Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AQs - Stays & Strike out request


GaryH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you have experience with Lambeth , I would be interested to read it. Do you have a thread??

 

Sorry, not logged on for a couple of days. My experience with Lambeth is not connected with bank charges I'm afraid, but with a couple of other civil matters; a landlord dispute and another matter which is still ongoing after many, many months. If you get Judge Zimmels, tell him I called him a .... no maybe not :D

 

I guess all London courts are busy but Lambeth does seem to be known for dragging its feet. Unfortnately, Central London County Court, where I issued my bank charges case in the hope they might be a bit more efficient, seems even worse :mad:

 

Sorry i can't me of more help.

If I've helped, please tick the scales at the bottom left of this message!

 

17th Sept: Found this site! :)

 

Lloyds TSB

 

22 Sept: Subject Access Req.

3 Nov: statements arrived. Charges calulated at:

A/c 1 - £2,178.01 + int of £1,206.54 (18.4% authorised)

A/c 2 - £206.11 + int of £211.07 (18.4%)

7 Nov - prelim.

3 Dec - LBA

13 Dec - £750 offered

23 Dec - £750 credited

28 Dec - rejection letter

2 March - issued

16 April - complained at court failure to forward defence

 

Halifax

 

22nd September: Subject Access Request.

4th November: No reply so LBA giving 7 days.

 

Cap One

 

22nd September: Subject Access Req.

5th October: Letter saying no record of account!

15th October: Replied telling them to try harder...

22nd October: Subject Access Req acknowledged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Central London County Court is the worst court in the country. Fortunately I am on the receiving end of a claim from there, it took them 2.5 months to serve the claim, have not even received AQ yet and claim served in Feb 07. Funniest part is the claimant asked for a transfer to the Technology and Construction Court and the judge said in the hearing you made your bed lie in it.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been battling yorkshire bank and have already settled a few days ago for full amount see thread for details

 

voyager9 vs yorkshire ***WON***

 

i used the new draft directions with the aq together with lincoln order and strike out request for abuse of proccess,

 

today i received the following order

 

 

 

it is ordered that

 

the court of its owm motion is considering striking out the defence in this action as an abuse of process.

 

the basis for this is the fact that the defendant is settling all claims of this nature where claimants are seeking reimbusement of bank charges, with no claims proceeding to a contested hearing.

 

the court considers the authority of mullen v hackney london borough council (1997) 2 A11ER 906 relevant.

 

if the defendant objects to the proposed strike out it is ordered to file, within 14 days of the date of service of this order, a schedule setting out all claims of this type in england and wales which have proceeded to a final contested hearing, and the outcome of such hearings, together with a schedule of all such claims which it has compromised before final hearing, after proceedings have been issued.

 

upon receipt of any objections the court will consider listing the claim for an on notice hearing of the strike out issue.

 

in the absence of any such objections being filed on time, the defence herein will be struck out and judgement entered for the amount claimed by the claimant, together with the appropriate costs claimable on the small claims track.

 

 

voyager9 :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:

 

p.s. it was newark county court

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help guys. CAG has been fantasic!! :) :) :) :)

Got a settlement letter from LLoyds Solicitors ( I am a platinum account holder ) this morning. Will settle in full with interest and court fee's"!! Hurrah. £3,700! Have to sign a letter and agree to terms - making arrangement to have an account review. Am guess I just agree??? Thanks again....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary,

 

As you can't take PM's hopefully you will see this ?

 

I recieved a offer today, and in it regards the interest aspect they quoted the recent case of .....

 

Halliday v HBOS.

 

Would like to discuss this with you, and wonder if you could send me a PM or email ( I think you have my address from previousley)

 

Regards

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, first time poster here, so please forgive me if I don't make much sense (that and I have a fractured elbow and can't type properly)!!!

 

Started my claims off using MSE (I know some of you don't think too much of them!!), and have so far won 3 claims without too much hassle. Now that I've got to the court stages, I found a link to this site as you have all the court bundle stuff etc.

 

I've got 2 that are going to court - Abbey, who I've been given a date for, so everything hunky dory (I think), just sending the nudge letters and preparing all my bumpf to be posted before 20 July!

 

Lloyds, I'm still waiting for a court date, so I thought about sending the template for getting the case struck out (sorry can't remember the proper name of it!) and it mainly refers to Abbey - can I assume that the attachments/references relating to Abbey are equally relevant to any Lloyds cases??

 

Angie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay date is now up so expecting an AQ from court, have written to the solicitors 3 times (copies to court) since receiving the stay as judge was hoping we could settle. No reply from SC & M. Do I attach these letters or anything to the AQ .?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello everyone.

 

I hope you are all well. Have had a letter from Shabbey stating that if a stay has not been applied to my case , they should shortly be requesting one. I have heard nothing from Southampton C.C saying a stay has been applied for. What do I do? Should I write to the court to request that any req. for a stay be thrown aside? Shoudnt they have added it to their AQ already if they were going to. Is anyone else going through southampton?

So sorry to be dim.

Thank you.:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary

I prepared my AQ on Monday - but am not submitting it to Court til to-morrow Friday 10/8/07 - since mine for this 1 is a business claim I posted a copy to MARTINEAU JOHNSON ( who seem to be dealing with Business Claims ) on Monday. The thing is they sent me back their AQ to-day requesting a 1 month stay DO YOU THINK I DARE ADD THE REJECTION OF A STAY DRAFT as your new post since i have not filed yet - then post to solicitors saying i forgot to enclose. ?????;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

JGJ - I hope you are not getting the one month stay request on the AQ confused with the OFT stay (which does not apply to business claims).

 

No do not add the stay rejection to the AQ, just complete your AQ as here:

AQ Completion

AQ Attachment - Draft Order

 

Then read this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/78216-aqs-stays-strike-out.html

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guidot

No not getting mixed up what i said was that Iam due to file my AQ to-morrow Friday - but i completed it last week-end and posted it to MARTINEAU JOHNSON this past Monday. To-day i received a copy of Lloyds AQ which is asking the judge to grant months stay pending settlement talks. SO since Ive not took mine to court to register it yet - should i dare to add the comments gary made in the AQ - stays & strike out request thread thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Settlement talks ?

I think this may be more about the bank playing for time whilst awaiting the decision from the test case.

My own business claim has 3 times been adjourned at the Banks request pending some clarity.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...