Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boy shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in abut also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPMAN v Nasty Vest Help Needed re Form N244


PPMAN159
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Scott

 

The reason why I am doing is is given in my posts 16 and 19.

 

Basically I think that what Cobbetts are saying is that I have not given enough detail on my original MCOL application.

 

The daft thing is that I had an offer from Nat West last week for the charges in full but I sent it back saying that I would only accept it as partial settlement and would still proceed with my claim.

 

Then a day later I received the letter from Cobbets as detailed in 16.

 

Also as the case is being defended, it it being transferred to court nearer to me in Kent.

 

As such I am now kicking myself for not accepting the offer made by Nat West and am confused as to what I need to in order to proceed with the claim to the satisfaction in order that it does not get thrown out.

 

Thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

follow the instructions ive given u and u will be fine

 

they will not defend in court as long as you use the correct POC and the court will not throw the case out

 

MCOL always transfer u to a court closer to your home so this is totally normal

 

give the court a ring they will tell u exactly what to do

 

dont worry this is fairly common

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scotty

 

I think that I have got confused having received letters from the court and Cobbetts in recent days.

 

At the end of last week I received from the court a letter stating that I need to amend the Particulars of the Claim in Part A(2) of the NI244 form along with submitting a new N1 form detailing the new amounts in red.This should be sent back to them along with my cheque for £35.

 

Then I received the letter from Cobbetts detailed above.

 

Hence the confusion.

 

So once and for all to clarify.

 

All I need to do is to send the court three coipies of the completed N244 form and three copies of my charging scheduel and this will be ok?Will they need a cheque for £35.

 

Sorry for the questions-I must come accross as a complete idiot but need to have things 100% in my mind so that can carry on with confidence.

 

Many thanks

 

PP

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ppman

 

You got it

 

Just ring the court to confirm or pop it into the court and speak to them.....(they r really helpful) better to be 100% sure...

 

Please check b4 u send in the post as u dont want to make a silly mistake as youre so close to getting your money back

 

Be strong u will win

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPman

 

I amended MY N1 all i did was complete the N244 and attached the new POC (Seperate sheet of paper 3 copies all in RED INK)

 

The changes on the original N1 you cross through with a Black pen

3 Copies also required

 

I did not have to complete another N1

 

Hope this clarifies things

 

Scott

 

I completely missed this thread as I have been out and about today.

 

I am happy with the N244 form but what is POC-is this my charges schedule?

 

If so I will print three in red and attach it to three copies of the N244.

 

I assume that the change in red is the interest that I am claiming that was not detailed on the original N1 submission?

 

The only thing that I think that I need to change on the NI form is the paragraph that I have added to do with the interest originally claimed-so I will cross this through and send three copies back

 

My main concern was the phrase used by Cobbetts in the defence letter to the effect that they were 'embaraased by the lack of particularity pleaded in the particulars of claim to the extent that the particulars of claim fail to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the defendant'

 

That is why I was going to complete a new N1 with new wording.

 

See I told you I was stupid!!

 

PP

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely missed this thread as I have been out and about today.

 

I am happy with the N244 form but what is POC-is this my charges schedule? Particulars of claim

 

If so I will print three in red and attach it to three copies of the N244.

Thats correct

I assume that the change in red is the interest that I am claiming that was not detailed on the original N1 submission? re submit the whole POC with the interest see template library

 

The only thing that I think that I need to change on the NI form is the paragraph that I have added to do with the interest originally claimed-so I will cross this through and send three copies back Cross it all through and insert POC from library

 

My main concern was the phrase used by Cobbetts in the defence letter to the effect that they were 'embaraased by the lack of particularity pleaded in the particulars of claim to the extent that the particulars of claim fail to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the defendant' Your POC was to brief so use the POC from the library

 

That is why I was going to complete a new N1 with new wording.

The new wording is the POC

See I told you I was stupid!!

 

u r not stupid just confused

PP

 

 

If u dont understand please tell me we WILL sort it out

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have printed all of your replies and will go through them tonight.

 

Thanks for confirming the POC details and I have taken the wording from the templates library-how do I show this to the court?Do I do a letter for the POC or does it need to be added to the N1 form?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a further letter from Nasty Vest offerring me slightly more than their previous offer so I think that I will accept this.

