Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2392 Ann v Lloyds tsb


2392ann
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6205 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If I have two accounts that I am claiming money back on. The totals are £3126 plus £518.45 interest and £2179 plus £414.54 interest, totalling £6237.99. Do I claim the amounts separately keeping each one below £5000 or can I put them through as one?

 

I think I will save £10 if i put them through seperately as the court costs are £240 above £5000, but £120 each below £5k, which would be the best one, does it make any difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If I have two accounts that I am claiming money back on. The totals are £3126 plus £518.45 interest and £2179 plus £414.54 interest, totalling £6237.99. Do I claim the amounts separately keeping each one below £5000 or can I put them through as one?

 

I think I will save £10 if i put them through seperately as the court costs are £240 above £5000, but £120 each below £5k, which would be the best

one, does it make any difference?

:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to you but you might prefer to claim for them seperately (at the same time) to keep below the £5000 limit. It's not a problem to have two seperate claims at the same time (we had three) and I personally think it's easier to keep the accounts seperate.

 

Don't forget that it doesn't matter about saving money for court costs as they will get refunded - providing you do everything in the right way and don't end up getting your claim struck out.

 

Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lucid

Just one more thing, I asked the same question by replying to my own previous threads but got no response so I started a new thread, was I correct in doing this? I would like to keep all my threads together but I'm not sure if I'm using this sight correctly, can you help!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to stick to one thread so that your progress can be followed easily. If no one answers your post then just reply to your own thread with BUMP (Bring up my posting).

 

Sometimes posts just do not get answered, although now unlikely as Lucid is subscribed to your thread and is pretty good at responding.

 

If you are just getting no response, just PM someone on your thread saying have a look at my thread. We are all here to help you.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I might have made a boo boo!!

 

I originally received and email via Martin Lewis' money expert website with claiming back bank charges. I originally used his template for calculating interest as I had not come across this site. His advice is to claim 8% statutory interest. I've pasted his email below:-

Charge interest on top

If you won via the courts, you would be entitled to add 8% interest (not compounded) on top from the date you were ‘first deprived’ of the money (i.e. the date of each charge). Therefore you may want to ask for the interest as part of the initial claim. It's important to understand that you are not legally entitled to interest unless you win in court, yet all prior letters are a tool of negotiation; think of it a bit like haggling.

 

You may get lucky and get the interest on top, but even if not, the legal feedback I've had is that it’s one route to pushing the bank to settle quickly so it can offer to pay you without the interest. Of course there is a risk that asking for too much makes them less likely to settle too - sadly this is an art not a science. This isn't an easy concept so I've recorded a quick

which may help explain it.

 

For those who do want to ask for interest, I’ve had the calculator below specially built to work it out for you and included it as an option in the template letters later. However, if you'd prefer to play safe simply ask for the charges without interest in the early stages.

BankChargeCalc.gif

 

Charge Amount: £

 

When was the charge?

D: M: for(year=1999;year

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not agree with M Lewis' point regarding the claiming of statutory interest prior to filing the claim, I understand his rationale though.

 

I consider that by including it, it shows that you do not fully understand what you are doing.

 

If you have included it, well not to worry, just carry onto the next stage, it is very likely you will end up filing the claim and including the 8% anyway.

 

I would stick to the steps recommend in this site.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lucid

Just one more thing, I asked the same question by replying to my own previous threads but got no response so I started a new thread, was I correct in doing this? I would like to keep all my threads together but I'm not sure if I'm using this sight correctly, can you help!!:)

 

Hi,

 

If you want your threads to be merged then you just need to Private Message a Moderator and give them the links of the threads you'd like to merge - that way all of your previous questions with answers can be in one place. You can also ask them to change the thread title.

 

Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the end my thread came through.

I have sent LBA letter requesting refund plus 8%, they have not responded, shall I submit my court claim without interest or add on Stat Interest 8% as in my LBA or change to contractual interest. I read one thread which said I'm unlikely to get my money if i've added the 8% at this stage (LBA). If all I get back is the charges then that would great, the interest to me is a bonus.

Sorry to ask this question again but I just want to make sure I'm going about it the correct way.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have not responded to the LBA, then file the claim 14 days after with interest.

 

It is your personal choice as to whether you claim contractual or statutory interest. In summary you are definitely entitled to statutory (once the claim is filed) but contractual interest has yet to be tested in the courts. This link may help you decide:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html#post142054

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Please can you explaing what the overdraft interest is? I feel like I'm going backwards with all this. Below is a paragraph from stage 2 letter; What exactly is the overdraft interest they have charged me? Is this the statutory or contratual interest? If not how do I calculate it?

 

I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken.

I'm sure that it explains somewhere but I can't find it and I am starting to pull my hair out. I don't want to give up but I'm starting to get frustrated with myself as I've already made a mistake in adding the 8% on the 2nd letter!

 

Any adivice that you have would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Firstly don't worry at all that you included the statutory interest in your prelim letter. As GuidoT says, it's not a major mistake and you will leave it out of your LBA now.

