Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MarkyT vs Cahoot


MarkyT
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I recieved an email today from Cahoot to say that my complaint has been brought to the attention of their service relation managers.

 

Now, do I give them 14 days from when they sent the letter or 14 days from when I sent it.

I'm still a little confused about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just recieved the standard go away email from cahoot:

 

Dear xxxxxxx,

 

 

We don't accept that cahoot's charges are unfair or unlawful under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. The object of these Regulations was not price control nor were they intended to interfere with people's freedom to agree the terms of their contracts.

 

 

It's well known that banks make charges and cahoot's charges are in line with those of other banks. The terms and conditions of the account and the charges that apply are clear and fair and were provided to you at the time you opened it. You freely agreed to the terms and conditions and the charges when you opened the account. You weren't under any obligation to do so and could have gone to another bank if you didn't agree to the charges. Equally, you're free to move your account to another bank at any time if you don't agree with the charges.

 

In any event, we don't agree that the charges are disproportionate. The charges are reasonable and proportionate to the administrative costs incurred by cahoot.

 

I'm therefore unable to refund the charges you've incurred fully appreciating the disappointment this may cause.

 

 

 

Please be assured I have carried out a full investigation for you and I hope you feel I have offered a fair response to all of the issues you've raised. I will keep your file open for the next 8 weeks and if I don't hear from you within that time, I will assume that everything is resolved and will close your file. If you remain dissatisfied though you can find details of how to take your complaint further within Abbey at legal T&Ts under the heading 'Complaints policy'. The complaints policy also explains your ultimate right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

 

 

This bit at the bottom in bold has me stumped a bit now. Do I continue with the letter before action (which I have sitting printed next to me waiting to go now) or do I have to take this up with abbey?

Would the court see this in a bad light if I don't?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marky

 

After sending Cahoot my prelimary latter, they wrote back saying their final response was issued and that I should contact Abbeys stage 2 complaints team now.

 

I sent my LBA to them and got no reply, so filed the MCOL yesterday.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it with 45 pages of statements you are claiming charges from a current account?

 

I'm claiming from a credit card, but I expect our claims to run concurrently.

 

What area are you in? I'm in Bedfordshire.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, its a current account opened 6 years ago this very month. I'm in Tyne & Wear.

What I do find rather amusing from the statements is how the cost of the charges seems to steadily rise from £20 for a returned DD to 35 at the moment. And now I noticed that in the last 2 months since I first sent them the SAR letter, they are now allowing DDs to go through if I'm over my overdraft. Normally, if I went a penny over, they would bounce it and hit me with a charge. This happened xmas 2005 when they charged me £175 right at the beggining of december and left me with the most miserable christmas ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same with LloydsTSB. What I do now is cancel the direct debit before it goes out, then set it back up when I can afford it. Internet banking makes it so easy now to do.

 

They settled my claim just before an allocation hearing in November. If I get a letter now telling me of charges, I write to them stating I will start another litigation and their earliest attention to this matter will save them my costs etc. To date, their response has been "we will waive the charge". No doubt their attitude will soon change.

 

When I started my Halifax credit card claim, they settled the full amount after the LBA letter. I didn't have to start MCOL and there were no conditions imposed either.

 

Not expecting an easy ride with Cahoot though. Am well aware this will hang around for a long while yet, and that it will drag out until the last possible moment.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to say, just make sure that when you submit your MCOL all the charges are still within the six year period.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first charge they applied was in March 2001 so it looks as if it'll be ok.

I've been looking under the court bundle this morning and don't understand this one bit. How much of this stuff am I exected to learn and understand and how does it get used?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well well well, received a letter from Abbey yesterday. I thought a little odd as I bank with Cahoot.

 

"Dear Mr MarkyT

 

thank you for contacting us and I am sorry that you have been so unhappy that you have felt you must complain.

 

One of my team will be responsible for investigating you complaint and I have enclosed out Complaints leaflet, which explains our procedure for doing this. High quality customer service is of great importance to us at Abbey and we will do everything we can to resolve your complaint in a timeley and satifactory manner.

