Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
    • A sinister tactic known as shoulder surfing is on the rise in the UK. Fraudsters are watching unwitting people log in to their mobile banking apps over their shoulder.View the full article
    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC ..Total Charges Can I claim these????


hsbcfiddled
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4770 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

Hi Rhsy

 

Re : managed loan - no payments made since june. Local branch looking into circumstances of whole loan, same peron at local branch agrees that neither on the agrrements supplied have been properly executed.

 

Business account : received some statments - waiting on more.

 

Whats happening with your case Rhsy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a letter to Metropolitan saying they had no right to contact me and i will be complaining to the FOS due to them not providing a true copy of my agreement. They said that they have placed the account on hold while they await the Ombudsmans decision, only thing is i havent actually reported it yet as i dont know where to start !!

 

Any pointers for a FOS complaint Fiddler ? Anyone ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have made a complaint to FOS regarding a DCA.

 

Basically I complained that they;

1. Continued to try to get us to make a payment even though they had stated that they did not have or need the Executed agreement.

2. Because they had only bought the deed of assignment therefore they did not need to comply with request for executed agreement CCA 1974 and that we were still required to pay the debt.

3. They had failed to supply the agreement within the time guidelines and even in their final response letter asked us to pay £1000 as a one off payment.

4. failed to comply with my request for nil balance and remove any subsequent defaults.

 

I also section 10 them regarding my data.

I have sent copies of all communication between us just last week.

 

I will post the response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

update:

 

Received 26th October 2007 from Mohsan Yousuf at HSBC a final demand for Managed Loan account.

and personal account (overdrawn and mostly made up of charges and bounced payment requests/refunds of Managed loan payment requests- which of course they are not allowed to try to take)

 

The demand follows this letter that I wrote them.

 

 

Mr. hsbcfiddled

Fiddled Town

PO2 U2

M. XXXXXXX

Local Branch

HSBC

 

3rd October 2007.

FAO: M. xxxxxxxx and HSBC Legal Department.

 

Managed Loan account no. xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear M. XXXXXX,

 

On June 8th 2007 I wrote to Mr. Somebody at HSBC requesting the following;

 

“With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), we are entitled to receive a true copy of our credit agreement on request. We enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act”.

 

On July 12th 2007 we received from Miss. Someonelse at HSBC a first copy of an agreement, (albeit well outside the timeframe set by the Consumer Credit Act 1974) as a result no further requests for payment or charges can be added to the account from June 28th 2007 until a true copy of the executed agreement has been produced.

 

We wrote back to Miss. Someonelse at HSBC on the July 17th disputing the authenticity of the copy provided.

 

On August 16th I received a second copy (with no crossings’ out etc) of the supposed agreement. I wrote to Miss. Someonelse again at HSBC this time on the 21st August disputing the authenticity of the second copy.

 

We have now been referred to you M.XXXXXXX

 

Without going into the reasoning for being placed on a managed loan- re charges etc we will list below our disagreement of the authenticity of the agreement itself.

 

 

  • Terms and Conditions-

Neither of the copies has the actual terms and conditions that we have paid from the first to last payments made.

Both copies state initial payment of £xxx.xx then 95 monthly payments of £xxx.xx

but,

we have made some 39 four weekly payments of £YYY.YY

 

This point alone makes the agreement incorrectly executed and therefore unlawful.

 

 

 

  • Apr %-

The Apr figure on both copies is based on monthly payments

whereas arrangements were made for four weekly payments this would therefore affect the Apr percentage and therefore the Apr figure would not be accurate.

This point alone makes the agreement incorrectly executed and therefore unlawful.

 

  • Date in customers signature box-

The date has been applied in the customer’s signature box ......but it has been added by a bank official..... WITHOUT US BEING PRESENT

Therefore as it has been left undated by the customers- we the customers- would not know when our right to cancel started or even expired.

This point alone makes the agreement incorrectly executed and therefore unlawful.

 

  • Customers signature-

On close examination of the signature of Mr. hsbcfiddled the signature does not resemble Mr hsbcfiddled's signature.

 

These signatures have obviously not been verified by the Bank official before the loan was commenced?

This point alone makes the agreement incorrectly executed and therefore unlawful.

 

In conclusion.

 

If the agreement has not been executed to conform to the requirements of Consumer Credit Act 1974 then it is unlawful.