 

As for the overdraft interest this is neither statutory or contractual. Overdraft interest is interest you have paid the bank yourself. For example if you have an overdraft you wil get charged interest for using the overdraft. If you go overdrawn without permission (the act that results in getting charegd) then you will get charged a higher rate of interest. We are entitled to claim back the portion of itnerest that has only occurred because of the bank's charges. Using a spreadsheet you can work out roughly how much this is - but a lot of poeple don't bother. I think that if you have been taken overdrawn by the bank's charges a lot then it's worth working out as it could amount to a lot, but if you have abrely been taken overdrawn by their charges then the amount you can reclaim will probably be small.

 

You don't have to include it in your claim and if you don't just take out the sentence that refers to it in the letter.

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply but I'm still not sure what to do next, I'll summarise what I've done to date:-

 

1. Sent letter requesting repayment of charges of £2179, these charges are o/draft excess fees and unpaid d/debits plus 8% interest (which I now know I shouldn't have added). - Received letter back saying sorry but I should have looked after my account better....blah blah blah.

 

2. Sent LBA for the same amounts but have had no response.

 

I now need to send off claim. Do I claim back £2179 plus adding on overdraft interest (using the speadsheet from Mindzai's) plus the statutory or contractual interest.

 

Should I write to the court explaining why the amount I am claiming differs from the amount originally requested from LTSB?

 

Can you write it in simple terms, I'm getting very confused.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ann,

 

Sorry to add to the confusion - I missed that you'd already sent your LBA.

 

What you do now with regards to filing your claim is entirely up to you. If you want to add overdraft interest onto your claim now then I don't think it will matter that you haven't included it before.

 

As for statutory interest you are now entiteld to add it to your claim.

 

You mentioned adding contractual interest but obviously you haven't mentioned contractual interest in your letters to the bank. I would advise against adding this on to your claim. If you seriously want to consider the contractual interest route then I suggest you thoroughly research it and then start over again - with the prelim. That probably seems like an extreme suggestion but if you are serious about claiming it then you should follow the correct procedures - just to ensure you do everything properly.

 

Whatever you decide to do you won't need to write to the court and explain the amounts. All they will need is your completed claim form, particulars of claim a current schedule of charges.

 

I hope that helps,

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lucid

I think I understand now.

I am going to claim back overdraft interest as both my claims add up to quite a lot, plus also the 8% stat interest.

How do I calculate overdraft interest? At what rate?

On using Mindzai's spreedsheet (for stat Int) :-

On my sheets from LTSB I have the date and description of charges, I am thinking the date they charge you overdraft interest is for the previous month!?

I do not have all my balances at the time of the charges applied, (I have some original statements but the rest are just the charges) I have tried to download my statements but it doesn't allow me to, do you have any advice on where to go from here.

Thanks

Ann

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ann your threads merged and I also retitled for you

 

Martin:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just received, a little late (11 days), a response to my LBA letter saying it's very easy to keep a running check on the balance of your account blah blah blah, but they quote the following:-

 

Generally we don't agree to adjust any of these charges, but I can tell you that on this occasion we are prepared to reduce these charges by repaying you £645. I have also arranged for £105 of charges to be waived due to come out of your account in the immediate future. You may have read that we and the other banks are discussing overdraft charges with the Office of Fair Trading. Meanwhile we do consider each customer's position individually, and we are making you this offer as a gesture of goodwill because we might face that cost in dealing with your complaint if you took it any further.

 

It then goes on to say that they do not have any leagal obligation to repay this money, to keep within my limit, that it's the banks final response and if I am not happy to complain to the Ombudsman within six months.

 

Do I write to accept this as partial repayment and that I am carrying on with my claim. Is there a template letter for this??

 

I have read other threads with similar responses from LTSB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found a template letter responding to the letter received from LTSB as in my last thread.

 

My LBA letter was sent 29/1/07 they didn't respond within the 14 days but 24 days, i've pasted my response letter below and would like to know if i've ammended it correctly to suite my situation, I haven't sent off my court claim yet but intend to do so next week (going slowly to make sure I don't make a mistake) do I give them another 7 days to respond before I go ahead with my claim?

can anyone adivse me on this?

 

Thank you for your letter dated 19/02/07

I respectfully decline your offer as Full and Final settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

My Letter Before Action dated 29/01/07 indicated that you had until 12/02/2007 to respond before I proceed to the next stage of my request, before I commence legal action. My deadline remains the same despite this offer.

 

If you do not accept my conditions, or you do not respond within 7 days, I wish to stress that I do not accept your offer and any money transferred to my account should not be viewed as my acceptance. I hereby authorise you to remove this sum accordingly.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Barty

Do I take out the '7 days' in the letter, have I changed the letter to suite my needs correctly?

Thanks

Ann

Hi Ann

Yes I would take it out, but it's up to you.:)

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have completed the compound sheet for two different accounts, my query is the amount on statutory interest being added to the total penalties, as below:-

 

Acc 1

total penalties - £3346.00

8% stat int - £681.93

Interest on penalties £288.21

8% stat int - £ 47.31

 

Acc 2

total penalties - £2154.00

8% stat int - £24.25

Interest on penalties - £363.63

8% stat int - £64.25

 

There is a substantial difference between the 8% stat int on penalty charges (£681.93 and £24.25).

Could I have done something wrong, surely the £24.25 should be considerably more or the £681.93 considerably less.

Can anyone shed any light on ths, I don't want to send it off when one or the other could be wrong.

Thanks:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...