Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jason v Abbey


,hills
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After seeming like a lifetime, I have finally received a Court date.

 

But is it too late ???

 

It has been allocated the small claims track (although over £5,000) for August 28th at my local County Court.

 

I have to send in the Court Bundle to both parties I presume ?

 

It says that it has been block listed and with an hour in total ?

 

In light of recent things in the news, do you think the case will go ahead ?

 

Is it worth contacting the Court to confirm or even Abbey for a settlement ?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

TBH i wouldnt bother trying to contact abbey, they have said they will not enter into any further negotiations, they only knock you back with stupid amounts anyway.

 

Your case should still go ahead, make sure you have complyed fully with the orders, if a stay is ordered then we need to appeal, but no body knows if this will happen, there are so many scaremongerers out there the worst being the press, dont panic, make sure you comply with the judges directions and attend court.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please post me the link to what I need to take to Court.

 

Also, do I need to copy the Abuse stuff etc I have already given both the Court and Abbey and resend that?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain, but have a bit of spare time today so I want to get the stuff ready to give in to Court and post to Abbey.

 

Can someone please post me the thread or advise what I need to give in / send to both parties.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my word !!

 

Having checked the link above and decided in the dead of night to do the Court Bundle, I've noticed that it is massive !!!

 

I don't think I'm going to have enough paper (or ink) to start it.

 

I'll have to go out Saturday to some more. It's not worth doing some of it and then stopping.

 

Can you please advise me on.

 

1) Roughly how many pages will it be to both party's.

2) Do I have to add the Abuse papers I sent for my defence (as it say's attatch all correspondance).

3) Do I have to bind the papers or just leave loose and number them.

4) Should I call Abbey first to try and reach an agreement before spending hours doing the bundle.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your queries as they were posed:

 

1. between 130 - 200 pages mine was 145.

 

2. all correspondence that does not have "without Prejudice" on it. Except Court correspondence, all parties would have these.

 

3. I bound mine and used numbered page dividers to correspond with the sections/exhibit number shown in my bundle index.

 

4. As previously stated on this thread, there seems little point in current circumstances, although yours is the final descision on this one.

 

I must admit I am considerably less experienced than most contributers on this site but I think the above to be correct. If it is not correct i apologise now and stand corrected.

 

My bundle was due in by end of play today. I actually sent mine, by special delivery to the Abbey on 27/07/07 and hand delivered court copy on same day. Today is the last day for Abbey to comply with the judges directions. Trouble is with all the uncertainty I don't know what to do. Do I send a compliance reminder to the Abbey giving them a further 7 days or do I go straight for the letter to the court requesting that the Abbey's defence be struck out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What with the weekend and the kids off school, I didn't manage to get the Court Bundle done.

 

Have now printed off the Court Bundle and I am in the process of copying the letters between me and Abbey.

 

Can you please clarify the above question and response -

 

Do I need to copy for all parties the Defence I submitted and Abbey's one and also the Allocation Questionairre.

 

Sorry to be a pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court case due 28th August.

 

I called the Court last week and they said that all case's are still being heard.

 

I have been away for the past few day's so havn't kept in tough with the forums latest news (also had to delete 2,000 emails upon my return), so I'm sorry if I'm going over old ground.

 

In my post upon return was a letter from Abbey saying ...

 

My claim in relation to charges is being litigated in the County Court.

We still we are being fair.

We are writing County Courts to stay cases.

Waiting for Test case.

We have written to you offering a goodwill offer (too late, time has elapsed).

 

I presume this is normal.

 

I might give the court another call tomorrow to see if they are ignoring the 'Stay'.

 

I might be wrong, but the wording of the letter seems that they are getting worried.

 

Any advice ??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes it is perfectly normal, and just for clarity the banks have requested a stay from the court, it is up to the court as to whether they grant it or not, some are, some arent, yes I got the feeling in June when they were making loads of offers that they were trying to clear the decks too

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been catching up with things since being away, and have noticed other threads.

 

I made sure I handed in my 'Bundle' to the Courts and posted it to Abbey before I went away and the 14 day deadline elapsed before the 28th Court case.

 

Where is my copy of their Bundle delivered to me ?

 

Do I not get to see their's or do I just have to accept a letter saying they are plannning to propose a Stay ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they havnt filed their bundle on time then you need to send them an email, and hard cpy it via recorded and copy it to the court

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

[You] –v- Abbey Plc

Claim No: ********

 

I write in relation to the claim as detailed above, and specifically the order made by District Judge ******* dated [date].

 

You were ordered by the court to by [date] file and serve the documents upon which your client intends to rely at the forthcoming hearing. For your reference, a copy of the order to which I refer is enclosed with this letter.

 

To date I have received no such documents and accordingly you are now in breach of the aforementioned court order.

 

Please note that the evidence upon which I intend to rely was both filed and served pursuant to the order of the court on [date].

 

Your non-compliance creates a significant imbalance between the parties in light of the forthcoming hearing, which is contrary to the overriding objective. This imbalance is particularly exacerbated by the fact that you are specialist solicitors representing a powerful financial institution, whereas I am a litigant in person. I feel that your litigation should be conducted in a professional manner befitting of such a prestigious organisation.

 

In view of the above, I will request at the hearing that the District Judge gives consideration to whether your client's defence should be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)© and/or (b).

 

Please reply at your earliest conveniance explaining why you have not served the documents as ordered and stating by when I can expect to receive them, or alternatively, indicating that you wish to settle these matters without the need for a hearing.

 

I look forward to your prompt response.

 

Yours faithfully

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

- Should I call the Court first to see if they have received a copy of their defence.

 

- What email should I use ? There is nothing mentioned on the letter and it looks like it is signed S. Bromley.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court case in 7 days time.

 

Called the Court and told them I have not received their bundle and they said the they will make a note of it.

 

Is there anything I should do or just expect the worst.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not too late until you're told it's stayed and then you can still argue for it not to be stayed.

 

Get the letter etcetera sent today and mark it FOR THE URGENT ATTENTION OF whatever your judge is called.

 

Argue your case vigorously, you have a right to be heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the above

 

I really do not want to sound ungrateful, but is it really worth the printing and delivering of the Witness Statements and asking for the Removal of Stay if it's not going to do me anygood and it end's up Stayed anyway.

 

I really appreciate the help I've had but I'm feeling a bit down at the moment. I've had a few personnal issues lately and I'm now thinking what could have been getting me out of a rut, is now going to be put on hold for 6 months with no guarentee of a positive result.

 

I'm sorry for being so negative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do not want to sound ungrateful, but is it really worth the printing and delivering of the Witness Statements and asking for the Removal of Stay if it's not going to do me anygood and it end's up Stayed anyway

 

Nothing's guaranteed, you won't know if you don't try, but there have been several refusals of stays. Don't make it easy for the banks. It ain't over till the fat lady sings!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

After my case was 'Stayed' as expected, has there been any indication of how the High Court Case next week is going to go ?

 

I presume it is still scheduled for next week ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...