Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Here I go !!!!


GetEvenWithAbbey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, after reading about all the successes on here, and being thoroughly hacked off with Abbey right now, I am sending off my request for statements. Just 6 years to start with. But if I enjoy it as much as you all seem to - back to opening the account in 1976 could be great fun.

 

Wish me Luck

 

Martyn:)

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you send a properly worded SAR using the template letter from this site they are supposed to send you all info they have, this means back to when you opened the account, not just six years.

 

They'll try telling you they only hold six years but remind them you've sent a SAR and they soon agree to let you have everything.

 

Good luck, and welcome to the club. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Robdblynd, done just waht you said.

 

Should take a month of Sunday's to wade through that lot !!!!!;)

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least it'll keep you out of mischief. ;)

 

And just think of how much you might be able to reclaim, and all that interest you'll get cos the muppets won't settle before you've issued a claim. It's the best savings account on the planet, where else would you get a minimum of 8% pa? :cool:

 

Keep us posted on how you get on, and good luck with the wading through, you'll probably needs specs by the time you've finished. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sent off for SAR 2 weeks ago by recorded delivery - but not heard anything - not even an acknowledgement !! Rude I know - but unusual???

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not at all unusual.

 

You should receive 14 months of copy statements fairly soon, then probably a useless piece of paper which is a spreadsheet of charges but only gives the number each month of each charge and a total per month.

 

You then write and remind them they haven't properly fulfilled your SAR request, they eventually get their finger out and send you the rest as phocopies of microfiche and then your work really begins.

 

That's been the format just recently, but don't let them off the hook, they've got 40 days to fulfil a SAR, so I'd remind them when it's nearly up. Put a heading on your letter that catches their eye otherwise you'll end up in the pile of 'to do' things that hang about a bit.

 

Good luck. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martyn,

 

this section helps if abbey are non comliant with your data request, I sent a LBA (Letter Before Action) 7 days before the time limit was up:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

If Abbey still fail to comply report them to the ICO (Information Comissions Office) using the below website link including copies of your correspondence to Shabbey:

Data Protection Complaints – Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)

 

Also make sure you send your correspondence by Special Delivery as you can check on the royal website to confirm it has been delivered.

 

Any way best of luck!

 

Leecabs :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob and Lee,

 

Blimey if I'm getting impatient now - just think what I will be like in a couple of months time !!!!!!!!!:lol:

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not at all unusual.

 

You should receive 14 months of copy statements fairly soon, then probably a useless piece of paper which is a spreadsheet of charges but only gives the number each month of each charge and a total per month.

 

You then write and remind them they haven't properly fulfilled your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request, they eventually get their finger out and send you the rest as phocopies of microfiche and then your work really begins.

 

That's been the format just recently, but don't let them off the hook, they've got 40 days to fulfil a SAR, so I'd remind them when it's nearly up. Put a heading on your letter that catches their eye otherwise you'll end up in the pile of 'to do' things that hang about a bit.

 

Good luck. :)

 

Hi just had a quick look at this and wondering have I done something wrong!! Is the summary of bank charges no good?? I have statements back to 2005 and they have sent me some form of print off for 2001 to 2003 but 2004 is on one of these summary of bank charges. Do I need to request actual statements for this period? I didn't use an SAR I just phoned up and asked only just found this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the print off is the one they're sending out at the moment it will be a spreadsheet style list, printed in landscape, with headings like 'Month of Charge', Total Cleared Transaction Charges', Number of Cleared Transaction Charges', in heading across the top and on the right hand side there is a heading of 'Refunds' with similar lists underneath it.

 

Don't panic though, cos within 2 weeks of getting that I got my microfiche copies.

 

The problem with the spreadsheet summary they send you is it's not any use when you need the actual dates of charges etc, which they ask for in their defence. On the basis that you might have to go into court, you need accurate information. You could just say that as your charges always came out on a particular date you have used that date in the absence of detailed information from Abbey.

 

I'ts nothing to get yourself worried about, use the summary to add up your charges and when the other stuff comes through you'll be able to put in the details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, 3 weeks after sending SAR I have recieved a single spreadsheet page covering Jan04 - Mar 06 from Pam Speed, with the assurance I shall recieve other details within 5-7 days.