 

Many thanks to everyone who has given me help and support over recent weeks and good luck in your claims.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey PPMAN......... CONGRATULATIONS!!!!......... a well deserved win for you - enjoy every penny of the cash!! Well done, hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey PPPMAN. Well done............ so long as you are happy with the deal, then the jobs complete. WELL DONE, IM CHUFFED AS A DOG WITH TWO TAILS FOR YA MATE.

 

FENDY XXX ALL THE BEST. ENJOY THE SPONDOOLIES................ BIG YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY FOR PPPMAN. xxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys and one last point.

 

In their letter they say that they will credit the money direct to my Nasty Vest account.

 

Can I ask that they send me a cheque or do they have to pay the funds direct?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPman well done and CONGRATULATIONS. If the bank are paying you out and you have an account open. Me thinks you are stuck with the deposited into your account scenario. If Cobblers pay you out its always by cheque, but can't do any harm in ringing Borehamwood to ask for cheque.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right-update on progress.

 

I have accepted the Nasty Vest offer and have posted back to them on teh 8th MAy the signed acceptance form as requested by Mr Higley in his letter dated 20th April.

 

Just phoned Customer Services to find out when the funds are likely to be paid to me and they have advised that as I have taken the matter to court they will not pay out until I have stopped the court process.

 

I have re read the letter from Mr Higley and nowhere does it state this and as I explained to them on the phone I wanted to keep the court side open just in case that there was a problem with the funds.

 

My question is-are Nasty Vest correct in saying this or is it just a [problem] to delay paying out the funds?

 

Ta

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that I should rename this thread 'Are Nat West dicking me around'

 

I have written to the Court and cancelled the claim as requested by Nasty Vest and have sent copies to NWB by both fax and post.

 

Just spoken to Customer Services and they do not have any record on my file of the fax being received(it was sent Monday) and they have said that they will contact me within the next 4 to 5 days.

 

As my acceptance was sent to them on the 8th May and as there was no mention in their letter that I needed to cancel the court case before they paid out is there anything else that I can do to chivvy them up?

 

Can I put in a claim, albeit small, for interest on the funds or can I cliam against them for the additional time that I have put in chasing them and writing to the court?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a copy of what I propose to send to Nasty Vest today in respect of the above

 

On the 8th May I sent back to yourselves a signed acceptance form in respect of my claim, ref 1224037501, for £4587.

I have telephoned yourselves on numerous occasions over the past couple of weeks to find out when the funds were likely to be paid to me and I was advised last week that as I had issued a claim against you for these funds on MCOL I would need to cancel this claim before I could get settlement from you.

My argument is that I wished to keep the claim open just in case you defaulted on this offer and also mentioned that this was not outlined in the original letter that I was sent.

Against my better judgement, and also going against advice that I have received from the Consumers Action Group, I have written to MCOL requesting that they cancel the claim and as such I now feel that I have fully complied with everything that you have asked of me.

Your customer relations department have noted on my file all of the above, but they have said that they will not be able to get back to me with a definite settlement date for at least another 7 days.

Please be advised that should I not get settlement of this claim within the next 7 days then I shall be forced to go back to the court in order to seek redress

Should you feel the need to discuss this with me I can be contacted on

Any suggestions?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to get this letter sent to Nasty Vest today so if any one has any comments could they let me know.

 

Many thanks.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PPMAN

 

I have had a similar situation on my thread with HSBC, I did not receive any offer before the amendment though. If you want please have a read on mine if it is going to be of any use.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-fd-hfc-successes/71876-make_me_happy-hsbc.html

Halifax - £245 - SETTLED - in full

MBNA Business - £190 - SETTLED - in full

HSBC - Closed business a/c - £1,850 - SETTLED IN FULL

HSBC - Business a/c - £4,388 - SETTLED FOR £4,100

Nat West Card - SETTLE IN FULL - £124.71

Halifax Credit Card - MCOL 26th May 2007

Egg - 1st LBA 12th May 2007

Are you a business customer, let's join forces subscribe to:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/68191-claiming-business-account-lets-6.html#post646109

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...