Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • old and new threads merged most of the so called arrested at XXXX etc are FAKES to generate money for the certain website you shouldn't have any issues at all unless there was a UAE court claim against you  
    • Then you did exactly what you were supposed to do.  It's common sense that you would need extra time compared to an able bodied person. But Excel and its sister company VCS are the lowest of the low.  We have cases where they have ticketed people for stopping in a no-stopping zone near an airport - at a zebra crossing.  I'm not joking.  We have another case where someone caused a taxi to stop by stepping in front of it, again in a no-stopping zone, so they ticketed the taxt driver, they actually expected the taxi driver to continue driving and to murder the pedestrian.  Again, I'm not joking.  These are the people you are dealing with.
    • we can help with this and probably make 85% vanish if you want too start a new thread and tell us about it all. NEVER EVER PAY A DEBT COLLECTOR!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!! dx  
    • it never happens forget it shame you entered into pointless FmOtL letter tennis...
    • thanks nicky. im trying.. ive never had a pcn. im trying to read up and learn all this ...i may be slow as theres a lot to learn. i can't afford this charge and my friend definitely wont be able to pay even if it goes to court. didnt know about this website until google searched excel ..as was considering writing them a letter of explanation about the vulnerability of my friend as im worried she might suffer a breakdown. i think excel did send photos of the signs - there are 2 main ones...but one was blocked by an artic as you drive in - also if you look at the building there is a loading door next to pay&display machine which blocks the disabled bays too...so you cant drive to the bays opposite the machine only the joining bays a you go in.. if the disabled bays as you drive in are full and the artic is there delivering...disabled people cant get to the other disabled bays and pay machine...quite wrong really considering theres more accessible non disabled bays that aren't blocked by the loading lorry hello ftdave - yes when we realised we had to pay and realised we didnt have any coins or any coins in the car ashtray for the machine we left... it may have taken  more minutes than an able bodied person because i cant move as fast as i used to because of my arthritis
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just reached the Small Claims point


Wonunderpar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5865 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Barty.

 

Will therefore wait for a letter from my local court any day now.

 

You're such a help to so many people on this site. I'm sure it's appreciated by all of them and it's most definitely appreciated by me.

 

Thx again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi there wonunderpar, i am in exactly the same position as you.

 

I received Notice of Transfer to Plymouth County Court together with a copy of Lloyds defence on the 20th June and today i have received a Notice of Directions Hearing which is due to take place on the 22nd August at 2.50pm in Plymouth County Court.

 

However i am wondering what to do now as it doesnt ask for anything just simply says that i need to attend on that date. Do i need to prepare all my paperwork for Court? Also do i need to write to SC&M and offer them a chance to settle before the Court date?

 

I am a bit worried i know some cases have settled a couple days before the Hearing date and it is unlikely that Lloyds will attend but do i just have to sit tight and wait for the 22nd August to come?? What if Lloyds turn up and defend will i end up paying costs?

 

i cant help feeling a little out of my depth....:confused: :confused: :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoeyarscott,

 

I'm waiting with baited breath now for the next step.

 

I'm hoping that it won't be the Notice of Directions hearing as this isn't always required. When it is, it is usually to decide which track your claim will go in. It is usually only done for bigger claims. How much are you claiming back?

 

From reading other postings, I don't believe that you need to take a lot with you to this hearing, as it will be simply for the judge to decide (almost certainly) that you belong on the small claims track. However, it may be prudent to have your court bundle ready just in case, although it is not normally needed until you are requested to forward it to the court and **** prior to the actual case being heard.

 

Hope this helps but perhaps other site members can reinforce, confirm or correct what I have said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply wonunderpar

 

I am claiming back £2800 which is below the £5000 in order to deal in the small claims court.

 

I have been reading various posts all morning but i cant see that anyone had had a Notice of Directions Hearing and what they are doing/or have done.

 

I am hoping that SC&M will want to settle out of Court but it all takes its bloody time only another 6 weeks to wait!!!

 

I am just worried that i will be the one that ends up forking out:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again,

 

It won't cost you any more as you have gone down the small claims route. The only cost that you will incur is the court fee that you have already paid, whatever LTSB do next. However, because your claim is in excess of £2000, it seems that some courts are going down this 'Notice of Directions' route even though you are still under the small claims threshold.

 

Above all, don't worry though! it sounds as if you have followed correct procedure to the letter so far. I have seen this 'Nictice of Directions' being used before in a couple of threads but in each case it seems only to have confirmed that the small claims track is to be used.

 

I have also seen a 'nudge' letter used at this stage, to try and persuade **** to pay up now. It might not be a bad tactic. I'll try and find the threads that I've seen these in and post them up here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just today received a letter from LTSB 'Customer Service Recovery Centre' in Andover, which I haven't seen mention of on any of the posts so far.

 

It states:

 

"Complaint Reference xxxxxx

 

I wrote to you four weeks ago to update you on our investigation of your complaint.

 

I am really sorry we are still not in a position to respond fully to your complaint. because we have not responded fully yet, I want to ensure you understand your rights. So I am enclosing the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) explanatory leaflet, which sets out their role and how to make contact.

 

You will see from this leaflet that you do have the right to refer your complaint to the Ombudsman if you are unhappy with the delay. However, I would be grateful if you could please bear with us for a little so that we may try to reach an amicable conclusion.

 

I will continue to monitor the progress of your complaint and would like to take this chance to thank you for your continued patience.

 

Yours sincerely,"

 

I have a couple of comments about this:

1) It wasn't four weeks ago that they last wrote, it was on 16th May;

2) Grammatically it's not the best English I've ever seen!

