Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took advise on an RBS application/credit agreement form which I was informed was unenforceable. However someone else posted an identical form on this site and was advised by trading standards it was definitely enforceable in court. My application form did have a credit limit on it, plus my signature and a squiggle from someone at RBS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

....... I hope by being around all of you on this forum i would get the nerve to challenge these organisations on my own steam - but right now i just couldn't deal with it.

Hi RubyRose

 

I'm a fairly recent newcomer to CAG (3 months or so), but since joining the help and advice has been far better than that which I received from other sources. So far I have CCA'd 5 accounts (2x Link - MBNA, 2x 1stCredit - Citi, and Fredricksons - HSBC) and all of these have failed to supply an agreement. All 5 alleged debts are now in default (limbo) and I have not made any payments to them for the last 3 months.

 

I am not advocating avoidance of responsibilities to your debts, but why carry on paying them if the creditors have not fulfilled their legal obligations to you, and by continuing to do so you are causing further difficulties for yourself?

 

Just a suggestion, but why don't you try putting a toe into the water, so to speak, by CCA'ing just one of your creditors and see what results you get?

 

Perhaps you could start a thread and post a list of your creditors and ask for advice on which ones are most likely not to have legitimate agreements in force. If you do this it might be worth giving the approximate dates on which the accounts were opened as this may have some bearing on the likelihood of a particular creditor failing to possess an agreement.

 

If you do as suggested you may be pleasantly surprised and your confidence will be given a boost.

 

I personally felt better as soon as I had sent my first CCA requests off, just knowing that I was fighting back against the unscrupulous DCAs.

 

Good luck :)

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob i will think about it.

 

Ruby

If you decide to start a thread on this (probably this forum general-debt would be the one), maybe you could post a link so that we could follow and people could offer further advice :)

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

It works - believe me - and you don't need to use a company to do it for you.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob and Goldlady i wish i looked at CAG more and used the advice given here. Except i am going through a lot of difficulty and just feel i could do without the additional stress. The one thing that puzzles me and baffles me is how does wiping out ones credit card debt impact on their credit rating. This really scares me and i feel a professional needs to deal with that aspect or advise ob it.

 

I am just so scared.:oops:

 

Ruby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruby you will end up with default notices on your credit file - which stay there for six years. I already had them so it made no difference whatsoever when I stopped paying altogether. Interestingly I have just remortgaged and the lender paid no attention to the defaults as they were all for unsecured debts. OK I couldn't walk into a high street bank and get a mortgage but it does not have any real impact on your life - apart from meaning you aren't struggling to pay card debts anymore.

 

You are not doing anything wrong - they are in the wrong if they haven't done their paperwork properly (or in my case not even kept a copy).

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldlady my understanding is that once you have entered into a dispute with the credit card company then they are not to enter anything detrimental on your credit file until the situation is resolved. This is according to the banking code of practice which i found on the site and downloaded and read through. Everything i read and the more time i spend on the site is making me stronger and i might just start challenging one of my credit cards.

 

thanks once again for encouraging me.

Ruby:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably different in my case as I had already defaulted:D. I know there are several people who have gone through the courts to get defaults removed, and it seems logical that they can't default you when the account is in dispute. As I am not too worried about my defaults I have not pursued the matter (yet) as I seem to have lots of other things going on still. Getting them all off my back was a major relief.

 

And beware - CAG is addictive;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is VERY good news.

 

BBC News Player - Credit card debts wiped

 

 

have a look.

 

It is potentially very good news if we can get details of the judgement, however as yet I cannot find reference to this case on any of the court sites. I have emailed the couple to ask for a court reference number to get a copy of the judgement. So far, they haven't responded, perhaps not surprising as they have set up a site to charge people for doing this for them.

 

As it stands, we can't put in court papers that we saw a couple on the news, so we shouldn't pay, we will need the details for this to be any use.

 

I suspect they just do what we already do in challenging agreements etc, but if the Court of Appeal really has ruled on this, we need those details!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I suspect they just do what we already do in challenging agreements etc, but if the Court of Appeal really has ruled on this, we need those details!!