 

I am just preparing template 1 for non-compliance as the spreadsheet is not acceptable - is this correct???????????

 

By the way - charges in this two years are £1800 !!! Going back to 1976 and including the last year, this could be a biggy !!!!!

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like standard their standard practice to me. Initially, I didn't even send statements, I pretty much just said 'give me my money!' - and they did, 18 months worth, anyway. Then I requested my statements (which also took ages to arrive, so nothing unusual there!), highlighted the charges, sent them off with a much more thorough letter, got rejected, started court proceedings... leading them to drag their heels even more.

 

Long story short - they'll drag their heels on everything, but it's undeniably fun and totally to be worthwhile sticking it to the man!

 

Good luck!

~Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do no thave the best credit score at the moment !!! And am also overdrawn with ShAbbey.

 

Can anyone suggest a Bank that I could open an account with, I would need one with a debit card as work takes me abroad a fair bit.

 

Thanks:?

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again Martyn,

 

glad to here its coming along, I opened a bank account with Barclays. They gave me a overdraft matching my Shabbey account one and let me transfer my debt all without depositing a penny! Then they let me take a month or two to transfer my direct debits and pay check over. As you probably know these can take some time to organise.

 

I just went into the bank and saw one of their account managers, I took out an additions plus account which gives you:

Travel Insurance

Mobile Phone Insurance

Break Down recovery

Payment Insurance

Death Payment

and so on

 

It does cost 14.99 a month but I was paying more than that with all the other stuff.

 

And no I dont work for Barclays but they were helpful, they had just better never charge me! LOL

 

I would also recommend not saying the reason im changing bank is because im taking them to court.

I just said im fedup with the service Abbey have offered to me over the past 17 years!

 

Anyway its up to you I have heard Alliance and Leicester are very helpful. But they dont have as many branches.

 

Good luck!

 

Leecabs :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks leecabs.

 

I'll try Barclays

 

I'm just plaing safe in case ShAbbey get arsey and close my account or call in my overdraft.

 

Thanks

Martyn:oops:

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my statements through back to 30/01/01. Have had an account with them since the mid 70's, and although I asked for ALL statements since account opened, this is all I got.

 

I'm proposing to

1) treat 30/01/01 to today as 1 claim

2) bang off non-compliance letter for remainder of statements

3) new claim for pre-30/1/01

 

Does that sound right???

 

Martyn

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martyn,

 

Yep thats what I would do best to keep them seperate, that way you can focus on what you have and then proceed with a 2nd claim when you get all the statements which may take a long while considering the amount of them there must be!

 

So the next step is to tot up the charges and any charged overdraft interest for the last 6 years so best to go from 30/06/01 to Todays date as when you enter the claim it will be around the 30/06/07 the last 6 years.

 

You should find the prelim letter on this link:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/671-2-letter-preliminary-approach.html

 

and this link will help you find the spreadsheet to tot up the charges:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

Remember dont add the 8% interest on at this stadge that comes later.

 

Good luck any queries give us a shout.

 

Leecabs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Leecabs

 

Didn't realise I could charge overdraft interest as well!!!!!!!!:p

 

I'll go back over my spreadsheet and add those in now.

 

Thanks again ----- more coffee needed NOW;)

 

Martyn

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martyn please take a look at this from the FAQ's:

 

1) Overdraft Interest paid by you on the charges

This is the amount of interest the bank charged you for being overdrawn. You can only claim the proportion of interest charged on your charges, as opposed to any charged on spending. The Advanced spreadsheet will help calculate this amount. The Overdraft Interest figures should be included within your Preliminary letters to the bank.

 

Good luck I couldnt get my head round this bit on my claim!

 

Leecabs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'll take a look at it.

 

Thanks

 

Martyn

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning All,

 

Just going to Post Office to send my Prelim Letter and copy of spreadsheet to Pam Speed. Asking for £2966.50, going back to end of Jan 01.

Also chasing her up for statements back to 1976 !! That should be fun !!!:D

11.05.07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

29.05.07 Spreadsheet received

29.05.07 Non-compliance letter sent

31.05.07 Statements back to 30/1/01 received

01.06.07 Prelim sent requesting £2996.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...