3) they are obviously not aware of the actions that have taken place via MCOL and their own solicitors, or are chosing to ignore them;

4) At the end of the day, this is surely just another delaying tactic aimed at preventing me from continuing my action through the legal system isn't it?

 

If anyone else has experienced this, can they advise why happened next?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning I've received the form N157 "Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track".

 

Although the court date is still "to be advised" is this where I forward the letter etc mentioned by barty under 3rd July post above or should I still wait for a court date to be advised efore doing this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - now moving along quite quickly.

 

This morning I've received a letter from ****, as per the thread below:

 

Lloyds solicitors want more info

 

This is despite the fact that I've already sent them full details over a fortnight ago.

 

I'm happy to send the details again, together with a copy of my first letter and charges breakdown, however one thing that bothers me slightly is that the letter is dated Monday 9th July but I've only received it today. I'm guessing that this is partly due to the postal strike but still don't see why a letter postd on Monday would take six days to reach me. Will they see my delay in replying as a negative move, bearing in mind that they asked for a response within 14 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt that they note how long each claimant takes to respond to this letter :) . Providing they recieve what they want by 23rd July i can't see a problem.

Looks like your a step closer to settlement:D Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Kazzie,

 

Reply going back today by registered post / recorded delivery (whichever is best).

 

Cautiosly optimistic now but not going to count my chickens just yet.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance CJP.

 

For belt and braces, I replied to them as follows (may be useful for others who find themselves in the same position):

 

Dear Sirs,

In the XXXXXXX County Court

xxxxxxxxx -v- Lloyds TSB

Claim No: XXXXXXXX

Date Issued: XX/XX/2007

I am in receipt of your letter ref. XX/XXX/XXX dated xxxxxx xth xxxx, although only received by me on xxxxxxxx xxth xxxx 2007.

 

I have already forwarded the details that you have requested on xxth xxxx 2007, but as you appear neither to have received nor to have acknowledged receipt of those details, I am attaching another copy of them herewith, together with a copy of the accompanying letter.

 

In respect of the calculation of interest, this has been done in accordance with section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year for the period from xth xxxxxx 200x to xth xxxxx 2007. It does not include any interest incurred since that date until judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.021%.

Please note also that these figures do not include the court fee of £xxx which, due to your client’s prevarication, I have had to incur in this matter. This figure too should be added to the total claim amount.

My sort code with Lloyds TSB is xx-xx-xx and the account number in question is xxxxxxxx.

I await your earliest response.

 

Yours faithfully

Will keep everyone posted on the next steps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well how frustrating!

 

Waiting in anticipation for the next missive from [problem] and what do I get? Another (identical) letter to that under post #34 above but to both me and the wife because it refers to the joint account rather than my sole one.

 

Clearly the Black Donkey can't even communicate between departments, because if they could they would know that this is long since moved on from a complaint that the 'Customer Recovery Centre' are still dealing with.

 

I responded with a blunt response advising that they might like to speak to their solicitors to find out what's going on - I don't know if that was wise or not but sometimes you have to let off steam!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hilarious!!

 

Got home tonight to find a letter from - yes, you've guessed it - the Customer Service Recovery Centre in Andover (funny how they can suddenly send so many letters without charging a penny isn't it?).

 

The wording is practically identical to that in their letter dated 16th May advising me of how they have to charge for their services blah blah blah.

 

They really are in total disarray aren't they!!

 

Can't wait until this is all over and I can move to a proper bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I feel a little deflated at the overnight news. The settlement of my claim by LTSB was imminent, as I had received the "we are minded to come to a settlement. . ." letter from **** around two weeks ago. Now it seems that I will at best have to wait until next year before I receive the money and at worst I won't get it at all (should the banks be successful in the test case).

 

This has been going on for me since March and it now feels that LTSB have won simply by procrastinating so much that they have managed to reach this point, knowing that it would delay things for a much longer period. It's almost as if they knew this was coming and only had to keep delaying to reach their goal.

 

Aside from the court fee, which is neither here nor there, I feel as if I have wasted 5 months of effort. I still have faith that we are all correct in our assertion that the charges are unfair, but it feels like a kick in the teeth for those of us who haven't been repaid yet. Even when the banks lose the case, what's to stop them appealing it and delaying further still?

 

Sorry to be negative and I hope that the courts come down on the side of the consumer in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel the same. i issued through courts in march and have court date for sept. although first letters started last december. watching tv this morning it seems that the banks will ask for all current court cases to be stayed, but they will honour all current offers. so you ncould be okay as you have had your letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wonunderpar

 

I've been reading your thread since the start and been rooting for you all the way. What a kick in the teeth for you and everyone else. I know its not any consolation now, but you will get your money eventually. I cant imagine how angry and frustrating it must be for you all., really sorry mate :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks JB1,

 

I've been most grateful for your help along the way, which has greatly assisted in getting me this far. I guess if you've never had it you've never missed it and I shall just sit and wait for however long it takes now.

 

Thanks for your support anyway, which is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just heard that LTSB's profits for the first 6 months of this financial year are up to £2 billion, and that's after paying out millions already in repaid bank charges.

 

I'm a little confused now regarding where we are with ongoing claims. I understood that all was on hold pending the outcome of the OFT action, but some people still seem to be continuing with there action and others are still being paid out.

 

I haven't heard a word from [problem] since their letter of early July so I guess I won't now hear anything for months, pending the court case, or are they still continuing to deal with actions that had reached the "we are minded to come to an agreement" stage?

 

Any advice on what I should do next (if anything) welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just carry on with your claim, read these links for more info:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/107584-oft-test-case-what.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/108091-oft-banks-dont-panic.html

 

I read that about their profits :eek:

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...