Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Scot needs help!


Alpha
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with T4ff endorsement of Seahorses idea and can't, in my naive opinion, see how it has any flaws. This would be an inventive way to speed up our process north of the border:mad: . Just out of a matter of interest, has anybody had a FOS ruling in their favour recently? Got excited about possiblity of 6 years worth of claims but not to worry something better than nothing!!:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

T4FF, Alpha & Seahorse, OK some variation of this MAY be a direction to think about going, but contact with FOS might be best for advise. Another thought on this, if prelim and are SAR combined and bank takes 40 days to provide statements, allowing 2 days for calculating and posting. The first letter sent would have to be the 14 day LBA, taking you up to 8 weeks. Surely the banks would respond to FOS complaint as insufficient time to process claim.

05/03/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) handed in at branch

Found missing statements at home !!!!

08/03/07 Prelim+ schedule posted rec del

22/03/07 :mad: No reply to prelim LBA posted rec del

05/04/07 :mad: 14 days and no reply to LBA, sent e-mail

27/04/07 :D Offered FULL SETTLEMENT £3375

03/05/07 Cash in bank account :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all. i'm reclaiming my parents charges for them from rbs and it's ~£2,000. I live in scotland but am claiming thru english system and using Natwest's HQ address in England as that's where i got the statements from. got the idea when i complained to RBS in Edinburgh and got a reply from Natwest, i queried this and was told that Natwest took over RBS. My prelim and LBA went to Natwest and they replied with standard letter, so I will be issuing court claim there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats quite an interesting idea.

05/03/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) handed in at branch

Found missing statements at home !!!!

08/03/07 Prelim+ schedule posted rec del

22/03/07 :mad: No reply to prelim LBA posted rec del

05/04/07 :mad: 14 days and no reply to LBA, sent e-mail

27/04/07 :D Offered FULL SETTLEMENT £3375

03/05/07 Cash in bank account :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just send a covering letter with claim (this one is from my claim against BoS)

"I reside in Scotland butit is my understanding that The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, as amended by the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Order 2001 applies to this case. In particular, Schedule 4 paragraph 8 of the 1982 Act (as amended) provides that as a consumer, I can raise proceedings where the company is domiciled, in this case England is where BOS, HBOS registered head office is seated and this is where I have directed and received all my previous correspondence regarding this matter.

 

Furthermore, it is my understanding that there is no clause in the terms and conditions with my contract with HBOS that confers exclusive jurisdiction.

 

In addition, if it is the case that exclusive jurisdiction applies; it is my position that this clause is an unfair term of contract in terms of UTCC Regulations 1999. Specifically paragraph 1(q) of Schedule 2"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree - I think aproach head office. The branch is a waste of time and is simply drawing out a process un-necessarily - especially as everything gets handled by head office anyway and all the branch do is forward everything onto head office in internal mail anyway....

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a matter of protocol. You log a complaint at branch level first of all. (Yes, I KNOW they don't have the authority to refund any charges above about £50, in the case of RBS). They tell you sorry, can't help. In some cases, they may refer the matter upwards anyway. But if not? Your next stage is escalation to Head Office, which will be by way of your SAR. Pretty much 4 weeks will have likely passed by then, letting you give them a further 2 + 2 weeks by way of your prelim and LBA.

 

The whole point being to maintain an air of professionalism throughout the whole process. Not to just go blundering in shouting the odds from the word go.

 

I think I've pretty much made my thoughts clear regarding this, so no more debate from me. I'll pop back in a day or 2 once I have finalised some drafts. Then it's up to everyone as individuals as to whether they take it on board or go their own way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seahorse; One does not need to go and shout the odds. But why waste time going to the branch you are only dealing with underlings even at headquarters you could still be dealing with underlings but you at least are saving time and also the banks time. The one time I dealt with the branch (CITI) I have ended up with all time wasters saying They had never received the papers even though I have signed receipts of recorded dely three in fact. Started back in Nov. Still not finished. Ended up with new case from Head office. So Don't tell me about protocal

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is, you have all the time in the world. Well, 8 weeks anyway. Whether you approach head office or your local branch, you NEED to get that 8 week period started as SOON as possible. If you do it by way of adding it in with your SAR, logging it down at your local branch or whatever, it has to be done as early as you can. This is the point I'm trying to make.

 

And it doesn't matter what sort of runaround you've had. IMHO, you should always maintain the moral high ground. And all their nonsense about not receiving paperwork is so much bollix, and rather irrelevant. 8 weeks into your complaint, the FOS WILL take your complaint on board, irrespective of your bank's delaying tactics. So they can obstruct and plead ignorance all they want, it will not affect your claim process one jot. They make think they're being clever, but in the end, it boils down to the fact that they will have used up their own timescale, and will then have the FOS to deal with.

