Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
    • So, your response was not received by the SCP as you did not send it with a valid stamp. Therefore, from my two option in post #14, the first option is the only one available to you, but you do not have the option of asking to be sentenced at the fixed penalty level as the reason the SCP did not receive your response was down to you. Here's a reminder of what to do: Respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box state that you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. This is a tried and tested method to deal with your problem and is almost always successful. Before the pandemic it was necessary to attend court to do this "deal" because it needs the agreement of the police prosecutor.. During the pandemic courts made every effort to have as few  people as possible attend and they began doing this deal under the "Single Justice" procedure without the defendant's attendance. Some courts have carried this procedure on whilst others have reverted to a personal attendance being necessary. If you are required to attend, your case will be taken out of the SJ procedure and you will be given a date for a hearing in the normal Magistrates' Court. If that is the way they do it in the area involved you will have to attend, see the prosecutor and offer your "deal" in person. 
    • what device are you using? copy all the questions then come here to this thread and paste them. then answer each question click on red give answers here. when done  hit submit reply bottom right.  
    • No because it's locked. You need to copy the relevant part of the questionnaire and paste it into this thread. That way you can overwrite. HB
    • Hi  I'm not able to overwrite the red writing to give answers on the questionnaire.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help, Barclaycard have found me!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I need a little bit of advice with Barclaycard. It has been unpaid since November 2005 and until today I haven't heard anything from them. I sent my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on April 23rd, and today I have received a letter from Buchanan Clark and Wells debt colleting agency asking me to contact them to settle the full amount! (£815.27) I had some idea that this might kickstart them into coming after me for their money, but haven't really thought about how to deal with it!

 

The letter seems to be the usual stuff (I've received quite a few letters from DCA's in my short time!) but one bit of it says:

 

'Unless you make arrangements to settle the account within 72 hours our agent may be instructed to attend your premises to establish your residency and reason for non-payment'

 

What does this mean? Bailiffs?? Although I'm probably not as concerned about this as I have no intention of letting them in my house at all!

 

My claim for charges will amount to around half of the outstanding amount, plus a claim from Barclays itself will roughly add up to the other half. I have read somewhere that no collections action can be taken against an account where the amount owed is in dispute but who do I contact? And how do I go about it?

 

Any help you can give would be very much appreciated! Should I call Buchanan Clark and Wells? Write to them? if so what should I say???

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

I need a little bit of advice with Barclaycard. It has been unpaid since November 2005 and until today I haven't heard anything from them. I sent my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on April 23rd, and today I have received a letter from Buchanan Clark and Wells debt colleting agency asking me to contact them to settle the full amount! (£815.27) I had some idea that this might kickstart them into coming after me for their money, but haven't really thought about how to deal with it!

 

The letter seems to be the usual stuff (I've received quite a few letters from DCA's in my short time!) but one bit of it says:

 

'Unless you make arrangements to settle the account within 72 hours our agent may be instructed to attend your premises to establish your residency and reason for non-payment'

 

What does this mean? Bailiffs?? Although I'm probably not as concerned about this as I have no intention of letting them in my house at all!

 

It means their agents - i.e. employees. They have no legal powers, and if you ask them to leave three times they must do so. If they refuse, call the police and tell them someone is tresspassing on your land and you are afraid of a breach of the peace.

 

My claim for charges will amount to around half of the outstanding amount, plus a claim from Barclays itself will roughly add up to the other half. I have read somewhere that no collections action can be taken against an account where the amount owed is in dispute but who do I contact? And how do I go about it?

 

Just write to them informing that the amount is in dispute, because you believe that the account was made up from penalty charges that are illegal. Inform them that you sent them a S.A.R. and plan to reclaim any charges, and ask them to investigate the matter.

 

Any help you can give would be very much appreciated! Should I call Buchanan Clark and Wells? Write to them? if so what should I say???

 

don't call. Everything recorded or special delivery.

 

Thanks

..

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sending a SAR does not put the matter in dispute, non compliance with a CCA request does that. If you haven't sent a CCA request my advice would be to send one, to establish if an agreement exists. They have 12 working days to furnish it, from date of receipt. Non compliance after this time, puts the a/c in default. If after one month the agreement hasn't been provided the creditor commits a summary criminal offence.

 

You should claim back the penalty charges which are unlawful not illegal. You should also claim damages under The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, for the imposition of the charges and interest on said charges.

 

NEVER contact them by telephone, everything must be in writing which can be proven. You have no way of proving what you say to them or vice versa in a telephone call, unless you plan to invest in recording equipment. Any conversation with a creditor/DCA will invariably get unpleasant, threatening and nasty, so unless you are of the sort of disposition where you relish a fight, can really hold your own and quote the law at them-avoid speaking to them! Keep a record of all calls from them, even if you don't answer. Number, date, time etc... If you do happen to pick up a call, don't go through security Q's with them, simply say you have no way of verifying who they are and for Data Protection reasons are unable to continue the call and ask that they put whatever they want to discuss in writing.

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

You should claim back the penalty charges which are unlawful not illegal. Laiste.:)

 

Eeek!:o Yes, a very important point. Post in haste, regret at leasure:)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eeek!:o Yes, a very important point. Post in haste, regret at leasure:)

 

LOL,:p Tomterm!

 

Very easy mistake! When you have to digest such a lot of legal info and pass on the benefit of your knowledge and experience to others, sometimes you can forget what your name is, (well I do:rolleyes: )never mind everything else! You always give good, helpful advice to lots of people which is what counts!:)

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Thanks so much for your replies. I knew that the SAR didn't put the account in dispute- that's where I started to panic because I hadn't got to the stage where it was yet, so didn't know if I could use that or not! I'll follow your advice and let you know what happens, I am definately NOT the kind of person who can deal with telephone confrontation well so will avoid speaking to them at all. :eek:

 

Now I have an idea of how I should go about tackling this, I feel so much calmer. Thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...