Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs beared to you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) basically saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
    • Hi Dave, I had no updates on this PCN since my last post in July 2019.  I received no further communications from the parking company.  I changed my address in May 2022. Thanks, I will send a letter to Excel parking to inform about the change in the address. 
    • I have a BMW Advanced Car Eye 3 Pro - I think it's 50/50  In any case, none of the documents / photos sent in the SAR showed a ticket on the car. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok. Here are all the documents that I received when I put in my copy of a credit agreement request. To me none of this look like a credit agreement. One of the pages does say credit agreement but there isn't any signatures at all. Another sheet says it's an application.

 

Please would somebody be kind enough to have a look and tell me their thoughts.

 

Many thanks in advance.

Credit Agreement 00.jpg

Credit Agreement 01.jpg

Credit Agreement 02.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please start your own thread and post these up there, as you'll get more attention and specific information that shouldn't be posted here.

 

Just keeps the forums clean and tidy. ;)

 

Post a link here once you've done that;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats better.

 

Ok.

(1) This is an application form and is not acceptable on its own to enforce an agreement.

 

(2) The first line at the top of

Credit Agreement 04

 

states it is PRE-Contract Information

 

 

(3)

Credit Agreement 05

 

Is dated 12th January 2006 and states that the loan started THAT DAY.

 

(4)

Credit Agreement 02

 

Contains a box for you to sign and date- It is unsigned and undated

Below is the Banks space for the Manager to sign- It is unsigned However it is dated 12th January 2006 - Which is 7 days before they state the loan agreement was to start.

 

 

Please remember that I am not legally qualified and it is only my advice.

GOOD LUCK

hsbcfiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubyrose - as has been mentioned, they can supply a copy of the agreement that isn't a copy of the agreement you signed... (if that makes sense). But, before they start court proceedings they had better have a true copy of the agreement showing your signature on a document with prescribed terms - otherwise game over. Contradictory eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edz you have just given me inspiration as to what to say to the latest DCA on my LTSB card (AIC). I shall simply send them a sheet of A4 with my reference number on the top saying in extremely large print "GAME OVER". :lol::lol::lol:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

And indeed to DLC/Hillesdens for my Barclaycard.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

EDZ11 -so when am i supposed to get the original signed copy to make sure that it is the original. Are they supposed to disclose it to me before court proceedings. Surly they cannot produce it at the hearing as i would not have been given adequate time to consider its validity.

 

Ruby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubyrose and mobileminx. I sent this letter on my OH behalf to a solicitor acting for a DCA.

 

 

from; mrs hsbcfiddled.

4th December 2007

to; Solicitor

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO DCA

Dear Sirs,

I received today your letter dated 30th November 2007 and postmarked the 3rd December 2007 that was in reply to my letter to you of 12th November 2007

In your letter of 30th November 2007 you have stated that you refuse my offer of £1 per calendar month and suggest £5 PCM even though I have explained my circumstances to you in my previous letter of the 12th November 2007.

However, you appear to have overlooked the fact that my offer of £1 PCM was ONLY IF you were able to produce the original agreement in a court of law.

I have repeatedly requested ‘a true copy of the agreement’.

You are adamant that a reconstructed agreement is acceptable.

I accept that the CCA1974 does allow you to reconstruct an agreement, when requested.

But you must retain the original agreement- why not look up the relevant section in the Consumer Credit Act 1974? You should know! You’re the professionals!

If your client has decided to destroy the original agreement and is prepared to purely rely upon a microfilmed reconstruction then please proceed to court where you can try your theory out.

My advice to your client would be that you as his solicitors are wasting his money on a case that you cannot win without the original agreement.

When I appear in court I shall show the court evidence that I have repeatedly requested sighting of a ‘true copy of the original agreement’ and had it been provided to me my appearance in court would not be necessary.

I believe that you are wasting the courts, your clients, and my time.

I believe the refusal to provide a true copy of the original agreement is because you have NOT retained the original agreement and that by providing reconstructed copies from microfilm you hope to assuage me into further payments.

I repeat my offer of £1 per calendar month, BUT ONLY IF, the original agreement is produced for my or the courts inspection.

Produce it to me or produce it in court. The choice is yours.

You state that you do not intend to enter into protracted correspondence. Well that’s fine by me. Please accept this as my final correspondence in the matter.

Yours Sincerely,

mrs hsbcfiddled

 

I have had no reply to date.

The point of the letter being that should it go to court the judge would then see that you have done your very best to avoid the court action.

What do you or anyone else think?

hsbcfiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honey1932 - I am not dealing with any particular company at the moment. I am just educating myself. I just don't have the guts like all of you here. I find it a rather daunting task, nevertheless prior to finding this site i had already engaged the services of a company to deal with these matters. It is extremely stressful and i don't like to find myself in constant conflict but i feel knowledge is power and i should know what those handling our money do to us.

HSBCfiddled thanks for sharing that letter yet again very informative. I hope by being around all of you on this forum i would get the nerve to challenge these organisations on my own steam - but right now i just couldn't deal with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi chaps , just a quickie , is a form that clearly say,s SKYCARD APPLICATION FORM . And does not show the credit limit anywhere , a true signed copy of the CONSUMER CREDIT AGREEMENT ? thankyou .

 

If it's missing a credit limit, (a prescribed term) it can call itself what it likes but it ain't no consumer credit agreement.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubyrose, I know exactly where you are coming from, I am brand new to this and its making me feel ill. I started out asking for a cca in Oct and planned to take it from there, I am in the very early stages and have not got the bottle to let it go to a DCA, I don't want it to go that far.

 

If I could afford to carry on paying I would happily do so, I am looking at my opitions and hoping to settle for half the debt if poss. If it gets too tricky I will put it in the hands of a solicitor, especially if I find the agreement (when it eventually arrives) is unenorceable.

 

There is so many conflicting opinions, one minute I am up in the air thinking I have nothing to worry about, then someone comes along and puts me in despair.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...