Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BB-V-Halifax PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5685 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

some Questions...

1. have been chaseing halifax about PPI for some time, recieved paperwork after CCA request only to have it stolen [bet the thief was happy when he/she opened rucksack] Are halifax obliged to send documents again if i do another CCA ?

 

2. should i send a sar or cca to halifax insurers ?? or should i cover all bases and send both ??

 

3. as halifax,s insurers are based in Ireland [ halifax Insurance Irleland Ltd.] are they obliged by law to supply information.

 

many thanks for any advice given

 

regards BB

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

some Questions...

1. have been chaseing halifax about PPI for some time, recieved paperwork after CCA request only to have it stolen [bet the thief was happy when he/she opened rucksack] Are halifax obliged to send documents again if i do another CCA ?

 

2. should i send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) or cca to halifax insurers ?? or should i cover all bases and send both ??

 

3. as halifax,s insurers are based in Ireland [ halifax Insurance Irleland Ltd.] are they obliged by law to supply information.

 

many thanks for any advice given

 

regards BB

 

Hello Bumpty BaldyBaldwin;860577

 

Sorry you have been bumping around and nobody is looking.

 

Did they send your CA recorded delivery, so how do they know that you received it. ah ha. Maybe write a letter to say how sorry and disappointed you are in not receiving it. MMMmm:-D

 

The Ireland bit , what do you mean by that, did you apply to Ireland for the loan, I think not. It is the halifax bank that sold you the ppi. It is the bank that you are after not the insurance dept. if that makes sense:D

 

Absolutely send a sar, a full sar, asking for everything.

 

Credit agreement should come, breakdown of ppi payments, the interest and what rate that was applied to the premium and the lenght it ran over the loan.

 

All writtten correspondence between yourselves. Copies of telephone conversations etc. You want everything. Be warned that they might give it to you bit by bit and you may have to push and push., but you will get it all:-D

 

If you need help just ask:-D

 

BreadwonThe ppi acc

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply hellhas,

about the Irleland bit, whats happened is this...

took out a loan with halifax at local branch in england, fell into finacial difficulties, so got into arrears with loan, and good old halifax started lumping on charges, I then sent DPA to start reclaiming the charges back.

When documents eventually arrived i was shocked to see that a very expensive PPI had been added on.

I had never been told about it at time of taking out the loan, and had never recieved a policy.

I then sent them a CCA request and recieved a lot of paperwork including a signed copy of the PPI agreement. I had signed this believing it document relateing to the loan and not i to any PPI [i know, what an idiot, lesson to every one, never trust a banker]

Halifax also said that they had no other documents relating to the PPI and that i should contact there insurers direct, and gave me there address in Ireland.

So, thats the story up to now.

DPA on its way

 

Best of, BB

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

It does not matter that the Insurance company are based in Ireland, the fact is that the Agreement was taken out and signed in the UK and Halifax would be responsible as the selling agent of the Insurance. (The Insurance company are probably related to Halifax in some way too).

 

It does worry me that you have never had a policy from the Insurance, How the Hell (sorry hellhas ..no pun intended..lol) are you suppose to know the terms and conditions of the policy etc, if in fact a policy does actually excist. I would also send a SAR to the insurance company and see what information they have on you, and request a copy of the PPI policy relating to your loan account and ask for a breakdown of what payments have been made against the PPI policy.

 

You never know they may not even have a policy at all, It will be interesting to see what your SAR reveals..

 

Good Luck

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice..

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent off today, will let you now what turns up

 

Best of, BB

 

Brillant, just count the days now:D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck BB, if you need any further help just shout..

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hooray. . . .large package from the goodly people at halifax. . . two very proffesional looking folders full of illegable rubbish mostly regarding phone calls , not sure who to, as they never phoned me, none of the things i requested, policy. exclusions etc.

I feel a letter comeing on

 

as usual any help and advice mucho appro

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry about the mucho appro. . .that was my son. . .bless

 

Hiya BB,

 

I thought it was really coo:D

 

Maybe send this to them amend it to your details

 

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

Dear Sir/Madam

Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Loan Account no xxxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing to express my disappointment as regards to the lack of communication from yourselves to me, regarding the above account.

I sent a Subject Access Request on the 14th of January asking for all data held by your company to be released to myself. I have received nothing in any correspondence relating to the above account to date.

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 21st of September 2006 for the last 6 years bank transactions and I am sure that you are aware that I am in the process of taking legal action in respect to these unlawful charges.

I have again sent a separate SAR 14th January 2007, requesting all data that you hold in relation to the above loan and any information of previous loans held by your company.

The disclosure of personal data covered by Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 is required in that the following documents have not been forwarded to me.

All data and personal correspondence letters and telephone calls, between your company and myself relating to the above account and loan accounts previous. Details about payments made to you and details of any payment protection insurance with these loans.

 

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You have a further 17days to comply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

l

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

back up and running with this one.

over the last few months have been chaseing halifax to get more information.although reluctant to do so; Halifax have at last sent me a copy of the policy.

The policy confirms that the PPI was miss-sold due to pre existing medical conditions. In my case high blood pressure, this first manifested itself above 22 years ago when i was taken to hospital with a bad bout of palputations, ever since i have had constant checks by my GP and late last year i was hospitalised again with irregular heart beat and sky high blood pressure and am now on constant medication.

 

Now, this is the stupid bit (stupid of me that is) I have sinced recieved from halifax a copy of the credit agreement for the two loans and on both agreements i have signed the boxes agreeing to the PPI being added on to the loan. I know that sounds even more stupid (niave maybe??) but i just trusted the staff and signed were they told me to. But, as the staff at the branch never mentioned to me anything about PPI i had no reason to believe it was going to be applied to my loan.

