Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite usual for couriers to swap parcel contents, though it could have been done by someone at the 1st address before it got to where it should have .... ebay. just to clarify as you seem to be not understanding/reading some posts correctly.   you should always ignore a dca totally unless you ever get a letter of claim in the post. you never ever ring a DCA.. they LIE. no!! no!! they dont own the debt, their txt says our client ebay. only the OWNER of a debt can take you to court. and ebay dont do court. i find it quite amazing that you have numerous threads about ebay/paypal regarding issues since you joined in 2011 but have never read any of the advice previously given. dx    
    • so where are the one with this HMTL link? and when were they sent.? pdf's merged and properly named. dx  
    • Hi Just had a wee look at your PDF and nothing really to add. Now as for the Court Fees if these are in there Claim then that is for the Judge to decide whether they accept the recovery of Court Fees in the Claim. If recovery of Court Fees are not in the Claim and they try to recover these via your deposit then you dispute this with the Tenancy deposit scheme your deposit is protected in and point out these costs should have been in there Court Claim which they failed to do and is there error.  
    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

please help.... ruthbridge limited


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

 

i have no idea what to do i recieved a letter this morning off the above people telling me they are retreving the balance of £1795.36 from some time in 2002 and that tey want the balance in full, i tried ringing them and the peson i had to speak to is in a meeting, im unemployed and worried can they demand the balance in full? i have not long moved in with my fiancee and im so scared of him finding out what will i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

i have no idea what to do i recieved a letter this morning off the above people telling me they are retreving the balance of £1795.36 from some time in 2002 and that tey want the balance in full, i tried ringing them and the peson i had to speak to is in a meeting, im unemployed and worried can they demand the balance in full? i have not long moved in with my fiancee and im so scared of him finding out what will i do?

 

You have posted in Baliffs Ruthbridge are not a baliff just a Debt Collector - Ihave moved you to dca forum

Don't ring again, and I hope you haven't left your phone no with them. Do you recognise this debt?

As you are on benefits they aren't going to be able to get a lot off you.

I would send them a CCA and SAR request if you can afford it to see what the situation is with the balance.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

i have no idea what to do i recieved a letter this morning off the above people telling me they are retreving the balance of £1795.36 from some time in 2002 and that tey want the balance in full, i tried ringing them and the peson i had to speak to is in a meeting, im unemployed and worried can they demand the balance in full? i have not long moved in with my fiancee and im so scared of him finding out what will i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Don't phone them, whatever you do.

 

Write to them, using letter template N from the library, to request a copy of your CCA.

 

Ensure you include I do not acknowledge any debt in your letter.

 

You must enclose the £1 fee, but make it clear that this is not to be put aside any alleged debt.

 

Send it recorded delivery (costs £1.04), and then wait. They've got 12 working days from receipt to send you the documents, after which the debt becomes unenforcable until such time as they do comply. After a further month they commit an offence.

 

If they do send you anything, give as many details as you can on this thread and we'll take it from there.

 

If it turns out the debt is legit, then only pay them what you can genuinely afford, even if that's £1 per month. But we'll cross that bridge when, and if, we come to it.

 

As for telling your fiance, that's your call. But in my personal experience hiding money problems from your partner only leads to more problems down the road.

 

Edit: in fact, you might be best off telling him everything. In the unlikely event they phone or call at your house, it's better that he knows the score so as not to accidently drop you in it!

 

Don't worry about being judged on here, that's not what this forum's all about. :)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kitty,

 

You haven't said whether you believe the debt to be correct.

 

Did you have credit pre-2002 which is what they are trying to collect or do you have no idea what this debt relates to?

 

If you did take out credit it would be useful to know what the credit was for, as well as if you have made any payments since 2002 or had contact with the creditor.

 

This info may be useful because if the debt is for you then you are approaching the time when the debt will become Statute Barred under the Limitations Act, possibly within 12 months if the debt hasnt been acknowledged since 2002.

 

It is vital that any letters you send to the creditor include the statement "I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT", otherwise you risk resetting the time under the Limitations Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly did Ruthbridge threaten you with? Was it in the form of a letter or phone call?

 

They're debt collectors, and have as much legal power as the guy who puts takeaway menus through your letterbox. If they've misrepresented themselves, implying they have powers which they clearly don't, that's a big breach of OFT guidelines and should be reported.

 

In the highly unlikely event that they do turn up, as tomterm8 says don't accept anything from them, and politely but firmly ask them to leave - through a letterbox or window if needbe.

 

Also keep in mind that if they act in a way likely to cause embarrassment (eg talking to your neighbours) that's also a big no-no!

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't turn up (it costs them £100, and they can't get it back). If they do, they have no legal powers, don't accept any paper work, don't acknowledge who you are, and order them off your property THREE times, your voice getting louder each time. If they refuse, call the police and tell them someone is tresspassing.

 

what costs £100?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they sent me a letter through the post addressed "to the occupier" didnt say who they were but it was an express delivery and to phone them urgently.... im actually expecting something from america and thought it could bethat so i phoned and they stated who theywere and named the vender as LO and then arranged today to come out to me to serve papers.... ive stayed in all day and they never came suprise suprise... im so scared incase they come into my home the person on the phone said when asked will they want into my house said probably not but i couldnt rule it out!!!! ive told my fiancee alll about it but this is so not fair on him.... can they come into my property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shall we count how many OFT guidelines they've broken?!

 

Did you send them the CCA request? If so, you've put the debt into dispute and they should not be taking any collection action.

 

That notwithstanding, they're a debt collector, not a baliff. They've got absolutely no more right of entry than a double-glazing salesman. The fact that they're trying to make you believe otherwise is shocking and should be reported to the OFT.

 

Sending cards addressed "to the occupier" is a breach of best practice, as is not making it clear who it was from.

 

They're talking absolute and from what I can see succeeding in making you frightened. You're stronger than that, and the fact that you're here asking questions shows you won't be bullied.

 

You should search for the Harrassment template letters and have nothing more to do with them until such time as they respond to your CCA request - and even then only if they have complied properly.

 

Please keep posting if you need any support in dealing with these jokers.

 

:)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kitty they do not even have your name they have addressed it to the occupier. They cannot come into your house, that much I have learnt. Only court balifs can enter your house. Do not accept anything off of them at all, do not even open the door would be my advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a look at their nice slick website with all their fluffy customer pledges and quotes of the day.

 

Then have a read of this thread to see how they really treat their customers:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/74305-ruthbridge-ltd.html

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...