 

Only one of the four points that I have raised need be proved to invalidate this agreement and I have raised four.

 

This loan should never have commenced and has been poorly managed.

 

Recompense.

 

This managed loan has now been in default since June 28th 2007 therefore you cannot from that date request payments from us, add interest, add charges, or register defaults, or attempt to sell this debt.

Please adjust current account accordingly

 

To rectify this situation we will accept a cheque in full refund of all payments with added compounded interest @ 14.8% Apr as settlement.

We believe that 14 days is ample time for you to respond given that the initial concerns raised regarding this managed loan were raised in a letter to Colin Langdale in April 2007.

 

Yours Sincerely

Mr hsbcfiddled

 

 

 

The demand also states that they may give details of this default to CRA's (not that worries me as I do not want any credit anyway)

 

 

In reply to the Final demand I have the following letter waiting to go in the post.

 

 

Dear Mohsan Yousuf,

 

In reply to your unlawful letter of demand for payment letter of 16th October 2007

 

This managed loan has now been in default since June 28th 2007 therefore you cannot from that date;

 

1. Request payments from us,

2. Add interest,

3. Add charges,

4. Register defaults,

5. Or attempt to sell this debt.

This debt is unenforceable.

 

I am extremely annoyed at HSBC’s failure to respond within a reasonable timeframe, and I am not willing to explain to you, or anymore of HSBC’s employees, their legal obligations.

 

If you contact the branch manager they will provide you with a copy of my letter dated 3rd October 2007 to M. xxxxxx & your legal department.

 

I will today report you Mohsan Yousuf to the OFT for this letter of demand when the managed loan is already in default.

The OFT are already examining HSBC handling of this account and HSBC have been advised.

 

Please proceed with whatever action you deem fit.

However any actions that do not comply strictly with the CCA1974 act- failure to provide a copy of an executed agreement- will be reported.

 

Mr hsbcfiddled.

 

 

 

Your thoughts please, anyone?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fiddled, I also got a letter from Mohsun Yousuf, and replied asking if that was his final word on the matter. Stating that if it was, I would be complaining to FOS. He eventually replied that yes, this is the banks final word and he will wait to hear from the FOS. Havent heard anything for a couple of months now, but i also havent filed a complaint with the FOS yet (being evicted due to landlord not paying rent, which is fun).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Mohsan Yousuf, hes not having much luck with his debt collection for HSBC.

I also had a letter from him that happened to arrive about a week before my stay appeal hearing. I sent a copy to the court along with a copy to DG and a copy back to Moshan to show him what I had done with his seven day payment letter, not heard anything else yet :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Went online yesterday to check;

1. If further attempts have been made to take managed loan from my account or

2. Any charges had been added because I havent put any money into this account since July 2007 to prevent them taking payments.

 

Well I couldnt gain access it kept throwing up a HK3 code and a contact number.

 

So I phoned them up and was told "account closed" and passed to Metropolitan (MCS).

I told them 'you cant do that' but of course the person I was speaking to didnt have a clue regarding CCA 1974. I went on 'for the benefit of the tape' to tell them that the hierarchy who make these decisions were in my opinion "the **** of the earth, and that my money would have been safer with Dick Turpin, and Bank officials had replaced tax inspectors, traffic wardens, and estate agents as the most hated in Britain, and as for listening bank...............rant rant rant.

I know it was a waste of time - but the cat was grateful.

 

Well after all that she gave me a number to ring 0500 992 299

which turned out to be in the Phillipines.

When I phoned MCS they told me 'we dont have anything on the system yet'. I told them 'dont bother putting anything on the system because you wont be collecting anything off me'

 

I want to take court action against HSBC for this managed loan what are my options?

They have taken £10,000 in payments without a properly executed agreement and I want it back with compounded interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have a case, they have totally messed up the managed loan agreement and therefore the loan is firmly in dispute and unrecoverable by HSBC.

 

How a judge would view this in court is another matter, I think you would be on fairly safe ground with regard to interest and any charges but with regard to the initial debt, morally you have had this money from HSBC so they would probably say you have to repay it.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have a case, they have totally messed up the managed loan agreement and therefore the loan is firmly in dispute and unrecoverable by HSBC.