 

I'm confused at the reasons for a new case being required though. Had this happened with me, I'd have simply waited out the 8 weeks, then written to tell them that a compliant was in the post to the FOS based on your original first complaint. After all, you do have proof by way of your signed receipts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seahorse; I did not have any option it was the court who decided when they heard from headoffice to give CITI a new trial as the first one they did not turnup so lost be default and when the bailiffs sent the Extract for payment to the original branch which was Sunderland on hearing nothing back, and not having jurisdiction south of the border sent a new set of papers to Dundee branch and they sent it to head office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you've missed the point of where we're at then Texel. What we're trying to do is open up a simpler avenue for those who don't really have the option of going to court except as a very last resort because their claims are likely to take them into Ordinary Cause.

 

For folks with claims at, or likely to be, under £1500, I think the best course of action is still to follow the advice as per this forum, as court IS a realistic option in that case. Although even then, using the FOS should still be considered a viable alternative, as this will show the court that a reasonable attempt has been made to avoid using the courts and thereby wasting their time, should it get that far.

 

I hope this clears up a bit of confusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think it makes a blind bit of difference WHERE it goes so long as it gets there. The key is starting your complaint at the time of the SAR. It doesn't matter if it goes to your branch, head office, or my branch so long as it gets there.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

seahorse my chum was down today with her letter from the ombudsman and it says on it she is going back 6 years with the RBS. I know the other post said they phoned them and they said scotland is 5 years so I dont know whats right and Im sorry if I have caused any confusion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rae May - it's late and I'm online too.....

 

Simply put - Scotland: 5 years, England and Wales: 6 years

 

The above only relates the the Limitation Act (i.e. how far back you can go)

 

As for *Small Claims* legal action: Scotland max claim is £750, England and Wales: £5000. However anything over those two amounts then if your claim isn't settled in preliminary correspondence with the bank it'll more than likely have to go to proper court. The good news is that the banks *cannot* allow a test case to go through - so you'll almost guaranteed to get your money before a formal court date is set....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rae May - just a thought but you're hijacking Alpha's thread....... so could be good idea if you start a thread of your own as no doubt you'll ahve a tonne of correspondence and advice to give/ receive from all of us.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

no I posted a reply page 2 of Alphas thread seahorse answered me and I was answering him back and I thought this is what I was doing please tell me if I put this in the wrong place and also I have my own threads

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a bit of an update - received "investigating your complaint letter" yesterday. LBA due to go in on Monday, getting drafted up now. We'll see what the next few weeks bring!!:rolleyes::razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you got a reply Alpha, it would appear many people dont. Just hang in there and it will work out. If you dont receive anything by about the 7th week from date of prelim, then phone and e-mail them. ;)

05/03/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) handed in at branch

Found missing statements at home !!!!

08/03/07 Prelim+ schedule posted rec del

22/03/07 :mad: No reply to prelim LBA posted rec del

05/04/07 :mad: 14 days and no reply to LBA, sent e-mail

27/04/07 :D Offered FULL SETTLEMENT £3375

03/05/07 Cash in bank account :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just thought I would give a quick update.

 

14 day deadline on LBA expired today. Sent e-mail to Sandy Watt querying current position, got standard e-mail back "will reply within FOS timescales....." So looks like, as I'm in Scotland and claiming for approx 5.5K, I'll just have to play the waiting game until 8 weeks are up, then contact FOS.

 

Better delay booking that holiday, just in case!!!!!!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, guess what came through the letter box this morning? Letter from RBS, although they do not agree with my complaint will put just over £5,500 into my bank account as a gesture of goodwill!!!!! WHOO HOO!!!!!!!!!! Maybe I was a bit cheeky, but I'd had other charges since I started the complaint so I phd up to query refund of those. The very helpful person on the phone advised I should write back accepting offer but put a covering letter detailing the new charges and they "have been refunding those as well" I'm SO happy - things like this normally happen to other people, it's good to be on the receiving end for a change!!!:D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked bank a/c today and the money is THERE!!! plus the additional charges I had incurred which I added on to my acceptance letter:D :o :D

 

So it's worthwhile hanging in there!!!!!!!

 

Could a mod move my thread to the won section (I've been soooooo looking forward to writing that!!!)

 

Thanks again for all the help - I'll move on to the next one now I know it can work!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...