Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx, with link having multiple accounts for me, I didn’t want to be a pushover in the first one ideally.. hearing is 3rd June, WS’s to be exchanged by 6th may 
    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

bad head and getting worse round 2 ***WON!***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i find it very strange that lloyds seem to be dragging their feet with fzrkitten and my claim, i would of thought as lloyds were issued with a disclosure notice they would of settled weeks ago but that doesnt seem the case which i find very strange. are we missing something

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 290
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is it just that it's a lottery and there's no logic behind it at all?!

 

:rolleyes:

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take heart, my brother started his claim against HSBC in January and has only just got a court date for August.

I have a couple of questions for you:

 

1. How long did your first claim take from start to finish?

2. How was it resolved? Out of court Settlement?

3. Has there been any mention of them closing your acct?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Titch

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, thanks for that.

Sorry I didn't realsie you're claim had taken so long, obciously not fully awake when reading your thread this morning. But then it is monday!

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

so i posted my non compliance letter at the court today as my judge is sitting tomorrow, he seems a pretty fair guy as he issued the disclosure notice in the first place.

 

has ANYONE got any ideas as to where this can go from here, my first claim was just as stressful but was very simple

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Christina,

sorry can't answer but I'd say its down to the Judge now. Watch out for a strike out for abuse of process. Watch the post for nice big cheque! Watch out Lloyds we're on your case!!!

Good luck

Night Owl

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i find it very strange that lloyds seem to be dragging their feet with fzrkitten and my claim, i would of thought as lloyds were issued with a disclosure notice they would of settled weeks ago but that doesnt seem the case which i find very strange. are we missing something

 

Our claim has been going on for 7mths with Lloyds - we have a court date for 22nd August and sent disclosure letters, nudge letters, threatening letters (not really but a nice thought ;) ) and have heard nothing nor have had any settlement letters. You are not alone.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi christinajanep:)

 

It took 10 days from me applying for and recieving judgment, that was from a court that is saying it's very busy (but then i suppose they all are now!)

Then another 2 weeks or so for me to get the money, but that was for payment by cheque, hopefully it would be quicker if payment was going straight into a bank account.

 

I really hope your claim is finally on the way to getting sorted out, will keep everything crossed for you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

todau i have had the following:-

It is ordered that unless trhe defendant by 4pm on the 26th July 2007 comples with with paragraph 2 of the order dated 19th june 2007 the defence shall be struck out without further order and judgement be entered for the claimant..

 

is this good or bad news and will this now delay my claim as i had a court date for 10th september

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

todau i have had the following:-

It is ordered that unless trhe defendant by 4pm on the 26th July 2007 comples with with paragraph 2 of the order dated 19th june 2007 the defence shall be struck out without further order and judgement be entered for the claimant..

 

is this good or bad news and will this now delay my claim as i had a court date for 10th september

Excellent news! No, this won't delay the claim. If you don't hear anything by the 26th you need to hand in a N225 form to the court. I'll help you with it nearer the time, although its fairly easy anyway tbh. Only a couple of boxes to tick, etc.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

should i fax a copy to [problem] or not

If youy want to, although the court will have sent them it anyway.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. what is the chances of this getting sorted by the 26th. do u think lloyds will comply or settle the claim by then, the reason i'm asking is i'm taking two weeks holiday next week and it would be wonderful to have it sorted by then

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...