 

I know it is important to you that we resolve you complaint quickly, but we want to complete a thorough investigation and sometimes this can take time. If we have not contacted you before then, we will write to you in four weeks to let you know what is happening.

 

If you have employed someone to handle you complaint on your behalf, please note:

employing a third party complaint-handling firm, or a solicitor, or financial advisor does not affect how we review your complaint. Please be aware that:

Abbey does not charge you to investigate your complaint

Abbey will not be liable for any costs incurred if you do decide to employ a third party to handle your complaint during this review

Abbey, in general, will only make payment directly to account holder(s) if your complaint is upheld and redress is due.

 

Although I do not know what the outcome will be, I do hope that we will be able to find a solution that you are happy with.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Andrew Nelson

Business Manager"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter from Abbey on the 31st January saying my complaint is taking longer than first thought to investigate.

 

Then, on the 1st February (the next day) I had a letter saying after investigating the complaint in full they cannot refund my charges.

 

Are you set to start the claim Monday / Tuesday?

 

The right hand not knowing what the left hands doing springs to mind.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really ready to make the claim on Monday due to things happening at home over the last couple of weeks.:-x

 

Haven't had a chance to prepare anything yet. Probably will be what I spend all weekend on now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK folks need help on this. I'm finally able to enter the MCOL today and am confused with something.

The total of my charges is £2085. I have indicated on MCOL that I wish to claim interest totally £429.24. Do I add this to my claim ie the box in which you add the numbers or do I just enter the £2085 while detailing the interest in the text box in which I detail my claim?

Please help cos I need to get this in asap.

 

EDIT: Meant to ask as well, I've entered the defendants name as Cahoot and on the second line c/o Abbey National plc. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my claim form I wrote the defendants name and address as:

 

Cahoot

Friars House

P.O. Box 1981

Coventry

CV1 2ZD

 

Amount claimed is the amount plus interest. Then the court fee is added (depending on amount of your claim) . This makes the total amount.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hunt down a mod and they will add it to the "litigation in progress" sub-catagory.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defendant acknowledge my claim on the 2nd March 2007. Only took them 3 days to acknowledge. That seems worryingly fast. Anyone have any idea if this is a good or a bad thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats OK Mark.

 

Now they have a further time scale to enter their defence.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved a letter from Abbey this morning.

 

"Dear MarkyT"

 

YOURSELF -V- CAHOOT

CLAIM NO. 7 QZ 23915

 

We are in the process of reviewing this claim and preparing our response. A defence will be filed in due course.

 

In the meantime, we note that you have claimed the sum of £2514.24 in respect of charges that you say have been made on your Choot account. However, you have not provided details as to how this sum has been calculated. Similarly, you have not provided details of the interest showing how that amount is made up with reference to each charge.

 

As you will appreciate, you will need to produce evidence to the Court regarding these amounts, and this information should have been supplied by you when you filed your claim. We should be grateful if you would provide such details to us as soon as possible.

It would also be helpful at this stage if you can provide e-mail and telephone contact details to us.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Abbey National plc."

 

 

Now, I sent 3 letters on 26th Febuary. One to the court - recorded delivery, one to cahoot - recorded delivery and one to Abbey - standard delivery. Each of these letters included my schedule of charges. The recorded items were signed for on the 28th.

 

Should I send another schedule to abbey (recorded this time of course)?

 

I also noticed that the letter has been hand signed but there is no name on it. The signature looks like a squiggle so I have no idea who sent it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,

this seems to be a standard letter. I had exactly the same. I did send another copy of the schedule to them, of course all recorded, with the following covering letter:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding the above claim.

I appreciate very well that i need to produce evidence to the court regarding these amounts and have done so at all stages, prelim,LBA, at date of filing my claim and email to cahoot customer relations department, and for Abbey National to claim otherwise is simply untrue. However, as a courtesy i am enclosing yet another copy and look forward to an early settlement in full.

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...