Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with Diamond Insurance Claim


Dorisandthehoff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

We had an accident in our fully comp covered car back in August 2006 where as I was driving down the motorway the bonnet flew up and cracked my windscreen and did all sorts of other damage to the car to boot but luckily nobody was hurt.

 

My insurance policy was due to expire in the September and we took a month to deliberate whether we wanted to put in a claim or not as we were not sure of the extent of the damage at the time, I did inform the insurance company of the accident as soon as it happened though.

 

In the September my insurance policy needed renewing, I did not ask to renew as we had decided to claim at this stage and our car was a right off but it rolled on automatically it seems and they continued to take direct debits from my account.

 

When we put our claim in we got a cheque from their customer service department immediately for £117 which they said was due to our no longer needing the policy to cover installments already made.

 

We then put our claim in in the October and we only heard from them in January after much chasing as to what offer they were going to make us on our car as they said it was a right off.

 

The lady on the phone said she could not find our car anywhere to put a value on it and asked us what we expected, we said £2200 and she said that she could not offer more than £1080 then and there and to get more we would have to supply some adverts of similar cars to prove its worth.

 

I found a very similar car to ours by return and sent the information to her to prove the cars value.

 

We then received a cheque in the post from them for just over £500!

 

When I queried this I was told that it was £1080 less my excess (agreed) and the remainder of my insurance policy for the year? They had taken off a whole years premium that they new I did not need??

 

I then got a letter from them saying a cheque was in the mail to me for £830 which was their valuation less my excess and that I could bank this without prejudice whilst they waited on my proof that the car was worth more money.

 

I received a cheque for a much lower value and wrote to query this.

 

I then got a letter back with reference to my car stating that they would only pay me more if I can supply them with an advert of a car with exactly the same spec, age and mileage?

 

I wrote back saying that finding a car advert that meets all of this criteria would be impossible and therefore they were asking an unfair requirement of me, I pointed out again that I had supplied an advert of a very similar car and was asking for less than that was valued at anyway.

 

After no response i am now following their complaints procedure but still have no cheque for at least £830, I only have a cheque for £500 which I have not banked in principle.

 

Anybody else suffered a similar issue? Any tips on how to beat these insurance :-x !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok let me get this right here.

 

Your claim was made on last years insurance, but they have deducted the premium for this years insurance??? They cannot do that, advise that you had no insurable interest on the vehicle for this year, and they should refund all the money (Although the car was still yours it had no value - an item needs a value o be insured)

 

If they deducted the remainder of last years insurance from the settlement cheque you need to query the amount they refunded you against the amount they have deducted. If there is any difference you need to query this. If it is the same amount they can do this.

 

You also need to explain to them that they are being unreasonable asking for a vehicle with the same details.

 

Granted, your advert should be a vehicle of the same year/plate and make model (trim is not necessary), the similar mileage is recomended. However, if you find a vehicle with substantially more / less than your car, calculations can be made on Glass's guide to adjust. Do you know the glasses guide (Retail and Trade) prices?

 

Depending on the accuracy of the adverts you sent them you may have a case to go to the Ombudsman, on the basis they are being unreasonable.

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doris

 

What car is it? What year and what mileage. If you tell me this I can check a glasses guide for you on monday when Im back at work and let you know the retail/trade prices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I had exactly the same thing happen to me! They wrote off my car, denied receiving documents, didn't record information in my file, denied I'd told them about speeding points and finally insulted me with a cheque that was less than 25% of the cra's value and less than the policy cost for that year! They also cancelled the policy instantly without informing me and left me driving my husband's car uninsured (I thought I'd still got 3rd party on another car cover).

 

I spent hours on the telephone shouting, asking nicely, being reasonable and trying to sort this out. Ultimately it seems despite my being a loyal customer for 7 years I'm supposed to be a liar. I'd suggest you keep records of who you speak to and when, including what they tell you, send everything recorded delivery and to a named manager, and finally hassle them constantly because it seems to be the only way they'll listen - they finally caved in slightly and added another 20% to the settlement, but had the cheek to deduct £100 for them losing my MOT, which they said they couldn't check online for because they'd lost my registration document!!!!!!!

 

Good luck because you'll need it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. How could they say that the value should be no more than £1080 when they admitted that they had no details of the car?

2. How can they say that they have no details of the car when they are insuring one?

3. Why are they deducting premium for a cancelled policy instead of putting it on the previous year's policy which is (presumably) fully paid?

 

Those are the questions you need to ask. I suggest you do it in writing and mark it as a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I had an accident on my third party insurance, someone went into the back corner of my car, they made me a cash offer plus the return of my written off car, which I accepted by taking the car back and selling it, and now they are saying they may be withdrawing it because the third party insurance is disputing liability. Do they have a right to do this, seeing as I have already taken back the car and sold it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have it in writing from the third party or their Insurers that they are liable 100% for the accident damage, then yes they can withdraw the offer. By the sounds of it, you were made on offer on the assumption that the third party driver was liable for the accident. For whatever reason they have changed their minds or their Insurers have.

 

I would suggest that you make sure whoever is dealing with the claim finds out the reasons for the dispute over liability, so you can challenge. If you have the legal cover on the policy, this may prove useful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...