Oh The Audacity of DG

[Castlebest]

And a new coat !!!!

 

pete

[Audreygreeneyes]

well bread and water for a week will do me no harm but must admit did get more than one new hat:o

[Audreygreeneyes]

i feel naked!!!!

[Castlebest]

But the typings improved

 

 

pete

[Audreygreeneyes]

erm it was my hat you were complaining about!!! really. there is no pleasing some........

[Castlebest]

I have no objections to naked ladies at all

 

pete

[johnnymitch]

I'll bet you haven't, Pete!

 

Where are you Auburn...............????

 

Come back with your hat - don't listen to that wind-up merchant!

 

I thought it was lovely, it was you , - individual ,making a statement..........

[johnnymitch]

How about this version, Auburn?

 

Thanks for asking me to have a look at it for you, I can re-jig it with a clear conscience now:

 

"Please find attached Forms N244 in relation to the above mentioned case, along with supporting documents. I would respectfully request that these are passed to the Judge for the allocation of a hearing date.

 

My concerns in relation to this are set out in part C of my statement attached. I really do believe that this stay would not maintain the status quo, as it favours the bank by preventing the claimant’s pursuit of it’s legitimate remedy without placing any restrictions on the bank’s activities whatsoever and allowing them to further abuse the court process.

 

It is my contention that they had no intention of defending this case in court, as they have not done so thus far and I believe they are using the OFT test case in the same manner. By requesting stays quoting the ‘Test Case’ they are further delaying and abusing the court system for the bank’s own gain.

 

Attached is part C of my supporting evidence with regard to this matter."

[freakyleaky]

Where has your sheep gone auburn?????

[Castlebest]

The big point you have to get over is HSBC (DG) have just been delaying things and using the court system to do this, They had no intention of defending any case in court and you believe they are using the OFT test case in the same manner.

 

If the banks refuse to accept the courts judgement it the test case and keep appealing to higher and higher courts the case could drag on for years (my thinking is six years and they will clean up there act in the mean time) this would efectivly time bar a lot of the claims they are looking at currently and you can bet they will try to get the time bar included in the outcome of the test case to limit their liability.

 

pete

 

 

Did you see today's news, the Banks are revising their charges structures but are advising people the new charges will cost everyone aprrox £300 a year...

 

Well that will do me, it beats my £150 a month hands down !!!! but I still want the money they have already taken back !!!

 

pete

[Noddy73]

Which news?

 

So £300 per year. Does that mean we get

* good saving interest rates

* good borrowing interest rates

* quick money transfers

* free withdrawals

* good fx rates

* same or more branches

* call centres that understand our needs and the UK banking system

* etc.

 

Also this means we hopefully can compare the costs and start switching. A bit of competition would drive that price down.

[Audreygreeneyes]

ok am now filling inthe N244 and there are 2 things needed here urgently......lol.

 

in part 2 it asks what order am I applying for, I take it this is " removal of the stay"?? and also attach a draft order if possible. where can I get one of those???????

[Noddy73]

A, did DG send you a copy of the N244. Have you ask the court for a copy.

 

Just think that DG might have pulled a fast one and clicked the "both parties agree" or something like that.

[Audreygreeneyes]

I got the form straight from the court on the 6th when I called in to see if it had been stayed........the only thing I have EVER received from DG is the letter onthe 3rd telling me they were applying for a stay.............

 

DG have not filled on in...... it is me who is requesting a hearing ot have the stay set aside.

[Audreygreeneyes]

jsut

[Audreygreeneyes]

just revamped the letter

 

Dear Sir,

 

Claim Number7QZ45507

 

 

please find attached Forms N244 in relation to the above mentioned case along with supporting documents. I would respectfully request that these are passed to the Judge for the allocation of a hearing date.

 

 

 

 

My concerns in relation to this are set out in my part C statement attached as I really do believe that this stay would not maintain the status quo, as this stay favours the bank’s by preventing the claimant’s pursuit of its legitimate remedy without placing any restrictions on the bank’s activities whatsoever and allowing them to further abuse the court process.

They had no intention of defending this case in court as they have not done so thus far and believe they are using the OFT test case in the same manner. By requesting stays quoting the test case they further delaying and abusing the court system for the bank’s own gain.

The claimant is strongly opposed to such a stay, upon the basis that the defendant, both during and prior to this litigation, has ignored all prior attempts by the claimant to narrow the issues in dispute, or otherwise engage in meaningful dialogue which may have facilitated an amicable settlement to these matters.

Attached is part C is my supporting evidence with this regards

 

 

[rob-the-viking]

Good luck with your letter Auburn, it looks fine to me! Perhaps you should enclose a bribe for the judge???

 

A packet of chocolate hobnobs would certainly get MY attention........ That or gratuitous nudity anyway!!!

 

I' d go with the biscuits personally, judges are all dipped in the weird tank at birth, so nudity probably have no affect.

[Audreygreeneyes]

Thanks Rob, maybe I should go all clad out in leather with whips and chains??? or shoudl I save that for the hearing!!!.....lol

 

right on my way in to town to hand this little lot in and sen dit via fax and reg to DG........

 

let battle commence.............

[freakyleaky]

Good look auburn! Whatever you wear don't wear the same outfit you are wearing in that picture!

[rob-the-viking]

I think she looks very fetching freaky!!!

 

lol

[freakyleaky]

I did prefer the "sheep on head" look! But that says more about me and my thing for sheep! LOL:D

[johnnymitch]

I agree with you Freaky - I liked the hat!

[freakyleaky]

That is the difference between you and me! You liked the hat, I liked the fact it reminded me of a sheep! (I need help!) LOL

[johnnymitch]

maybe I should go all clad out in leather with whips and chains???

 

Now if you put that on your avatar Auburn..................

[Audreygreeneyes]

Pete told me to get a new hat so I did.......... now i hav gotten another one just for you freaky. leave it with me Johnny and I will see wha tI can do........

 

ok took the paperwork into the court this am and they looked a little surprised at a hearing being requested!!! this is usually reserved for solicitors..........

 

oh right was my reply....