 

How a judge would view this in court is another matter, I think you would be on fairly safe ground with regard to interest and any charges but with regard to the initial debt, morally you have had this money from HSBC so they would probably say you have to repay it.

 

pete

 

Yes I can understand the morale side of the argument.

But that works two ways because I can argue that my business (pre managed loan) was penalised with charges-which generated interest fees- that added together exceed the managed loan.

Indeed that is what the managed loan represents.

 

However HSBC may not be able to challenge the business charges because they do not hold details beyond six years! (they say)

 

 

Fiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

could be wrong here but i see some parallels with greedfighter's arguments - you might like to take a look - This will make you laugh !!!!! (multipage.gif1 2 3

 

 

Hi lattie,

Nice to hear from you.

 

I have read greedfighters case and find it amazing.

But I cannot see the paralells (just got up- working nights- well thats my excuse) ?

 

Fiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I can understand the morale side of the argument.

But that works two ways because I can argue that my business (pre managed loan) was penalised with charges-which generated interest fees- that added together exceed the managed loan.

Indeed that is what the managed loan represents.

 

However HSBC may not be able to challenge the business charges because they do not hold details beyond six years! (they say)

 

 

Fiddled

If the managed loan was set up to cover costs incurred solely as a result of charges then you have a solid argument against the loan and charges!

 

Even though they may not hold any records beyond 6 years (I don't beleive that either) you still have to prove they owe you the money by providing the statements yourself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the managed loan was set up to cover costs incurred solely as a result of charges then you have a solid argument against the loan and charges!

 

Even though they may not hold any records beyond 6 years (I don't beleive that either) you still have to prove they owe you the money by providing the statements yourself!

Must I have the statements- What if i provide a list of charges with the dates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW I forgot to mention that my branch manager (who I have spoken to at length in the last month, re managed loan) phoned me yesterday and from their tone of the voice and attitude I get the feeling that the branch manager was ashamed of the way I have been treated and that they could not believe that the account closure had been sanctioned.

They went on to say "I cannot believe they have done this with the level of people that I have passed this to. Dont do anything yet I will get back to you soon with some answers. I hope".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the list from? Was it supplied by the bank?

 

The list will be provided by me - however, as a company we do not keep statements beyond six years.

My accountant is willing to swear an affadavit re the charges levied on this account and i have a letter from him with end of year accounts going back to 1993.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW I forgot to mention that my branch manager (who I have spoken to at length in the last month, re managed loan) phoned me yesterday and from their tone of the voice and attitude I get the feeling that the branch manager was ashamed of the way I have been treated and that they could not believe that the account closure had been sanctioned.

They went on to say "I cannot believe they have done this with the level of people that I have passed this to. Dont do anything yet I will get back to you soon with some answers. I hope".

 

Well I had the phone call today.

To summarise-

1. They would like a face to face meeting to discuss the managed loan.

Apparently the managed loan (that is in default) was an amalgamation of another managed loan (news to me-loan maybe-but managed loan?) and a personal loan.

They would like to discuss restarting the previous managed loan???????

2. They wont be able to discuss charges.

Well I am prepared to listen to what they have to say.

However I am even more confident now than I was before.

1. They cannot believe they have a hope in hell of enforcing the defaulted loan because they would have me in court instead of closing the account.

2. They want to discuss restarting a loan that has been terminated..... If they were able to do so they wouldnt be asking to speak to me- they would be demanding payment.

3. They would like me to agree to paying the managed loan and i have said i am willing to do so....providing all charges are refunded with compounded interest.

Thoughts please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the crux of the complaints about the managed loan is that the original debt is made up almost exclusively of accumulated bank charges.

added to the fact that the loan itself is set up like a mortgage - where the early payments are almost exclusively interest - taking almost nothing off the capital of what is owed. it has long been my contention that had it not been for the original unlawful and punitive charges - the debt would not have spiralled into such an amount that the bank entices people into the managed loan. it does seem logical that the interest on the managed loans, being made up of bank charges which you are questioning, would therefore be refundable. this was the basis for tigs33 and her getting her husband's managed loan repaid. (Husband v HSBC - Paid :-)granted this was way last year when things were different - but if it helps you see a bigger picture - then it would be worth a read.

my comments about the parellels with greedfighter - i meant there is more than one way to skin a cat - and sometimes fighting the bank might require some thinking outside the box -

just hoping something might come out which could help you in your situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...