Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant as an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Realist v Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6197 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is it within the number of characters limit?

 

Post exactly how it is now on here please. (Excluding personal details of course).

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the exact text (Without the interest bit)

 

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years plus the

interest they have levied on those charges,

totaling £1446.13 inclusive of interest. The

bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so.

 

Above = 20 lins.

 

Here is the above with the interest bit.

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years plus the

interest they have levied on those charges,

totaling £1446.13 inclusive of interest. The

bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so.

The claimant claims interest under section

69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxx of

£xxxxx and also interest at the same rate

up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of 0.00022%.

 

As you can see its over by 2 lines, the maximum is 24.

 

Laters

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years plus the

interest they have levied on those charges,

totaling £1446.13 inclusive of interest. The

bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so.

The claimant claims interest under section

69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxx of

£xxxxx and also interest at the same rate

up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of 0.00022%.

 

Take out the text in red - hopefully that should do it.

 

Also, daily rate of interest needs to be a monetary amount, not a percentage. (And it's actually 0.022% anyway)

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would I calculate the daily interest on £1446.13?

 

Trying text now.

 

Take out the text in red - hopefully that should do it.

 

Also, daily rate of interest needs to be a monetary amount, not a percentage. (And it's actually 0.022% anyway)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get the total claim amount excluding interest and court fees, and work out 0.22% of that.

 

So basically: claim amount x 0.00022 = daily rate of interest

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My particulars now read as:

 

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years. The bank's

charges are a disproportionate penalty and

therefore unenforceable as they are contrary

to common law. Further, they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so. The

claimant claims interest under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8%

a year from 31/12/02 to 05/07/06 of £236.13

and also interest at the same rate up to the

date of judgment or earlier payment at a

daily rate of 0.2662.

 

Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Change daily rate of interest to £0.27 and that's it you're done!

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changed it bit, is this ok providing it fits :)

 

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years of £1210.00.

The bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, they

are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts)

Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair

Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations

1999. Para.8 and sch.2 (1)(e). In the event

that the charges are not a penalty then they

are unreasonable within the meaning of the

Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

I have repeatedly asked the bank to justify

their charges but they have declined to do

so. The claimant claims interest under

section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at

the rate of 8% a year from 31/12/02 to

05/07/06 of £236.13 and also interest at the

same rate up to the date of judgment or

earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.27.

 

Laters

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a contract with the Halifax Plc which

is conducted on their standard terms and

conditions. I am claiming the return of

money taken by the defendant in the way of

charges over the last 4 years excluding

interest of £1210.00. The bank's charges are

a disproportionate penalty and therefore

unenforceable as they are contrary to

common law. Further, they are invalid under

the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4

and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so. The

claimant claims interest under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8%

a year from 31/12/02 to 05/07/06 of £236.13

and also interest at the same rate up to the

date of judgment or earlier payment at a

daily rate of £0.27.

 

Leave out the red text - it's confusing, and all you need to do is make sure you put the total amount including interest in the relevant box on moneyclaim.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just added to to show the initial amount without interest because the actual interest inself is listed at the bottom.

 

So adding the 2 figures gives me my full claim amount.

 

But I removed it anyway.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah there isn't any need for it though. And also when you say "excluding interest" it sort of gives the impression you aren't claiming for interest, but you then go on to say you are. As long as you have the total amount in the amount claimed box, and show in the particulars of claim what amount of that is interest that is perfectly fine.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update number 3,000 :)

 

Received this from Helifax

 

Halifax.JPG

 

You can tell this is a standard automated letter because it says 6 years and I have only had my account for 4 years and 4 years was stated on the phone and all letters.

 

Laters

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filed my moneyclaim and this morning I see this on my screen:

 

Do you wish to enter Judgment by Default or by Admission? Please select one of the options below:

 

spacer.gif The defendant has not filed an admission or defence to my claim

(Judgment by Default)

spacer.gif

You will need to decide, how and when you want the defendant to pay. You can ask for the Judgment to be paid by instalment or in one payment.

 

spacer.gif The defendant admits that all the money is owed

(Judgment by Admission)

spacer.gif

If the defendant has given a new address on the form of admission to which correspondence should be sent, update the defendant's details within the following Judgment request.

spacer.gif

 

Which one do I click?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which one do I click?

 

None of them.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do nothing on that page.

 

Go back a step - it says "Do you wish to enter Judgment by Default or by Admission?" You don't. So don't click it.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6197 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...