applying interest at the rate of 22.4% APR for unauthorised borrowing. I have applied the same rate to my request in accordance with current consumer contract legislation, as you have unlawfully applied penalty charges that you had no right to, which therefore amounts to your unauthorised borrowing of my money. Further, you denied me the opportunity to invest funds unlawfully taken from my account, denied me the economic benefit of these funds in the first instance, and have been unjustly enriched having been able to re-lend, and profit from money that rightfully belonged to me, at commercial rates.

Please return the total amount of £2,338.40 within 14 days of the date of this letter.

I reserve the right to commence court proceedings without any further notice should you fail to comply with my request, I will also submit a 1974 Act complaint to the OFT

I formally request that you make payment to me directly by cheque ONLY.

Yours sincerely

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to re-read various threads now on the basis of the above.....AS you know I applied for my CCA and got a letter basically telling me they didnt have it.... But few other people have received a letter such as mine, They are just going into default with most people and we are presuming (understandably) that they cannot provide it....

 

I wonder how many other people are going to receive their CCA's months after the request? It seems appalling that they are doing this, they are in criminal default after the first couple weeks, then 30 days..... you cannot suddenly redeem yourself and not be a criminal can you? Either they have got this information, or they haven't surely... why would it take so long to retrieve it, and where is the justification for it.....??

 

I hope that other people in similar situations as you Ony, are aware that this could happen.....

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Yea its a real pain in the **** but what can I do. Sent a complaint to OFT who replied that if they find the agreemetn months after they can still 'unforetunately' enforce the agreement. &*&%

 

Anyway onwards is the only way to go. Surprise surprise MBNA have nto responded to my earlier letter regards fees and charges so I am putting together my POC for them. As my letter states they continued to apply interest despite the fact that teh account was in default after my refund request and tehy couldnt find the agreement. Question, if they find the agreement X months after my CCA can tehy then expect to recoup all interest [and therefore charges] that they were criminal or is this then unlawfull????

 

I have the standard POC for charges and interest so thats OK, but for teh unlawful interest applied while account in dispute, will this suffice;

 

"The claimant further contends that:

 

from *********** to *********** teh Defendent continued to apply interest to this account despite teh fact that teh account was in dispute initatied by the Claimants refund request dated *****

 

(if it is unlawful to add interest when they ahve not provided the agreement i would add and the Defendents criminal failure to provide the original agreement upon the claimants request)

 

The Claimant claims;

a-return of interest amounting to ******

 

Cost allowed by the court

 

etc, etc

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone out there that can advise much appreciated as I want to initiate proceedings ASAP!

 

thx

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BUMP!!!! any help much appreciated....

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anybody out there!!!!

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...