Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Buchanan Clark & Wells and Aktiv Kaptial – REALLY UNSURE…


kalvinh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I’m new to this forum and would really appreciate some advice. From reading the many threads I can see that BCW is very popular here! Firtstly let me apologise, it’s a bit of a long post.

 

I received a ‘Final Notice’ from BCW stating that I needed to pay an outstanding debt with their client Aktiv Kapital of approx £2,500, and that they had apparently written previously. It went on to say that unless I pay immediately they would commence legal proceedings against me. However:

 

(a) I have never received any correspondence from BCW,

 

(b) I have never heard of Aktiv Kapital Investments Ltd prior to this letter, though from reading posts on the forum it appears they purchase other debts,

 

© I have no knowledge whatsoever of the supposed £2,500 debt, and

 

(d) The letter was addressed in my maiden name.

The only thing I can think of which it could possibly be relating to is from when I was working for a subsidiary of Barclays Bank before I got married more than 5 years ago. Whilst I was there they funded my course (approx £1,300), which I passed. I had a verbal agreement with the Director of the company that as long as I passed I would not have to pay back the course fees, however no agreement was ever signed. When I left Barclays in June 2001 they gave me a generic letter stating that I had to pay back any loans however this only mentioned barclayloans & season tickets specifically, and as I had passed my exams I did not think anything of it. Soon afterwards I moved in with my partner. Letters were received at my previous address asking for repayment of the course fees to which I responded in August 2001 by firstly speaking with Barclay’s HR department, and followed with an email to the Director upon their suggestion. I heard nothing until December 2001 (again at my former address) when I was again being chased for repayment to which I replied with an email to the Director asking him to sort this out once and for all and reminding him of the agreement. I also told him that any further correspondence should be to my email address only. I never heard anything again and assumed that he had indeed sorted out the misunderstanding.

 

But, this is the only thing I can think of that BCW could possibly be chasing. Assuming it is this Barclays issue I have no idea where I now stand. Would this be covered by CCA or would it fall into the realms of Employment Law? Given that there was never a signed agreement, or anything contained in the Employment Contract, and the fact that there was a verbal agreement can I now 5+ years on be forced to pay this back?

 

From reading other posts I think I should send BCW a letter stating the following:

 

(a) I have never had any previous correspondence from BCW or Aktiv Capital,

 

(b) I have no knowledge whatsoever of Aktiv Kapital or of any debt,

 

© I therefore dispute the alleged debt,

 

(d) I request that they provide a copy of the agreement under CCA, and

 

(e) They are in breach of the Data Protection Act by holding my details (albeit old ones) without having registered with the Information Commissioners Office.

Is this about right or have I totally missed the point? Any help would be really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Basically, send the CCA letter which you will find in the template letters on this site.

 

Whether this fringes on employment law or not, it is still a debt which is being chased by the third party.

 

Send the CCA letter and dont forget to include a £1 postal order. Sit back and wait for their reply.

 

The documents you receive back should give you more information on what the debt was actually for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread.

A search on BCWs website shows them as very active themselves mid-way to end of debt recovery cycles.

Ak have obviously farmed out the collection since it is in its final year.

Its therefore important that you do nothing to allow them to kickstart the 6 year limitation.

In your communications make it clear that you accept no liability and are merely in contact with them to establish why they are wanting you too pay it.

You will know soon enough as to whether they are able to supply the paperwork as if they cannot they will send your cheque back and pass the file back to AK.

AK are themselves not always quick to write letters when its YOU requesting something from THEM.

I sent a cca to them in July and have the signed Royal mail proof of delivery for it.They continued to send the threatening letters and ignored my cca request completely.I am still dealing with this through trading standards.

  • Confused 1

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, got a reply from BCW today. Basically they're saying they don't hold credit agreements and that I should submit my request directly to Aktiv Kapital. They also returned the £1 cheque. The worrying thing is that they have not said whether or not they intend to take this further as per thir previous Final Notice letter.

 

Within the CCA letter I sent them I stated that any further correspondence from them should be only by registered or recorded post, not normal post which is unreliable and could not be guarenteed. They of course sent it by normal post. I also stated that they should remove my details from their records as they were acting illegally in not being registered with the Information Commissioners Office.

 

Does this all mean that I can ignore their letter altogether? And are they likely to pursue things further or pass the alleged debt back to Aktiv Kapital? :confused:

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something fishy going on with BCW. Am looking into it and will post back here.

 

In the meantime, just wait for AK to get back to you...............which may take some time!!!

Spotnot v MBNA and their nasty solicitors (on behalf of my friend)

 

If I have helped in any way, click my scales.

 

Remember, we were all newbies once!!

 

When you win, donate!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does this all mean that I can ignore their letter altogether? And are they likely to pursue things further or pass the alleged debt back to Aktiv Kapital? :confused:

 

Many thanks!

 

BCW cannot and will not harm you. By their own admission they have no documentation that they could take into court ro substantiate a claim against you. The letter (and others you may get from them) are designed to frighten you into starting repayments. They may pester you, but that's all.

 

Send the CCA request to AK. They most probably won't have the right documents either!

 

Also send a SAR for all the info they have on you. That will establish exactly what they are chasing you for.

 

Don't forget to send £1 for the CCA and £10 for the SAR.:)

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks spotnot & elsinore!

 

Reassuring to have firm advice back.

 

Do you think it would be better to wait and hear from AK first, before sending the CCA and SAR to them?

 

I have no idea of what the process is from AK's side. Does the Final Notice received from BCW mean that AK can now take legal proceedings without further notice to me? Or are they still obliged to send a demand for payment irrespective of what BCW has sent?

 

Thanks, K

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do you think it would be better to wait and hear from AK first, before sending the CCA and S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to them?

 

It's really up to you Kalvin. If you do nothing, you may never hear from AK again. Or you can force the issue and try to find out what it is they have on you.

 

If you haven't already done it, get your credit reports from the Credit Reference Agencies. You might find some clues on there.

 

I wouldn't worry too much about AK, they usually don't have the proper authority to sue anybody. They might threaten you, but as I mentioned before, it's all designed to panic you into giving them money.

 

I have a series of eight letters from AK which they have recently sent me at fortnightly intervals. They are computer generated letters (all different!) which the AK computer burps out no matter what.

 

When you're satisfied that they are in the wrong, you can take great pleasure in reporting them to all and sundry! :)

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...