Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vs The Big Boys


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Prelim letter sent req c£820 in charges in last 4 years

very nice respone 1 week l8r from A&l saying sorry to learn of your dissapointment with our services blah blah blah enclosing a leaflet saying someone will get back to me within 28 days.

do i wait 4 this next response or do i go by my timetable as i stated in my prelim letter?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your timetable, not theirs. You have given them 14 days. Day 15 you can progress onto the next stage if they have not acted accordingly.

 

Keep us posted how you get one.

 

Neil.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , just alter any of the letters to suit your case.

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter recieved today 13/06/06

"OUR CHARGES R REASONABLE BLAH BLAH BLAH"

"OMBUDSMEN BLAH BLAH BLAH"

"IF WE DO NOT HEAR FROM U WITHIN 8 WEEKS WE WILL CONSIDER CASE CLOSED"

THIS IS OBVIOUSLY WHERE THEY EXPECT PEOPLE TO SAY OK , AT LEAST I TRIED , AND TO GIVE UP.

NOW ITS TIME TO GO TO THE NEXT STEP,I HAVE ALREADY REGISTERED WITH MONEYCLAIM AND WILL USE PREVIOUS THREADS IN FORUM TO FILE MY CLAIM.

SHOULD I WAIT UNTIL THE FOURTEEN DAY PERIOD HAS EXPIRED ON MY PREVIOUS LETTER OR ACCEPT THAT THE "FOB OFF" LETTER THEY SENT ME IS THEIR FINAL WORD?

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter recieved today 13/06/06

SHOULD I WAIT UNTIL THE FOURTEEN DAY PERIOD HAS EXPIRED ON MY PREVIOUS LETTER OR ACCEPT THAT THE "FOB OFF" LETTER THEY SENT ME IS THEIR FINAL WORD?

 

I'd be tempted to play it by the book - stick to the original timetable. Its saying "I won't be goaded. We're playing by my rules now."

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks young and free

thats what i thought.

when filling in money claim form its actually difficult not to copy the the words by bankfodder in the bank templates libary . i know he says its not a template but some of us cant put our views into words so easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just filling out moneyclaim online will not be sending yet as 14days not up yet

hows this so far(nicked most from previous forum users)

 

Claim for refund of punitive charges on account xxxxxxxxxx

Action is on the grounds that I had a contract with the defendant bank and which was conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I’m claiming the return of money taken by the defendant in the way of charges over the last 4 years plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

Please note that under section 69 of the county courts act I shall be calculating all charges made against me with an additional 8 % interest.

I have repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so.

 

There are 27 occasions of charges between the dates of 06/09/02 and 02/09/05 with a total cost of £788.00 and £48.72 in interest charges total £836.72 .A schedule of all charges is available.

BIT CONFUSED WITH 8% INTEREST CHARGES THE ABOVE FIGURE IS WITHOUT THEM SHOULD I PUT CHARGES AS £836.72 + 8% INTREST £1013.40.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAD TO ALTER PREVIOUS VERSION TO BE ABLE TO FIT I MONEYCLAIMS

LIMITED SPACE

DOES THIS SEEM OK TO EVERYONE AND WHEN THE TIME IS DUE TO FILE USING THIS.

Claim for refund of punitive charges on account XXXXXXXXX

Action on the grounds that I had a contract with the defendant bank and which was conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I’m claiming the return of money taken by the defendant in the way of charges over the last 4 years plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

under section 69 of the county courts act All charges against me will be liable to 8% intrest.

 

There are 27 occasions of charges between the dates of 06/09/02 - 02/09/05 with a total cost of £788.00 and £48.72 in interest charges = £836.72

with 8% total £1013.40

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good to me, you've added all of the main points in. Good luck with the 8% :)

Lloyds TSB - Data Protection Act sent 19/05/06, received 1/06/06

Pre sent 02/06/06 asking for £2501.06, received 13/06/06 Blah Blah Blah

LBA sent 20/06/06, received BLahblhALBhl

.....