 

Any comments gratfully received.

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

back up and running with this one.

over the last few months have been chaseing halifax to get more information.although reluctant to do so; Halifax have at last sent me a copy of the policy.

The policy confirms that the PPI was miss-sold due to pre existing medical conditions. In my case high blood pressure, this first manifested itself above 22 years ago when i was taken to hospital with a bad bout of palputations, ever since i have had constant checks by my GP and late last year i was hospitalised again with irregular heart beat and sky high blood pressure and am now on constant medication.

 

Now, this is the stupid bit (stupid of me that is) I have sinced recieved from halifax a copy of the credit agreement for the two loans and on both agreements i have signed the boxes agreeing to the PPI being added on to the loan. I know that sounds even more stupid (niave maybe??) but i just trusted the staff and signed were they told me to. But, as the staff at the branch never mentioned to me anything about PPI i had no reason to believe it was going to be applied to my loan.

 

Any comments gratfully received.

 

Hello BB,

 

Wondered where you had gone to your last post was about nine months ago.

 

Exactly you signed the box where you were told to and they did not discuss the terms and condition with you, pre-existing medical conditions.

 

Sort out your figures and get after them:grin:

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

have been trying to push halifax to admit that no checks as to the suitability of the PPI were carried out at the time of taking out the loan.

have received a reply from halifax, (including a copy of the policy, which i have never received before) saying i should read page 5 section 2 with regards to the eligability criteria. This section has a list of employment and medical conditions that could ineffective.

 

it would seem that what they are admiting to, is that there staff just sell a policy and it is up to the customer to try to work out if it is suitable to there needs.

Me thinks this clearly displays a lack of "a duty of care" on there part

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

BB, I have been scanning through the FSA's Regulations and guidelines on PPI (ICOBS - Insurance Conduct of Business Sourcebook) and it says under 6.4.5 that "A firm must draw a consumer's attention to the importance of reading the PP contract documentation before the end of the cancellation period to check that the policy is suitable for the consumer".

 

The Regulations are effective general rules under (s) 138 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and most of the rules within the Sourcebook create binding obligations on firms to behave in a particular manner. Is there any specific insistance in the documentation that relates to your original application which mentions contract documentation or a cancellation period?

 

Also, under ICOBS 6.4.4 It states that "A firm must privude a consumer with a policy summary within good time before the conclusion of a contract".

 

Did they ever ask you to complete a needs and benefits questionnnaire? ICOBS 5.2 states that 'firms must specifiy on the basis of information provided by the customer, the needs and benefits of that customer'. The Halifax never asked me to complete one of these (I'm assuming that these are those questionnaires which ask about back pain, cancer, asthma, hospital treatments, etc, as well as some employment questions).

 

I have also seen an article on Which? which states that it is 'the insurers responsibility to ensure that you are aware of the main conditions of the policy' and that clear expectations must be set as to the scope and limitations of the cover.

 

There was no reference attached to this quote, and I'm trying to ascertain whether it is explicit in law that this is the case. I believe that the Sale of Goods Act may cover this as it consider the 'fit for purpose' requirements but I suspect that this would be useful in both of our cases.

 

The other BB.

Edited by bathgatebuyer

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning BB

At the time of taking out the loan nothing was ever discussed about PPI. it only came to light that PPI was added on to my loan after a DPA request. there was never any mention of pre-existing conditions or employment status.

I have been sending of letters to HBOS asking for copies of the eligability/suitability checks that were done at time of taking out the loan and have just recieved a reply saying that. .

" at the time of my application, 30/01/02, it was not a requirement to consider suitibility but eligability would have been considered based on the information you provided and the appropriateness of the cover to your circumstances would have been taken into account"

I will be writing to him asking why no copy of the eligability check was included in my DPA request, as, surely the halifax would have made a note of my pre-existing medical conditions as to avoid confusion should a claim have ever arisen.

Finally, at last they have sent the figures for the PPI, 1,300+interest, will be having a go at the spread sheet later.

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely! Your insurance appears to have been taken out at roughly the same time as mine and the brick wall responses they have given you are similar to the responses I have had. I'm now at the Court stage and understand that the Halifax have filed their defence. Hopefully I'll receive a copy of this over the next few days.

 

As I've always said, I just want my money back as the policy that I had didn't provide cover for me at any point, not least when Halifax Ireland rejected it during an awful period of unemployment where I thought I was going to end up losing my home and my sanity. My heart still skips a beat whenever the phone goes at home as it just reminds me of what it was like to get 10 calls a day that summer from their Collections team chasing up debts while I falsely held out hope for their insurance to 'protect' me. They really are taking money from the sick and the dying and the desperate with these useless policies. I cancelled shortly thereafter (once I got back to work and feeling able enough to even open any white envelopes from banks), and it saved me £80 a month thereon.

 

The balance of my card is £750 now while it was once at nearly £13,000 as I used it to pay my mortgage, food, power, etc while I was out of work. Eventually my mortgage company paid out on that policy, but the Halifax was the only one who never. Their own peculiar exclusions meant that of the 4 cards I had, only 1 did not cover me. I'm firmly of the view that any unusual or unique exlusions relating to that policy should have been made known to me. ICOBS contained within the FSA Handbook appears to agree.

Edited by bathgatebuyer

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello bb,

 

this is from the bank templates library. Should help you.:)

 

6. Interest calculation spreadsheets

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...