Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rockinrodders Vs Barclaycard


rockinrodders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

SAR request sent on 11th May to Barclaycard Northampton address. included a photocopy of my drivers licence, plus a full list of all my previous addresses. Unfortunately the account was closed in 2003 and I do not have the card number.

 

Received a letter back yesterday saying they had no record of an account held by me at any of my addresses.

 

Obviously that's rat$hit as I have actually had two cards with them in the past although the first one was closed in about 1999, the second one was closed in 2003.

 

I even had a debt collection company contact me out of the blue about a year ago asking for payment of an outstanding balance of about £800 and place a default on my credit file. After complaining to Barclaycard and the DCA they eventually agreed that there had been an admin problem when I made the final settlement payment, they hadnt closed the account properly and the annual fee or whatever had been charged and had been spiralling for 3 years. They agreed it was a mistake and wiped all the adverse data etc straight away and apologised.

 

So how can they now say that I never had an account with them?

 

muppets!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am having the same trouble with NatWest.

 

I dont know if it works but what about sending them a copy of the default from your credit file and ask them to explain - why if they did not supply you with a credit card have they placed a default on your credit file? I assume that it is under Barclaycard card services?

 

If you are still having difficulty then e-mail [email protected] I gave her a wrong account number and she was able to find my account after I supplied her with all my previous address'.

 

Good Luck!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I re-read the letter that Barclaycard sent to me and noticed that it actually said that they could not locate my account and because it had been closed since 2003/4 they would no longer keep any details on it!

 

I thought they legally had to keep information for 6 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang the customer relations office at Barclaysham to follow up on why they couldn't locate my account. After a couple of minutes on hold, they found my account and it was still being handled by collections.

 

They said they couldn't find it as it was sold to a debt collector. Now the account was actually sold in error to the debt collector AFTER it was closed and I had paid off the balance. Its a long story.....

 

Anyway barclaycard said that although they can see that they had made an error and had not even thought to check with the collections area for the account, I would still have to send them the SAR request again, because they returned the cheque when they replied last time saying they had no record of an account.

 

Surely the original 40 day timescale is still in operation? Them not finding the account was purely a delaying tactic. They located it no problem when I rang them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Barclaycard sent me a load of statements, but only relating to 2004 onwards, so they're all blank because the account was closed in 2003

 

They reckoned it might be another 6 weeks for them to get the older data off their microfiche.

 

Its been 36/37 days sonce they received the SAR so Im not waiting another 6 weeks. Shall I write them the non-compliance letter or just get the ball rolling on with a prelim for charges and claim an amount 'to be confirmed'??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Its been well over 40 days and I still havent got the microfiche statements and this is where all my charges were as the account closed in 2002. It was the last 12 months where I think a lot of charges at least late payment and overlimit each month every month.

 

Does anybody know what their standard penalty charge was in 2002 ish? I will then write prelim based on estimate. They havent supplied the credit agreement either and that well well outside the timescale required.

 

I wrote to ICO but they just say they'll write to them and ask them to hurry up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know that it took 98 for my statements to arrive from a closed a/c, and that happened after I issued an LBA for non-compliance of LBA and threatened to report them to the IC.

 

You will get your statemtns but you will probably need to work hard to get them ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the intial delaying tactics of saying they couldn't find my account, I called and they found it in seconds. I sent a combined LBA for non compliance with a further demand for statements. They sent the first part of the statements within a couple of weeks, but unfortunately they were all from 2004+ but the account was closed in 2002-3 so all the statements were blank!

 

It is the older microfiche stuff that I am waiting for that they reckon 'we are not required to supply as we believe that it falls outside the DPA but as a gesture of goodwill we will supply what we can but will take a long time'

 

But the big charges period is 2001-2 and obviously they are taking as much time as they can so they can refuse to supply the earlier ones as they are outside the 6 year scope. Every month they delay they think they are saving themselves 2 x £20 for charges that become over 6 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the rest of my statements today dating back to 2002 when I opened the account. There was only £300 in charges.

 

When I settled the account in 2003 I paid them £163 short as agreed with them as full and final settlement with the DCA that was chasing the debt at the time.

 

I am not sure whether to bother reclaiming the charges or if its best to let sleeping dogs lie as presumably they will try and offset any repayment against the balance they wrote off in 2002.

 

I do not have a default on this account and am concerned that they might try and give me one in retaliation if I take them to court to reclaim charges.

 

Any else had similar experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...