Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just starting out on the long MBNA road :(


choppers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5245 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi again.

 

I have also atarted getting phone calls from a number 01706713200

 

after googling the number it is a company called BMS they seem to be tied in with 3 mobile some how but also when i typed in BMS debt collectors and i believe they are an arm of GVI.

 

anyone got any help to my previous query?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it 14 days now from the date they should have received the CCA request? If so, they are now in default with you. There should be a letter somewhere on the forums about this, at the same time you can re-iterate the telephone harrasment part.

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i sent off my CCA and S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on the 9th August and have received nothing (other than 5 phone calls a day still:mad: ) until today.

 

received a letter from MBNA informing me that i am in breach of the agreed T's &C's and a decision has been made to place a restriction on my account (this is irrelevant as i had already told them to freeze my account)

 

they go on to say that failure to clear my arrears will result in eventual termination of the agreement and registration of a default at the CRA's

 

Can anyone tell me the ramifications of this letter and what it means to the CCA and S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)?

 

thanks for any help

 

 

any help on the above would be welcome, i appreciate that every case is different, but any one who has had a similar experience or knows someone going through this would be welcome to comment :D

 

 

standingupformyself: Is it 14 days now from the date they should have received the CCA request? If so, they are now in default with you. There should be a letter somewhere on the forums about this, at the same time you can re-iterate the telephone harrasment part.

 

it has been 14 days, but i am wondering if they will say, sorry you were in default at the time the CCA SAR were received?

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I makes no difference at all. I am at work at the moment, so unable to spend time trawling through the forums to help you find a letter, but I think there is a template for defaulting on a CCA somewhere...... PM Josie8 who I see has added to your thread earlier on, she is very clued up and switched on about CCA's and I am sure will be able to help you...

I will log back on later today and hopefully will have the letter templates if you have not got them sorted out by that point. xx

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi, things have not gone well with MBNA and i have sent the a letter informing them that i will have to file for Bankruptcy unless they accpet my latest offer of token payments, and freeze interest (an unlikely event)

 

any way i received a letter from them stating

"As a final attempt to demonstrate our good faith to resolve this matter, MBNA is offering you one last opportunity to pay. MBNA will accept a singificantly reduced payment based on your circumstances in partial settlement of your outstanding balnace."

 

and later goes on to state

"Remember we will forgo a significant proportion of your balnace if you agree to settle this account"

 

just a couple of queries about this;

 

what do they call a significant amount?

and will the be the end of it, or does "partial settlement" just mean i will still owe them.

 

does anyone know of this situation?

 

just wanted to check before contacting them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Choppers, i've just quickly skimmed through your thread again.

 

Before you consider bankruptcy, you need to remember that MBNA are in summary criminal default now - they have not supplied you with an agreement, therefore they cannot legally chase you for this debt.

 

The reason they keep trying to barter with you and offer you reduced settlements is because they haven't got an agreement. They know, that some form of payment is better than nothing.

 

It doesn't matter that you had missed payments when you sent your request. The time limits for CCA requests are lawful timescales.

 

Sit tight, more help will come.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While MBNA are in default of your s.78 request they are not allowed to enforce the account. That means they can't charge interest, demand payments, default you etc. This fact won't stop them from carrying out a programme of harrassment and intimidation.

 

However there is nothing in reality apart from trash your credit file they can lawfully do to recover any money from you.

 

When did you originally open your account with them? Was it MBNA or another provider that they took over?

 

At the moment there is no reason to file for bankruptcy etc. It is likely they will not be able to produce any enforceable agreement in which case you legally owe them nothing.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have found this thread as a consequence of being in the same boat as choppers. I was made redundant about 2 months ago, and have finally run out of money. I have defaulted on an MBNA payment by about 3 weeks, and have just started receiving calls (many of them) from GV. I think I took my MBNA CC out about 2007. Now I would not normally consider this if they had been more reasonable, but do agreements taken out only a few years ago have a chance of being unenforcable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Please please someone respond with advice.

 

I recently offered MBNA a payment of around £35 a month, as this is genuinely all I can afford. The first person I spoke to said that that was fine and they would set up an agreement based on that for a short period, but then someone called a day later and said they wouldn't set up an agreement, unless I make a payment immediately. I said I couldn't pay the first amount until the end of the month, and they said they would need to see commitment of at least 2 payments over the next 2 months.

 

Anyway, I got paid from work early as it's Xmas. So I called MBNA, but the guy was really unhelpful. He took the payment, then said according to my credit file I had a loan that was up to date, and that they couldn't set up an agreement for the lower fee, as I was up date with this other loan, and that showed I was giving preferential treatment.

 

Now it's true, I have managed to keep up with a few debts that are tied in with my bank/account, as I figured it's better to have 1 or 2 defaults rather than 3 or 4?

 

Anyway the guy says they won't set up a reduced payment option for me, and that I would have to have one in place on my bank loan as well. He said that they will sell the debt to a DCA in the new year, who will take me to court.

 

Now please, I'm begging here, can someone please please advise me?!

 

P.S. I took a big (around 9k) pay cut last year, that's how all this happened. I'm desperately trying to find a better job, how can I hold them off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...