Sent off AQ to the courts.....just waiting now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good to me, you've added all of the main points in. Good luck with the 8% :)

 

8% is absolutely fine at this stage. Sorry I can't comment on what you have put in the claim as I still need to get my head round the whole Moneyclaim thing.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FILLING THIS MONEY CLAIM FORM OUT IS NOT AS EASY AS I THOUGHT YOU ONLY GET 24 LINES AND 1080 CHARACTERS NOTNEARLY ENOUGH.

ANYWAY MY FILING DATE IS 22/06/06 AND THIS IS MY FINAL DRAUGHT FOR CLAIM

PLEASE ANY AMMENDMENTS OR OBSERVATIONS THX

 

Claim for refund of punitive charges on acc

XXXXXXXXX.Action on grounds that I had a

contract with the defendant which was

conducted by their standard terms and cond.

I’m claiming the return of money taken by

the defendant in charges over 4 years plus

the interest levied on those charges. The

bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and unenforceable as they are con-

trary to common law. Further, as a dispro-

portionate penalty they are invalid under

the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4

and under the Unfair Terms in consumer

contract regs 1999. Para.8 and sch.2 (1)

(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15.Under sec 69

of the county courts act All charges will

be liable to 8% annual intrest 0.022%

daily .There are 27 charges between the

dates of 06/09/02-02/09/05 with a total

cost of £783.50. and £44.68 intrest.total +

8% intrest on penalties =£1012.10.22/06/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

Court Claim Filed On 22/06/06

Recieved An Acknoledgment Of Service Of My Claim From A&l They Have Got Themselves Solcitors

 

Group Legal Services

Carlton Park

Narborough

Leicester

 

And Have Taken The Maximum 28 Days In Which To File Their Defence

Which They Have Ticked The Box They Intend To Defend All Of The Claim.

The Lines Have Been Drawn.

Must Admit Flapped A Little At This Point But This Is The Norm Right?some support at rhis point would be appreciated,any comments?advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been away for the w/e, so just catching up!

 

Must Admit Flapped A Little At This Point But This Is The Norm Right?some support at rhis point would be appreciated,any comments?advise?

 

Hey, Jimbo.

 

I wouldn't worry at the moment if I were you - look round the site and you'll see it isn't the 1st time they've made the same threats.

 

Though I'm no expert, I'd say they are probably just rattling their sabres in the hope of frightening you. And let's face it, who wouldn't be frightened in your situation?

 

You knew before you started that there is always the risk of having to go all the way on this - and that means court. So 'gird your loins' just in case.

 

However, take hope from the fact that they have gone this far before only to cave soon after.

 

I'm a great believer in crossing my bridges only as I come to them, no point anticipating the worst dude.

 

Take heart from the fact that every A&L victim is rootin' for ya.

 

Luck dude. :cool:

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Youngnfree

Sometimes We Just Need Someone To Tell Us To Stick To Our Guns And Not Get Down Thats Why These Forums Are Great

No Response Yet From A&l Will Keep Thread Updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest you have a look at the latest developments on Weaver440's thread as this explains a lot regarding the banks'/b.s.' threats to contest the claim.

Apparently it's just the process they have to go through to be able to close the books at the court.

Hope this is true in your case too. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update

Alliance And Leicester Have Paid Out In Full £1138.08 Which Includes My Court Costs.:)

Many Thanks To All Who Gave Me Advise Along The Way And It Goes To Show All Others That If You Follow The Set Timetables And Set Route They Pay Up.

Obviously With No Admission Of Liability And Also A Statement That As I Dont Agree With Their Regime They Will Be Contacting Me In The Future To Discuss My Account,

Who Cares :D I Followed Advise And Got Parachute Account Anyway

I Will Be Making A Donation To The Site Because Without It I Would Never Have Had The Nerve To Go This Far .

Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

How far into the case did you get before they paid up? Mine went to the court on the 3rd they acknowledged on the 10th, I got another snotty letter saying cos I had gone overdrawn, because of charges they were going to charge me again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...