Jump to content


Mum vs Shabbey


Blitzspear
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got the N.I. today, I know it might be a little tedious but could one of you kind wise souls let me know what stages i can expect now, and how best to deal with them.

There's loads of templates on this site, so many it make the ol' noggin spin :shock: , so just describe the steps and I will find the relevant template on here ;) .

Is there anything i can do to speed things up, and do I need to send in a list of charges etc to the court manager yet :confused: ?

 

Any help or advice will be gratefully recieved, and mum has already pledged to make a donation to the site, on my recommendation of course :D

 

The claim is for over £10,000 including court costs, so it's a whopper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bonnie :)

 

The link was helpful, although there is some sort of early motion to strike thingumybobs I can set in motion at certain stages of the court proceedings.

I've just recieved the N.I. from the court, so do I send a list of the charges I am reclaiming to the court manager now, or at a later stage?

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blitz, the schedule of charges should be attached to your N1, and copies sent to Abbey and the court

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charley, is that the N1 or the N.I.?

 

My mum's just recieved the notice of issue from the court today (31/05), proceedings were issued on 25/05, was that the N1 I issued proceedings with?

 

If so, I did it with MCOL, so I'd have to send the list of charges by post anyway.

 

Should I have sent them straight after issuing proceedings, or can i get away with sending them with a copy of all my court docs now (not forgetting a copy of all of it to shabbey of course ;) )

 

?

 

S'ok Charley, I've just found out my claim form was the N1, I'm not too late sending my list of charges etc off am I?, N1 issued 25/05, sending charges list 01/06???

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I ask is because I took my mum's N1 copy, cover letter, schedule of charges ..etc, into the county court, and the clerk opened them in front of me and I noticed that mum hadn't actually put a signature on the bottom, she'd just typed her full name.

 

Is this ok?

 

Mum says she does it all the time, and it's perfectly acceptable, you don't have to provide a written signature as such, just a basic typed signing of your name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Bitzpear

 

I'm not sure that this will answer your question but it'll bump your thread to the top and someone that knows any different should answer.

 

I can only go from my personal experience but when i took my N1 to court I hadn't signed it and the clerk said 'you need to sign the form', now what I don't know is what he'd have said if I'd typed my name.

 

It sounds like your mom's done this sort of thing before though, and if she's got her notice of issue it's probably OK ~ otherwise the court would have sent it back to her (wouldn't they?)

 

 

Hope it goes well for your Mom!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mum's done it before yes, but if its not legally binding then shabbey may play dirty and use it against her.

Mum had already recieved her N.I. before I took her charges schedule and copy of the online N1.

Mum did her N1 on the Moneyclaim website, and her N1 was signed with a typed signature, as you obviously cannot ink sign an online form can you?

 

I suppose if her typed sig is good enough for her online N1 then its good enough full stop.

 

I think :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I am a bit confused, did your mum do MCOL? if so what exactly is she taking to the court? byu by and large, i would say that , yes, you do have to sign. But as i am not sure what you are taking to the court, i cant say definitively

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mum did MCOL, and as there isn't much room for information on the online N1, I took a covering letter, copy of the N1, a schedule of charges, spreadsheets detailing the statutory 8% added interest, and an invoice for solicitors fees from a solicitor mum used (in vain) earlier in the case.

 

It's mum's cover letter with the charges that she didn't sign, just typed her full name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i think that there should be a signature, it sounds pedantic I know. Its a letter after all

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that the N.I. has been issued and the claim served, might it be prudent to send Abbey a little nudge letter offering to settle for a little less than the filed for 10k ?

Mum has said she'll take £8750, which is all the charges and interest the bank deducted, plus costs, and a little extra on top.

 

I was going to word the letter (which I will copy to the court) like this..

 

With a claim against you now served, I'm sure you can understand how serious I am regarding this matter.

That being the case, I now make an offer for acceptance from Abbey Plc, of the sum of £8750.00 (eight thousand seven hundred and fifty pounds), in an effort to bring a swift and timely end to this dispute.

I am sure both parties are in full agreement that, to waste any more of the courts time regarding this matter, would be disrespectful to the case appointed District Judge and to Her Majesty's Court Service.

In view of my aims for a swift resolution, the offer of acceptance of the above mentioned sum, is valid for seven days only, with the offer expiring on 12th June 2007.

If the offer is made by Abbey, I will accept the offer in full and final settlement of this case, and this case only.

It is for Abbey to note that I am prepared to go all the way to a court hearing in this case, as I believe it will set a bad precedent for banks such as yourselves, and if the case does go to court, please be aware that I will have the full support and backing of the Consumer Action Group.

 

Thoughts please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I sent the offer letter off, and was promptly ignored (you were right Lula).

I have now recieved the acknowlegement of service from the court, with Abbey intending to contest the whole of the claim, more stalling tactics from Shabbey no doubt, as they now have 28 days to file a defence.

I assume it's just a case of awaiting the details of Shabbey's defence now, and if they do not enter a defence, moving to suggest a strike out against them, and in the event that they DO file some sort of sham defence, using the CPR part 18 request against them?

With the claim amounting to over ten grand, would it not be prudent to use the CPR part 18 against them now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have now recieved the acknowlegement of service from the court, with Abbey intending to contest the whole of the claim, more stalling tactics from Shabbey no doubt, as they now have 28 days to file a defence.

I assume it's just a case of awaiting the details of Shabbey's defence now, and if they do not enter a defence, moving to suggest a strike out against them, and in the event that they DO file some sort of sham defence, using the CPR part 18 request against them?

With the claim amounting to over ten grand, would it not be prudent to use the CPR part 18 against them now?

 

bumpity bump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mum has recently (yesterday) recieved Shabbey's stock defence they issue in all court cases like this, you know the one, what is laughable is that they refer to my mum as 'he' in it ...lol, so very shabbey of them.

 

As the claim is for over ten grand, I am sending a request to Shabbey today under part 18 of the Civil Proceedure Rules, that should set the cat amongst the Triton House pidgeons :-)

 

Any advice is always welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of questions.

 

1) Has Shabbey ever responded to a part 18 CPR request, with the appropriate information (is it possible for them to)?, as I am sure they won't be able to.

2) Could my mum expect an offer off of the back of this request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...