Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They haven't got a litigation department - it's all Kev!  So if you don't pay, Kev will pass the matter to Kev.  OK. Not exactly a threat that will stop you sleeping at night.
    • Sorry, but I agree with Plymouth Council as stated in their letter.  Based on their description of their incident. If you disagree, exactly why do you believe the Council have been negligent ?   Does your wife have any disability that the sports centre staff were aware of and they were offering assistance to her during her visit to the centre ? If you feel you have a case, go to a local no win no fee personal injury Solicitors. 
    • Hi Sorry for uploading them wrong. Im not technical at all and self taught so bear with me as im trying my best. Thank you for all the info regarding the signs, this was my thoughts as well. Yes they have changed teh signs since this happened Ill ahve to have a look back through and see if when I took the pictures they were already the new ones or I have the old ones. I cant remember off hand. With regards to Europarks running the site now, Just to make you aware there is another small retail park just across the road and Im sure they are Europarks. The shops within that park are just Aldi and B & M. The site that we received the NTK has a few more shops, Home bargains, The food Warehouse, M & S food and a few others. I put these for identififcation purposes just in case it is the other site that you were looking at. The main entrance sign is on the bend on the left as you drive in the entrance so when you drive in from the right and turn in you can see it in front of you but if you drive in from the other way as we do then you dont see it unless you know its there and as you say you would have to stop to read it al anywayl. The main thing that always jumped out at us was FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in large letters. Please find the notice of hearing date attached and an offer letter I received from the vultures DCBLegal this morning,    notice of allocation group nexus.pdf vulture offer letter re group nexus.pdf
    • Good Afternoon Stu,  Many thanks for your reply. I will do as you suggest and email them for the exact terms. I shall have a look through the Tenancy Agreement too  myself  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Roberts v First direct


gardenut
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Well I've got the ball rolling. I sent a letter to First Direct enclosing a cheque for £10 and requesting bank statements for the last 6 years just last Tuesday. By Friday I had received a letter returning my cheque and was told that they don't charge for this service, but that they would send all 6 years statements by courier. Today, Tuesday, I received the lot. So far, very impressed.

 

OK. So now I'm looking for the charges I can reclaim. I assume these would be excessive overdraft fee. Can I claim back the overdraft fee? Any chance on the debit interest?

 

Can someone please clarify which I can claim.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will suggest that you aim for the actual amount of charges first. Compile all the actual charges applied to your account on the spreadsheet. Leave the interest until time for court. Claim only the actual amount of total charges, not interest.

 

When the bank refuse to refund your money now, the interest of 8% calculated on the spreadsheet will be added to it for the court claim. Before the court claim, do not ask them to refund interest. If they fail to refund the total charges, then you can progress the matter to the court. At that stage, you would be claiming statutory interest and court cost as well.

 

I hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

You CAN reclaim the debit interest charged on the charges, the spreadsheet is here,

 

http://www.cag-files.co.uk/barracad/Spreadsheets/England/Complex-bank-charges-calc.xls

 

Please note that you cannot just claim back all debit interest.

 

Please read the FAQs and start a post in the First Direct forum, we will be around to answer any queries you have

 

Best of luck :)

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, here goes. I have just completed the letter and list of charges I am sending to FD. I have taken a bit of time deciding which I can claim for as there were a lot of Debit Interest charges on my statements but they weren't because of overdraft charges, just my excess spending, and most of them were for just pence, so I decided not to include them. The whole lot amounts to about £1,117.

 

Fingers crossed, I will hear something positive within the next 14 days. I will keep you posted.

 

I have a fallback account set up, I have taken out a loan and paid off my overdraft and credit cards and the repayments are now just over half of what I was paying. If I get this amount it will completely pay off my credit card and will just leave the loan which I can handle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your posts moved into your bank group.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

Today I received a very polite letter from FD saying:

 

'I am sorry that you have had cause to complain. A response will be issued shortly, certainly within the next 10 days'

 

and enclosing a leaflet about listening to out comments.

 

Usual thing everyone gets I suppose.

 

Monday 19th Feb is the 14 day deadline so we'll see if anything materialises before then.

 

If it doesn't, do I prepare to go to court?

 

Marilyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

Today I received a very polite letter from FD saying 'I am sorry that you have had cause to complain. A response will be issued shortly, certainly within the next 10 days' and enclosing a leaflet about listening to out comments.

