Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

poorkaren v LloydsTsb


poorkaren
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I just wanted to check (and seek some reassurance) that the reply from Birmingham after a preliminary approach for repayment that everyone is getting is the same as mine. I was surprised to recieve a two page letter that went on about me being aware of charges as they are available for all and that they are entitled to charge for additional work and that I have a responsibility to manage my account within their terms and conditions... they may withdraw cheque books etc and they will support referral to the Ombudsman...?

 

Is this standard and is doing nothing til the 14 days are up best?

Also, if they are suggesting me moving my account, can they close it down, i have an overdraft facility at the moment and wondered where i stood with being forced to repay it?

Any support and/or reassurance appreciated

Thanks

Karen:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen,

 

Looks like your at the same stage as me! I received that very same letter this morning, so yes, looks like its a standard one. As they have replied, you should probably go ahead and send the LBA straight away. Thats what im doing anyway, it'll be in the post first thing tomorrow morning.

 

As far as your account goes, yes they CAN close it but as i understand it they very rarely do. Keep looking round the site, im sure you'll find all the answers your looking for.

 

Good luck, and let me know how you get on.

 

Gary

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen,

Yes I got the same reply as you so dont worry your not alone. I waited the full I4 days before sending the LBA in today.

Theres mixed feelings on this, you can send LBA in after getting the sod off reply from them but some prefer to wait the 14 days. I read a remark from B/F somewhere " to be as good as your word, no more no less ". So I was did what I said I would in the prelim letter.

Hope this helps and good luck what ever you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would wait until your 14 days are up. The point of that is to show the court (should it get that far) that you have given the bank every opportunity to respond positively to your request.

 

You stated that they had 14 days to respond. They have done, but they still have time to change that response. Now, we know they probably won't, but in court, you will be able to show that you gave the bank a full 28 days (i.e. 14 days after the prelim letter and a further 14 days after the LBA) to respond before issuing action. Both you and the bank have a duty to try and resolve the matter before going to court. Issuing an LBA 4 days after sending the prelim letter might be viewed as being a little hasty, and not giving the bank ample time to "see the error of their ways".

 

My advice would be to wait until your initial 14 days are up.

... a little

Mahala is a powerful thing ...

 

If you like my advice, please click the scales.

All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice.

Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed

Simply Be: settled in full

Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable.

If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with mahala and StoneLaughter.

 

At each step, work to your own stated timeframe and do not be swayed from it. By responding prior to 14 days you show the bank that their actions influence yours, and they should not - remember that you are in control of your claim.

 

Regards,

Bean

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen,

 

Yep, pretty much identical down to the letter. I've been writing the full text of the letters I've recieved out in my own thread, if you want to double check it against the one you've recieved :)

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would wait until your 14 days are up. The point of that is to show the court (should it get that far) that you have given the bank every opportunity to respond positively to your request.

 

You stated that they had 14 days to respond. They have done, but they still have time to change that response. Now, we know they probably won't, but in court, you will be able to show that you gave the bank a full 28 days (i.e. 14 days after the prelim letter and a further 14 days after the LBA) to respond before issuing action. Both you and the bank have a duty to try and resolve the matter before going to court. Issuing an LBA 4 days after sending the prelim letter might be viewed as being a little hasty, and not giving the bank ample time to "see the error of their ways".

 

My advice would be to wait until your initial 14 days are up.

 

But the letter says this:

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect.

 

They respond negatively within the time period. IMHO, you are justified in sending the LBA following their reply, since they could still be reflecting AFTER the LBA has been sent.

 

You are not starting action yet - just entering dialogue. Letters can overlap in that period. In fact, I would go so far as to say you are being courteous by responding promptly ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone. i feel very reassured. I think that i should stick to what was stated in my letter and not be swayed. therfore will wait the for the 14 days are up before sending LBA letter.

will keep you posted.

karen

:rolleyes:

 

timeline:

prelim letter to lloyds sent 14th may. claim for £1190

first " we are forwarding to someone else" reply on 16th May

second "really sod off" reply on 17th may

lba to be sent on 28:rolleyes:th may

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen

 

I'm a couple of days behind you & can't wait to get onto the next stage with the LBA.

 

But like you I've decided to wait till the 14 days are up.

 

Good Luck!!

 

Karen

FIRST DIRECT: £4751.86 SETTLED IN FULL 5/07/06 :-)

 

TESCO VISA CARD: £90 SETTLED IN FULL 12/08/06 :)

 

LLOYDS TSB: £4403.59 SETTLED IN FULL 17/08/06 :)

EGG: £451.52 SETTLED IN FULL 18/01/07 :)

 

 

Opinions and advice of kazzaw are independent, offered informally, without prejudice, without liability, and not endorsed by the Bank Action Group. If in any doubt, seek the advice of a qualified, insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

I am filling in my claim form for Lloyds on moneyclaim, but am confused over what to fill in in the interest part. I have copied the section on claiming my right to the 8% interest from the date of the charge, then it continues " and from this date to the date of judgement at a daily interest rate of..." what do i put in here? (I did not leave in the section on claiming interest charges back in my letters as i felt it was too complicated to calculate.) Please help! Hopefully nearly there!

Karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Total Claim Amount (excluding Court costs etc) x 0.00022 = daily rate

  • Haha 1

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

its been a long time since i last posted... everything went quiet, i sent the claim off, it was acknowledged and Lloyds said they'd defend.

Today i had through a letter from the court with an allocation questionnaire and the defence from LLoyds, 9 points of defence, signed Alan Ingledew, recoveries Team Leader. Is this what everyone else has found?

My questions about the questionnaire are:

Do i need witnesses?

Do i need an experts report?

An has anyone written anything in the "other information" box?

Appreciate any advice as Im pretty scared to read their defence. Do i need to get anything else together ready other than all the statements and letters etc?

Thanks in advance

Karen:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Ingle fellow was busy, you are the 4th person (me being one) today who have received the AQ and defence from him. Just looking myself and found guidance on the AQ in the Bank Templates Library.

 

Still looking myself for the evidence and cases to mention, but time on our hands for now as I assume your date for reply is 25th Jult too?

 

Good luck be watching and supporting.

Steve

Slightly disgruntled but getting happier as LTSB squirm!!

steve1145 v lloyds-tsb

Data Protection Act done

LBA done

Claim issued 5/6/06 - 6QZ35417

Reply due by 24th June

Responded so further 14 days now 8th July

Defence filed 6th July ......bah humbug!!!!!!!

AQ and defence received on 7th July

AQ filed 21/7/06 12.30pm

Court date set for 16/10/06 - D DAY

***** Settlement Paid 12/10/06 Nearly the whole amount *****:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Steve,

i found the library notes and i have completed the form. Wondering now if it is worth calling the defence solicitors, looking at some other threads, this has speeded up teh refunding, offer them the option of not paying teh court fee?

Is anyone going to do this?

I ahve had no telephone contact with tehbank through this process and am happy to not start now, however, anything that makes this move quicker must be a good thing!!

Karen

Moderated : threads merged , please keep to your original thread ,thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoning the solicitors is not recommended by CAG.Following the step by step guide is.

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...