 

This could be quite valueable, lets hope some of the moderators are on the look out for this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure that they are not just using the Wilson case?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

somebody should ring Andrew Pritchard from CAB Rugeley and ask for the details of the appeal case

 

Rugeley Citizens Advice Bureau

7 Brook Square

Tel: 01889 577042

Fax: 01889 586126

 

I can't as I live in the USA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob and Goldlady i wish i looked at CAG more and used the advice given here. I wish I had found CAG earlier than I did as I missed the chance to defend a court action because of not knowing what to do. Except i am going through a lot of difficulty and just feel i could do without the additional stress. In my case, acting upon the advice given here has relieved a lot of the stress and made me more proactive. The one thing that puzzles me and baffles me is how does wiping out ones credit card debt impact on their credit rating. This really scares me That used to worry me, but not any longer and i feel a professional needs to deal with that aspect or advise ob it. I sought professional advice, and in my opinion it was useless. Unless you are very lucky and manage to speak to someone who is clued up on consumer law, you are IMHO better off taking the advice given by some of the more knowledgeable people here (I do not put myself in that category, but I think I'm learning).

 

I am just so scared.:oops: I guess it can be a bit scary (to start with), but in my experience so far that feeling soon goes! :D

 

Ruby

 

Goldlady my understanding is that once you have entered into a dispute with the credit card company then they are not to enter anything detrimental on your credit file until the situation is resolved. This is according to the banking code of practice which i found on the site and downloaded and read through. Some of the companies appear to be a law unto themselves regarding procedures, but with help from CAG you will be able to fight back. Everything i read and the more time i spend on the site is making me stronger and i might just start challenging one of my credit cards. Keep reading.... and go for it! ;)

 

thanks once again for encouraging me.

Ruby:)

 

Wishing you well in your decision to start taking control Ruby!

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a follow up to the (edit) site that challenged the 6 Credit Card companies wiping out their debts and getting a court ruling in the process.

 

See the link from Midlands Today

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7190000/newsid_7195100/7195126.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm&news=1&bbcws=1

 

Here are further details for people who dont have the belief that they can carry the process against the Lenders through to court.

 

 

 

 

 

The Consumer Credit Act

 

This is a very basic explanation as to why upto 75% of all credit card agreements are legally unrecoverable.

 

 

Below is an example of the print format a correct agreement should look like.

 

 

x y z

 

 

 

 

 

Below is how all the unenforceable agreements look, the difference is the xyz are in capitals not lower case and this would be a breach of the law.

X Y Z

 

 

 

The Court Case

 

We made a court claim against a lender stating that 50% of all of their agreements were improperly executed because they do not state xyz, but instead they state ABC. The lender claimed that as 50% of their agreements stated different letters the regulations do not apply, the court agreed with them.

 

A B C

 

Based on the Court of Appeal ruling which confirms what the regulations state, then any agreement that does not state xyz in lower case is improperly executed which is about 75% of all credit card agreements and it could be one or all of yours.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Does your Credit Card Agreement have the X-Factor?

We took our lender to court because we said the agreement was unenforceable because of a, b and c. The lender won the case because they proved that the agreement was enforceable because it did not contain X, the X-Factor we will call it. Based on our knowledge of other agreements we know that the majority of them, up to 75% do contain the X-Factor and are therefore unenforceable. It is not us that have made the other agreements unenforceable, it is the lender, a Court Recorder QC, a Rt. Hon Sir and a Lord Justice of the Court of Appeal who agreed with them. We are only using the lenders legal points that were used against us, if we are wrong then the lender and 3 judges are also wrong, so take it up with them. All we are doing is making use of what we have been told is the law.

Test Case already Won

Our case was the first of its kind and is now the leading case and sets a precedent as to how any lower court should treat enforcement of a credit card agreement that is improperly executed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's a new one on me. A secret judgement. :confused::confused:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

This credit card killer is very interesting (and tempting, I will wait a bit longer before signing up lol)

 

Can it not be too long before this gets in the media big time, it would be explosive, it would be the next best thing after the unfair bank charges. It would certainly deter the DCA's from purchasing these unenforceable debts and give us a break.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...