 

Usual thing everyone gets I suppose.

 

Monday 19th Feb is the 14 day deadline so we'll see if anything materialises before then.

 

If it doesn't, do I prepare to go to court?

 

I got exactly the same letter and the answer is simple: you IGNORE IT COMPLETELY. It has no bearing on your claim, it does not address the preliminary demand for repayment. The clock is ticking on that 14-day deadline and they know this, so no need to worry and remind them, either.

 

If you don't get what you want in full at the end of that 14-day period, go to your second demand, after which they get no more letters and you proceed with your claim.

 

They know the score. They are hoping that YOU do NOT.

 

All the best to you! I'm at the same stage and displaying a tenacity I never knew I had before... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, yesterday a series of forceful, 'I know what I'm doing' electronic messages led to them not refunding the latest batch of benefits they took from me but extending the overdraft by that amount until the 'matters' I raised in my letter have been 'resolved'. Kind of indicates to me they know they are going to have to cough up to folks now, as I expressly said no to a further overdraft level and, besides, they would never raise my overdraft in three years until now even when I almost near-begged. They knew they had to act quickly, and that the monies are all coming back to me.

 

Just remember how inflexible and hardline they've been to us all in the past and take a lesson from their book. Don't flinch, don't be diverted from this course of action. Always be civil but firm and I believe we will all benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Did you send the letter signed-for delivery? It's essential that you do, otherwise they can claim never having received it. If you did, you have proof not only of posting, but date received - you can check on the Royal Mail website by typing in the code from your receipt.

 

If you didn't send it signed-for, I would suggest you send the letter again, this time by signed-for delivery. If you did send it, and know they received it, then go ahead with the LBA. If you to LBA having no proof they received the first letter, they might argue you didn't follow due process.

 

I hope this is helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right madhouse, I have the receipt dated 5th February and today was the last day. I suppose if they only sent it today I could wait till tomorrow before I send the letter on Wednesday.

 

LBA it is then.

 

thanks for the support both of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was all ready to send the LBA and I got a letter in the post, dated 19th which was the last day, offering me £925 which is about 80% of my original claim, as a full and final settlement. Which is about par for the course.

 

They say they are not prepared to consider debit interest. Do I continue with my full claim?

 

By the way I have got this far by sending all letters to the FD address on my cheque book in Leeds, NOT to HSBC. They also state in their letter that if I want to 'escalate your concern' I am to continue doing so to the Leeds address. So that clears that up.

 

I'll look at others who are past this stage and see what they did, but any advice will be appreciated.

 

Thanks to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't had any advice from site re my last posting so have gone ahead and sent the LBA. I hope I have done the right thing.

 

What is worrying me is the fact that FD say they will not pay debit interest and that is the remainder of my claim.

 

Am I right to keep going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears blatantly obvious to me that banks are refusing to go to court, because they know the day they defend a case they have to justify their fees and can't. What it comes down too is and I'm sure they know this too, the amount they are paying out only £7910515 to 5659 declared claimants, extrapolate that a bit to others claiming through other sites and independents for ease sake double it make £15821030 add an arbitrary figure for claims in process lets say £10000000 thats £25821030 spread that over the 20 or so finance houses involved £1291051 Barclays being the only one I know of that have declared profits of 7Bn,others are probably similar figures, as you can see we claimants are not even 1%. Figures are made up but show that we are nothing more than a nasty itch. They won't start scratching beleive me! 8-)

Timeline

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I was wiating for First Direct to communicate with me I did a bit of searching on t'internet (too much time on my hands I know).

 

I found 13 Judges who'd remarked in the media about the way these claims were clogging up the process.

 

I then found the 'Judges Council' website (from what I can tell a sort of association of Judges).

 

So I've written to one of the chairmen(chairpersons) of a particuler working group (Mr Justice Etherton) on exactly this point.

 

i.e. can the judiciary do something to alleviate the pressure on the courts from tens of (hundred of?) thousands of actions againts the banks. In other words, bring a test case. Or if the procedure doesn't allow, disbar defences from Banks until disclosure into one of the courts.

 

Long shot I know, but it made me feel good writing the letter.

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULT!! cheerleader.gif

 

I received another offer from FD this morning and it's just £80 short of the figure I asked for, so I'm going to accept.

 

Thanks to all on this site who have supported me and I hope you are all as successful.thankyou.gif

 

Going to celebrate tonight!beerx2.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...