Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Forteboy Vs Capital 1


forteboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The directions hearing is to decide which track to allocate the claim to and to make any directions to you or Cap1.

 

Your claim for CCi does have a legal basis - there is case law - the Sempra Metals v Inland revenue case.

 

The bit about a very small part of the interest being charged on fees is probably correct - but as you have no access to the algorythm they use you have to guess what that might be. THat hsould be what you have claimed.

 

"this is not a situation wher the bank has had the benefit of the use of your money" what else have they done with it, put it under the bed? :rolleyes: The money you paid them in charges (ansd the interest thereon) has been leant to otehr people at interest. If the charges are unlawful, then the money they have made is unjust enrichment. What else can it be?

 

"their actual losses exceed £12" - complete balloney. If they maintain this, then they should prove it by giving an account of their cost base. If their losses are anywhere near £12 (or even £1 come to that) then they would be so uncompetitive they would go bust.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you Steven,

 

pretty much what I thought, a letter issued to intimidate rather than assist in settling the claim. Back to the direction hearing, do I really need to attend and if so is there anything I need to prepare and take with me, will cap 1 turn up.

 

Many thanks

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should attend if you can. Otherwise a letter to the court explaining why it should be allocated to SCT and perhaps a bit about CCI and Sempra to inform the court as the case is still quite new. You could also take/send any draft directions you think tthe court ought to order. For example, something based on the 'new' AQ - directions to disclose cost structure, etc. Maybe a draft order to strike out the defence as abuse of process.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Has any one already composed a letter to the judge, similar to what steven, above has stated. It will be difficult to attend for me as my job is now around 26 miles from the court rather than the 500 yards it was before i was made redundent. If any one has a real good letter i would like to send to Cap 1 as well, to put the fear of god in them, let them know i mean business and with everyones help off this site finally get my money with the interest i am intitled to.

 

Many thanks

 

Forteboy:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Baslow,

 

They offered most of what i wanted with the exception of Default removal, due to them being a responsible lender and they reckon they they were not unjustly rewarded by my money and so therefore will only offer 8% from when my card was closed and not the 34% they charge mugs like us to use their cards, which by the way was backed by money taken from unwitting customers. I was advised to keep the claim intact if i wanted default removal and all of my cash returned.

 

Hope that helps

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was advised to keep the claim intact if i wanted default removal and all of my cash returned.
And that's good advice. Experience shows that trying to get defaults removed or interest paid once the charges have been repaid is very difficult.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I think i should change my name to "Idiotboy", I booked half a days holiday on Wednesday and duly turned up at 11am at the court ready for 11.10 start. The problem started then they could not find my claim on the running list, i checked my letter and oh what a surprise the hearing was to be Thursday, the next day, and unfortunately i could not make it. I handed the draft order for directions, and the witness statement along with a mention of the sempra metals case.

 

Now its waiting to see what the judge has ordered, hopefully all in my favour.

 

Merry Christmas

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

 

Thanks for the moral support, could you advise if the semplar metals issue, is also applicable to current Credit cards as well, reading the case i would have thought so but need to understand it better, if there is an explanation of this could you please advise.

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It applies to all cases - the problem was that, up until recently only simple interest could be awarded in compensation. This was challenged in another case (Westdeutsche v Islingtin BC) on the grounds that, in this day and age, simple interest was nonesense - no one borrows or lends money with simple interest. The argument was lost excpet that the minority view was that compound interest was right. The majority veiw was that CI could only be awarded in cases involving fraud or breach of trust.

 

Where Sempra comes in is that the House of Lords upheld the minority opinion in westdeutsche - that CI could be awarded in cases even when there was no fraud or breach of trust. Sempra gives authority for claiming CI in all cases where money has been taken (or kept) unlawfully, although you have to be a bit careful about the grounds on which CI is being claimed. The main grounds are those of unjust enrichment by the bank and restitution - ie putting them back where they would have been had they not unlawfully taken your money..

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if this has yet been tested in court on CC as potentially have over 4000 pounds in CI on my one credit card and if i could get this back then great, and to be honest its with the big american bank who have caused major issues with the Credit cruch, so I would really love to put my little boot in to them as well. always kick the bank when their down, because they will surely do it to you if the boot was on the other foot

 

Forteboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has never been tested in court for CC claims for the simple reason that none of the banks will actually let us take them to court. They always settle beforehand (even if it's only minutes beforehand).

 

My only warning is that you must not let the CI claim get separated form the charges claim by accepting payment of the charges alone. There was one case that went to court for CI that was lost. A county court awarded the charges but not the CI. The claimant lodged an appeal with the High Court and lost. This was for two reasons:

 

1) the appeal was ony for the interest (however, so was Sempra)

 

2) (much) more improtantly, the grounds for claiming CI were flawed (the claim was on the grounds of reciprocity and mutuality - which, of course, was why the county court didn't award it). You can read the whole story here plus a lot of the discussion that has gone into our current understanding of the right grounds for claiming CI.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Evening All

 

Its been 6 days since i submitted my requests at the Directional hearing, will I be advised if the judge grants my request for full disclosure and if so any ideas of how long before i know.

 

Many thanks

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys,spoke to the court yesterday, they advised the claim was in the pile to be typed and would be completed next week, they could not advise what the outcome would be, hopefully full disclosure and evidence to be presented by mid january.Happy New Year.Forteboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year fortebot.

 

I went to mey local court yesterday and they were shut. They had a notice on the door "Closed until Tuesday 2nd January" - do they know something we don't :rolleyes:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good evening all,

 

it has been over a month since the hearing, i have chased the court 3 times now, but they can not or will not tell me what the current situation with my claim is. I received a letter from Cap 1 on Friday stating i have a credit balance on my account and they are sending a cheque to clear it. Strangely the value of the cheque they are sending matches the one i returned in December as not sufficient to settle the claim, so they will be waisting their time and energy, i want CI and Default removed or I will see them in court with everyones help.

 

Many thanks

 

Forteboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steven, I will do,

 

thanks for all your assistance to date and hopefully you will be around if or when it goes to court as i will definately need help with the CI and default removal to present the arguements correctly to the judge

 

Regards

 

Forteboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening all,

 

well today i have received my "notice of allocation to the small track hearing", it will be with DJ Morton on the 26th march 2008.

 

Now the letter states i have to pay 300 pounds by the 2nd February as a hearing fee, now when I win I assume I can claim this back? the good news is that the court want all relevent documents that I will be going to use during the hearing to be sent to the court and Cap 1 by 29th February.

 

Now I will need some help with the court bundle as I have never had to put one together and also will need special help with the section for Default removal and the CI arguement, so as you can see not a lot really.

 

I know I can count on the people of this great website, and once i have beaten cap 1 i will be able to afford to go after my other 2 cards and the Shabbey as well.

 

I now can begin to see the woods for the trees

 

Regards

 

Forteboy:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

still waiting on the courts to see if i am lucky enough not to need to pay the $300 for the hearing. just a quick question I believe the standard court bundle covers the general claims, however I will need help/advise on3 more aspects, claiming on charges more than 6 years old, Default removal and probably the most intense is the CI bit, if any one can help, please feel free to jump in, I Know its not due to the end of Feb, but i really would like this to be completed sooner rather than later and it would give me chance to prepare thoroughly for the case hearing.

 

Many thanks

 

Forteboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...